View clinical trials related to Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Filter by:AMI Survivors who participated in the project "Construction and key technology research of the whole myocardial protection system for acute myocardial infarction" (project number 2016YFC1301100) and completed the 1-year visit were followed up by telephone at 3 years (within the corresponding follow-up time window) and 5 years after discharge to acquire the patients' medication, health status, and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, including death, heart failure, rehospitalization, re-myocardial infarction, revascularization, stroke, malignant arrhythmia, and bleeding events.
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of an innovative program of secondary cardiovascular prevention focused on patient empowerment. This program will be characterized by a blended interaction between healthcare workers and the patients: first, a face-to-face first encounter in-hospital for risk factors profiling, followed by remote interactions through a digital approach. The digital intervention is targeted at promoting the adoption and retention of virtuous behavior (e.g. smoking cessation, healthy eating habits, physical exercise, regular assumption of pharmacological therapies), improving cardiovascular risk factors control. Moreover, an exploratory endpoint will be investigated: the reduction of the residual coronary risk.
The primary objective of this study is to compare patients eligible for ASS and Ticagrelor against those eligible for ASS and Prasugrel. The available information regarding relative and absolute exclusion criteria outlines reasons for disqualification from either drug. The secondary objectives of the study are to: - Assess the proportion of patients who received ASS and Ticagrelor in the study cohort. - Compare the proportion of patients who received ASS and Ticagrelor against the proportion of patients who qualify for DAPT with ASS and Ticagrelor (eligible group). - Describe the antithrombotic treatment, including antiplatelet monotherapies, and antiplatelet therapies with or without anticoagulation. The investigators will use these objectives to evaluate the effectiveness and appropriateness of the different antiplatelet therapies in the study population. Participants will not be personally identified in any reports or publications resulting from this study.
This study aims to explore the heart failure risk model based on the dynamic data of patients with different outcome nodes after myocardial infarction to correct the heart failure risk of patients timely.
Cardiac troponin is central to the diagnosis of myocardial infarction and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays are the preferred choice for the assessment of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Since the introduction of hs-cTn assays in Europe in 2010, most hospitals have switched from contemporary sensitive cardiac troponin assays to a hs-cTn assay. The implementation of hs-cTn assays has led to an increase in the number of patients identified with myocardial injury. Although both hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT assays are recommended in current guidelines, the impact of switching from a hs-cTnI assay to a hs-cTnT assay on clinical practice is unknown. At this point, no studies have evaluated the impact of implementing sex-specific hs-cTnT thresholds on the diagnosis of myocardial infarction and outcome in clinical practice. The investigators propose to determine the proportion of patients with and without myocardial injury admitted to the hospital before and after implementation of a hs-cTnT assay and to evaluate the impact on investigations, care and clinical outcomes in consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.
COMPLETE-2 is a prospective, multi-centre, randomized controlled trial comparing a strategy of physiology-guided complete revascularization to angiography-guided complete revascularization in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) who have undergone successful culprit lesion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). COMPLETE-2 OCT is a large scale, prospective, multi-centre, observational, imaging study of patients with STEMI or NSTEMI and multivessel CAD in a subset of eligible COMPLETE-2 patients.
The benefits of cardiac rehabilitation include improving exercise tolerance and quality of life. However the attending rate of the patients with acute myocardial infarction was low according to the previous studies. This is a retrospective chart review study collecting the basic characteristics of the patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction of Wang-Fang Hospital (from Jan 1, 2012 to June 30, 2021). The aims of the studies are to investigate the related issues of cardiac rehabilitation including (1) attending rate (2) the efficacy of exercise training (3) the factors that limit the participation of the training programs.
- Dual antiplatelet agent therapy (DAPT) is essential in treating PCI patients. DAPT can minimize thrombotic adverse events that occur not only at the stented lesion, but along the whole coronary tree. However, DAPT has a critical side effect of increasing bleeding complications. Addressing the clinical imperatives of lowering bleeding while preserving ischemic benefit requires therapeutic strategies that decouple thrombotic from hemorrhagic risk. - Recently, the ARC definition of high bleeding risk (HBR) has been published, so as to stress the need of optimal DAPT treatment in HBR patients. Due to the definitely higher bleeding risk in HBR patients, it would be rather more straight forward to titrate the optimal DAPT duration in these patients. In this line, many studies are in progress on HBR patients, with an ultra-short DAPT duration (i.e. Leaders free, Onyx ONE, Master DAPT, Xience 28, Xience 90, Evolve short DAPT trial, etc.). - As a counteract to the definition of HBR, there is a concept of LBR. Due to the relatively vague ischemic/bleeding risk in LBR patients, balancing ischemic and bleeding complications post-PCI is more difficult in LBR patients, which may be a more important dilemma for clinicians. In this regards, limited evidence exists on the optimal duration of DAPT in LBR patients. Various previous studies that have evaluated the optimal DAPT in PCI populations, did not have the concept of HBR or LBR, making interpretation difficult. - Therefore, this study is planning to compare the efficacy and safety of different DAPT durations, in patients stratified according to the ARB-HBR definition.
Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Every year, millions of people suffer its most adverse manifestation, an acute myocardial infraction (AMI). The majority of these patients present at least one of the standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs). These include smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus (DM). However, emerging scientific evidence recognizes a clinically significant proportion of patients presenting with life-threatening AMI without any SMuRF (SMuRF-less patients). This proportion of patients with ACS without SMuRF appears to be increasing during the last two decades and has recently been reported as high as 20% (of total AMIs). To date, there are no scientific data capable of highlighting specific risk factors-biomarkers responsible for the development of AMIs SMuRF-less patients. Therefore, two groups of patients with AMI (with SMuRFs vs SMuRF-less) will be compared regarding their clinical, laboratory and imaging (echocardiographic and angiographic) profile, and possible predictive factors leading to SMuRF-less AMI will be evaluated. On the basis of the above, the aim is to prospectively analyze a cohort of well-characterized patients with AMI. The rationale of the study is to investigate potential correlations between metabolic profile of patients and SMuRF-less AMI. This could lead to the development of predictive risk stratification algorithms for patients without SMuRFs and coronary artery disease.
This study is a prospective, open-label, two-arm, randomized multicenter trial to identify whether immediate multi-vessel PCI would be better in clinical outcomes compared with culprit lesion-only PCI for AMI and multi-vessel disease with an advanced form of CS patients who require veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA-ECMO).