View clinical trials related to Aortic Valve Stenosis.
Filter by:Obtain safety and effectiveness data to support indication expansion for the Medtronic TAVR System to include patients with moderate, AS.
The study aims to evaluate the processes of a pilot single-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) of carbon-dioxide flushing of transcatheter aortic valves (TAVI-CO2) versus standard saline flushing of valves (TAVI-S) and assess potential neuroprotection through a number of neurological endpoints for planning of a full-sized RCT
This is an adaptive Phase 2/3 multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel, 3 arm study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DA-1229 compared to placebo in patients with calcific aortic valve disease with mild to moderate aortic stenosis. There are 3 arms in this study to which patients will be randomized in a ratio of 1:1:1 to receive the DA-1229 or placebo orally once daily for a period of 104 weeks . the 3 arms are: placebo, DA-1229 5mg GroupDA-1229 10 mg Group. The study will have three phases: Screening Period (up to 4 weeks), Treatment Period (104 weeks), and Follow-Up Period (2-4 weeks). Total Study Duration is112 Weeks.
The purpose of the current study is to assess complete coronary physiology (FFR, RFR, CFR, IMR, and CT-FFR) in TAVI candidates with intermediate coronary artery stenosis before and 6 months after TAVI. This aims to determine how TAVI affects coronary blood flow and coronary microcirculatory function after longer-term follow-up, and how these effects influence FFR and RFR values. In addition, it is aimed to correlate invasive functional testing (FFR and RFR) with non-invasive CT-FFR before and 6 months after TAVI.
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the preferred therapy for aortic stenosis. Given the growing life-expectancy, the risk of requiring coronary interventions or of developing prosthesis degeneration that could require TAVR-in-TAVR for its treatment progressively increases. During standard TAVI procedures the native and the prosthesis commissures are randomly aligned with misalignment in up to 70% of the cases. This might hinder coronary re-access in 18% of the cases, increase the risk of coronary obstruction during future TAVR-in-TAVR procedures, and has been associated to greater residual gradients. Methods: Although several techniques have been developed to increase the degree of commissural alignment, all are imperfect or imply manipulation of the system within the patient, potentially increasing the risk of complications. The research team developed a software based on computed tomography analysis that allows planification of accurate commissural alignment by inserting the delivery system in a patient-specific degree of rotation. Aim: The proponent team aimed to prospectively validate this methodology comparing a cohort of patients harboring TAVR with Acurate Commissural Alignment (ACA) vs. a control cohort with non-ACA standard technique, in order to determine benefits in terms of coronary re-access and clinical events (coronary events, valve degeneration, and TAVR-in-TAVR).
The aim of this trial is to evaluate the safety and cost effectiveness of omission of percutaneous coronary intervention of significant coronary artery disease in patients scheduled to undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
The ART-VR Trial is an international multi-center, open label, randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of an immersive VR environment on procedural anxiety in patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve replacement (TAVR) under local anaesthesia.
Open-label, 2 x 2 factorial, prospective, randomized, national, multicenter study to compare latest-generation self-expanding valves and a minimalist approach versus standard of care in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
ACASA-TAVI is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial assessing the value of anticoagulation therapy versus the standard antiplatelet therapy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with aortic stenosis. The trial will assess the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) therapy compared to the standard single antiplatelet therapy to prevent degeneration of the valve and its safety in co-primary endpoints with blinded endpoint adjudication. The effect of DOAC therapy on hard clinical outcomes will be assessed during long-term follow-up.
1. Introduction and aims: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the gold standard for the treatment of elderly patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). AS causes left ventricular remodeling as well as left atrial enlargement, pulmonary artery and right ventricular changes, these changes, and whether they are reversible (reverse remodeling) are major determinants of outcome after TAVR. Heart Failure (HF) is the most frequent cause of cardiac re-hospitalization after TAVR. Most HF exacerbations are related to a progressive rise in cardiac filling pressures that precipitates pulmonary congestion and symptomatic decompensation. Traditionally, pulmonary congestion has been assessed by physical examination and chest radiography but clinical signs and symptoms of congestion are poor surrogates for ventricular filling pressures and are not reliable predictors of imminent hospitalization. Recently, lung ultrasonography (LUS) has been identified as a sensitive and semi-quantitative tool for the assessment of pulmonary congestion in HF. The technique is based on the detection of vertical echogenic artifacts arising from the pleural line, named "B-lines". The number of B-lines is associated with increased risk of adverse events during hospitalization and after hospital discharge. CLUSTER-HF Trial demonstrated that the routine incorporation of LUS during clinical follow-up of patients with recent acute decompensated HF without a surgically correctable cause, was associated with a risk reduction of adverse HF events, mainly urgent HF visits. Thus, LUS could represent a promising tool to detect pulmonary congestion related to AS. To date, there are no studies on the role of LUS in the context of AS and TAVR. The study hypothesis is that in patients with higher number of B-lines before-TAVR and after TAVR, the rate of adverse events during follow-up is higher. 2. Study design: This is a single center prospective study carried out at Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Roma and involving patients with severe aortic stenosis submitted to TAVR treatment. The expected recruitment period is approximately one year For patients fulfilling inclusion/exclusion criteria, all data about clinical status leading to TAVR, exams and any specific documentation during hospitalization will be collected. 3. Number of patients: For the primary end-point, a sample-size of 91 is computed using the one-sample chi-square test and assuming a proportion of LUS-evaluated pulmonary congested patients before TAVR of 50% and a proportion of 35% of LUS-evaluated pulmonary congested patients after TAVR. To accommodate for possible missing investigations, sample size will be increased to 105 patients. The secondary end-point is the association between pre-TAVR and post-TAVR B-lines and long-term outcomes. Based on previous studies, the investigators know that the incidence of rehospitalization for heart failure during one-year after TAVR is 14% and that patients suffering from heart failure without LUS-evaluated pulmonary congestion are at very low risk of heart failure rehospitalization during follow-up. So, for sample size calculation of the secondary endpoint, the investigators estimated a cumulative incidence higher in the LUS- evaluated pulmonary congestion group with more than 16 B-lines on all scanning sites (30% of events during 1-year of follow-up) with a lower incidence of 8% in the remaining patients. With an HR of 5 favoring patients wit less than 15 B-Lines on all scanning, and aiming to a 2-sided alpha level of 0.05 and a power of 80% the investigators estimated 144 patients. To accommodate for possible missing investigations, sample size will be increased to 150 patients. 4. In-hospital study schedule: For each patient, the investigators will obtain from our general hospital database the following clinical data: - Demographic and clinical data documentation; - Clinical examination: before TAVR, before discharge and when adverse events occur; - Blood analysis; - TAVR procedural characteristics and complications. 5. Instrumental diagnostic exams (Echocardiography and lung ultrasound): Each patient will be evaluated before and after TAVR with a comprehensive echocardiogram and LUS for the evaluation of the pulmonary congestion. All the evaluations will be performed the day before TAVR and after TAVR. In consideration of the operator's dependence on ultrasound methods to reduce the error rate, all examinations will be performed by qualified personnel. 6. Clinical follow up assessment: Clinical follow up information will be obtained from: visits, review of the patient's hospital record, personal communication with the patient's physician and review of the patient's chart, a telephone interview with the patient conducted by trained medical personnel The following information will be recorded: clinical status assessment, adverse event assessment, record cardiac medications.