View clinical trials related to Aortic Valve Stenosis.
Filter by:Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease among elderly population, with a increasing prevalence due to population ageing. In developed countries, the prevalence of severe AS among ≥75 years is approximately 3.4%. The onset of symptoms is associated with a poor prognosis. Indeed, mortality increases once symptoms appears. For several decades, surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has been the standard of care for symptomatic AS. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was introduced as alternative treatment in inoperable patients in 2002. In the last two decades TAVI has led to a paradigm shift in the treatment of severe AS, representing a less invasive alternative to surgery. TAVI has shown to be non-inferior or superior to SAVR in several large-scale randomized clinical trials (RCTs) across the full spectrum of surgical risks. The newly available evidence has led to an expansion of guideline recommendations for TAVI. Furthermore, newer generations of transcatheter heart valve (THV) design, better patient selection, and technical enhancements have driven improvement in safety and reduction of procedural complications over time. This observational study aim to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of the procedure and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in cognitive performance in the early postoperative (1 month) and late (1 year) postoperative period in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (SVAo) with surgery (SVA_Q) or transcatheter aortic valve implant (TAVI), by neuropsychological study (NRP), structural Brain Magnetic Resonance (sMRI) and functional MRI (fMRI). The specific objectives are: (1) to compare the early and late clinical-functional consequences with NRP study in both groups; (2) to compare the occurrence of cerebral clinical events during follow-up; (3) to quantify and compare the appearance of silent lesions in the early postoperative period and late of SVAo with sMRI with respect to the baseline MRI in both groups; (4) study with fMRI changes in the activity and functional connectivity and correlate them with the NRP findings in all patients in the early and late phase in comparison with the basal MRI. METHODOLOGY: Prospective longitudinal, unicentric, nonrandomized cohort study of consecutive patients> 70 years, with indication for SVAo and intermediate and high surgical risk. One month before surgery will be performed an sMRI and fMRI and a baseline NRP study. One month after surgery, sMRI, fMRI and NRP study will be performed to assess the appearance of new lesions, as well as changes in cognitive performance with respect to baseline cognitive status. One year later, sMRI, fMRI and NRP study will be performed to assess changes in cognitive status with respect to baseline and early postoperative. Response variables: changes in cognitive performance measured by a Global Cognitive Impairment Index and in cognitive status (normal vs. Mild Cognitive Impairment vs Moderate Impairment), number, size and location of new silent brain lesions, cerebral vascular clinical events, and changes in advanced neuroimaging (image by diffusion tensor (DTI), resting-state fMRI) and its relationship with cognitive changes.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of antifibrotic therapy on regression of myocardial fibrosis after TAVI in patients with baseline high fibrotic burden. Therefore, patients will be treated with Spironolactone in addition to standard of care, Spioronolactone + Dihydralazine in addition to standard of care or according to standard of care alone without any study medication. First, differences between patients in the control arm and patients randomized to anti-fibrotic therapy will be analyzed. The second analysis will determine, whether dihydralazine medication in addition to spironolactone is able to increase a potential antifibrotic effect. Myocardial fibrosis will be assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) before TAVI and 1 year after. Quantification of potentially irreversible replacement fibrosis will be carried out by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and quantification of the potentially reversible diffuse interstitial fibrosis will be performed by measurement of the extracellular volume fraction (ECV), thereby deriving matrix volume and cell volume.
The DETECT AS Trial is a randomized clinical trial and quality improvement initiative that seeks to investigate the impact of electronic provider notification of severe aortic stenosis (AS) on its management, on the utilization of aortic valve replacement (AVR), and on ethnic and racial disparities in AVR utilization. After the investigators identify patients in whom echocardiography shows severe aortic stenosis, defined by an aortic valve area (AVA) <1.0cm2, the ordering provider of the echocardiogram will then be randomly assigned to either the intervention group or to the control group. Providers randomly assigned to the intervention group will be sent an electronic (email or message via the electronic health record) physician notification for every one of their patients with severe aortic stenosis on TTE. Electronic notification will also highlight relevant ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guideline recommendations regarding the management of severe AS. No intervention will be performed for patients belonging to physicians assigned to the control group. The primary endpoint will be AVR utilization, defined as the proportion of patients with a clinical indication for severe AS that undergo AVR. Clinical indications will be based upon the 2020 AHA/ACC Clinical Practice Guidelines for Valvular Heart Disease. Secondary end-points will be mortality, heart failure hospitalization, TTE utilization/surveillance, AS billing code diagnosis, and cardiology/Heart Valve Team referral. Pre-defined subgroup analyses will be performed to assess AVR utilization among women, racial/ethnic minority groups, low-gradient AS, cardiologist and non-cardiologist ordering provider, and inpatient and outpatient practice settings.
In this study, the investigators evaluate whether routine double inflation of the valve could have a lasting impact. The investigators hypothesize that a routine second reinflation of the balloon, or "double tap", will improve flow across the valve when compared to a single inflation. The investigators hypothesize that "double tap" (1) will decrease mean gradient between first and second inflation during the procedure, (2) will decrease mean gradient on immediate post procedure and 30 day postprocedure echocardiograms when compared to mean gradient gradient after single inflation. Less obstruction indicated by lower mean gradient early after deployment may translate to improved 5 and 10 year outcomes. Furthermore, the investigators hypothesize that this small change in technique will have no effect on procedure time or complications and the change will not result in any increase in perioperative vascular complications, or new permanent pacemaker insertion. The primary objective of this study is to determine if double valve inflation during a TAVR procedure improves valve area and mean gradients as measured by echocardiogram immediately following the procedure and at 30 days follow up.
Aortic stenosis is narrowing of the aortic valve, and is the commonest type of valve disease requiring surgery. Current guidelines recommend waiting till patients develop symptoms (chest pain, breathlessness and dizzy spells/fainting) before possible open heart surgery to replace the valve is offered. However, studies using detailed 'MRI' scanning of the heart have shown that up to half of the patients already have 'scarring' in the heart by the time symptoms develop. Furthermore, scarring is not fully reversed even after surgery and is associated with worse outcome. This suggests that some patients are being offered treatment too late. Two randomised trials in the UK (EASY AS and EVOLVED) are currently investigating if valve replacement before symptoms will result in better survival. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of early valve replacement versus waiting for symptoms, on the amount of scarring in the heart. The investigators want to know if early treatment leads to less overall scarring at the end, and leads to better quality of life and recovery after surgery. The investigators will invite participants of the EASY AS and EVOLVED trials to have 1-2 MRI heart scans: at recruitment and 3 years after being randomly allocated to early aortic valve replacement vs 'watchful waiting'. The investigators will also assess the impact of the two treatment approaches on quality of life, disability-free survival (using questionnaires) and recovery after surgery. The results from this project will increase understanding of the results of the main trials, and lead to improved selection of patients with aortic stenosis who are likely to benefit from early surgery.
The objective of this study is to establish the safety and effectiveness of the Edwards SAPIEN X4 Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV) in subjects who are at high or greater risk with a failing aortic bioprosthetic valve.
The objective of this study is to establish the safety and effectiveness of the Edwards SAPIEN X4 Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV) in subjects with symptomatic, severe, calcific aortic stenosis (AS).
The objective of this study is to evaluate the long term safety and effectiveness of the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve system in real world setting.
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in the developed world. Once symptomatic, untreated patients have a poor prognosis with five-year survival rate of 25%. Once at an advanced stage, AS will lead to the development of left ventricle hypertrophy, and eventually heart failure and death. At-present, there is no effective medical therapy for aortic stenosis. Current management of patients with AS consists of 'watchful waiting'. Valve replacement is needed when these patients (often acutely) become symptomatic. Recent studies have shown that inflammatory processes with similarities to atherosclerosis play an important role in AS. Therefore, we hypothesize that treatment with anti-inflammatory therapy, in the form of colchicine, could reduce the progression of AS. If positive, this trial will be the first to provide a potential therapeutic option for millions of people world-wide with AS.