Clinical Trials Logo

Wound Infection clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Wound Infection.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT02919410 Completed - Clinical trials for Surgical Wound Infection

Bacterial Colonization With and Without Iodophor-impregnated Adhesive Drapes in Hip Surgery: a Prospective, Randomized Trial

Start date: October 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a prospective, randomized control trial evaluating the efficacy of iodophor-impregnated adhesive drapes for reducing bacterial count in hip surgery.

NCT ID: NCT02915289 Completed - Wound Infection Clinical Trials

Chlorhexidine Gluconate vs Povidone-Iodine Vaginal Cleansing Solution Prior to Cesarean Delivery

Start date: December 2016
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Endometritis, an infection of the uterus in the postpartum period, has been shown to complicate the postoperative course of a cesarean delivery in 6% to 27% of cases. Vaginal cleansing prior to cesarean delivery has been shown to minimize the presence of micro-organisms and risk of infection. Although povidone-iodine is the most commonly used anti-septic for surgical preparation of the vagina, it is not an ideal agent due to it's diminished efficacy in acidic vaginal pH and in the presence of blood. Chlorhexidine gluconate, on the other hand, has demonstrated superior disinfectant properties in several clinical trials, as compared to povidone iodine. In this randomized, comparator controlled, study the investigators will be comparing chlorhexidine gluconate vs povidone iodine for intrapartum vaginal preparation in women undergoing non-emergent cesarean delivery.

NCT ID: NCT02891486 Completed - Infection Clinical Trials

Analysis of the Incidence of Post-Operative Wound Infections After Spine Surgery

Start date: June 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Post-operative wound infections can prolong hospital stays, increase rates of readmission to the intensive care unit, and increase the costs of treatment significantly. This study will conduct a prospective chart review of all patients undergoing elective spinal surgery on both the neurosurgery and orthopedic spine services at two facilities on an academic campus. The investigators will collect the data of those patients who develop post-surgical infections. This data will then be analyzed and compared to published data from other studies. The aim of this investigation is to passively collect this infection data, which may ultimately provide needed baseline incidence rates using current and standard protocols.

NCT ID: NCT02863874 Completed - Wound Infection Clinical Trials

The PLUS Study: Comparison of VicrylPlus® Versus Vicryl® for Repair of Perineal Tears

Start date: January 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

INTRODUCTION It is estimated that over 80% of women who give vaginal birth will sustain some form of perineal tear and of these 60-70% will require suturing. It is of great importance that operators are familiar with the best suturing technique and suture material in order to minimize possible associated short- and long-term sequelae. There is evidence for suturing continuously to reduce postoperative pain and superficial dyspareunia, but the choice of suture-material is still debated. The function of a suture is to close the wound to minimize the bleeding, the risk for infection and to adapt the wound edges to promote anatomic correct healing. Infection results in softened wound edges, shirked sutures, pain and dehiscence. Delayed and/or compromised wound healing is correlated with impaired strength in the affected tissue. Reported frequency of infection after first and second degree tear is between 1 and 11% where the discrepancy most likely is due to poor registration and follow-up. In 2004 Polyglactin 910 was launched with a new antibacterial coating of Triclosan (VicrylPlus®). Studies suggest a correlation between the use of VicrylPlus® and a reduction of up to 30% of surgical site infections (SSI) compared to conventional sutures in a non-colonized wound. OBJEKTIVE: The primary objective is to compare infection rates and pain intensity when using Vicryl® versus VicrylPlus® for perineal repair after delivery. Secondly, to show if there is a difference in sequelae (pelvic floor dysfunction) after one year between the two groups. METHODS The participants are randomly allocated to continuously suturing with either Vicryl® or VicrylPlus®. Sealed identical-looking envelopes are prepared and placed in the delivery room (randomized into blocks of 50) containing randomization number, sutures, declaration of informed consent and questionnaires. The participants are instructed to fill in the first questionnaire after 7 days and the second questionnaire after 8 weeks post partum. After 8 weeks all participants are offered a routine visit to the "out-patient clinic". After one year an internet-based survey will be sent out to the participants. In case of complains/signs of deficient healing after one year, the woman will be offered a clinical control. Data will be analyzed according to intention to treat and per-protocol".

NCT ID: NCT02836990 Completed - Wound Infection Clinical Trials

Prevena™ vs Dermabond in Groin Wound Infections in Vascular Surgery

Start date: July 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study evaluates the clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of Prevena Incision Management System versus Dermabond in preventing groin wound infections in patients who undergo vascular surgery requiring a groin wound. Half of the patients will receive Dermabond and the other half will receive the Prevena Incision Management System for their groin wounds.

NCT ID: NCT02809729 Completed - Breast Neoplasms Clinical Trials

Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Oncological Surgery of Breast

Start date: January 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy in the female population Brazilian, except non-melanoma skin tumors. Surgery plays an important role in regional spot disease control and the definition of parameters for the adjuvant treatment indication. Surgical site infections (SSI) are defined as wound infections occur following invasive procedures, corresponding to 14-16% of all infections nosocomial in hospitalized patients, the most common among patients surgical. SSIs should be examined as potential wound contamination surgical, understood as the number of micro-organisms in the body and / or tissue being operated. Considering this aspect, the cancer surgery breast are classified by their potential for contamination by clean. The use of antibiotics to prevent the SSI in mastectomies is not standardized in Handbook of National Health Surveillance Agency due to the effectiveness of undocumented prophylaxis Thus the use of antibiotics may vary among services. So this randomized clinical trial to evaluate the influence of the use of Prophylactic antibiotics in SSI rates in oncological breast surgery.

NCT ID: NCT02788942 Completed - Wound Infection Clinical Trials

The Removing Port of the Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Material

Start date: March 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is gold standard for gallstones. In this study the investigators are investigating the effect of the removing of cholecystectomy material from different ports, to the port site infections.

NCT ID: NCT02776774 Completed - Clinical trials for Surgical Wound Infection

Topical Antibiotic Treatment for Spine Surgical Site Infection

Start date: September 2015
Phase:
Study type: Observational

There is considerable interest in using in-wound antibiotics (IWA) to prevent infection after spine surgery. An adequate evaluation of IWA is lacking and prior studies are limited by confounding and bias. This prospective study will enroll spine surgeons across the country to complete a survey about their knowledge, attitudes, and practices for using in-wound antibiotics.

NCT ID: NCT02744144 Completed - Wounds and Injuries Clinical Trials

Wound Bacterial Microbiota and Their Antibiotic Resistance

Start date: September 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The purpose of the study is to explore the microbiology in war-associated wounds of hospitalized patients from the Syrian armed conflict. Cultures collected from acute wounds with clinical signs of infection will be analyzed.

NCT ID: NCT02735525 Completed - Clinical trials for Surgical Wound Infection

Feasibility Trial for Postoperative Wound Surveillance Using Smartphones

Start date: June 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The proposed trial is a pilot to test a smartphone application (app) that will ultimately allow patients to take and transmit photos of their postoperative wounds from home and relay other symptom information. This protocol covers the single-institution pilot study of the app's use in the period between hospital discharge and a patient's first follow-up clinic visit. The investigators will recruit vascular surgery patients either preoperatively in clinic or in the post-operative, pre-discharge period following surgery to participate in the pilot. Using a training protocol refined in the usability-testing phase of the project, patients will be trained to use the smartphone and the wound surveillance app prior to discharge. Patients will use the app from home to take send digital images of their postoperative wounds and answer a short survey, all of which will be transmitted to a secure database maintained by the University of Wisconsin (UW) Department of Surgery and accessible only to UW-employed study personnel. These data will be evaluated by one of three vascular surgery service nurse practitioners (NPs) daily and entered into the medical record. Patients who have concerning findings either in their images or in their survey answers will be contacted for further evaluation. Smartphones will be provided to patients who do not have one of their own, through a partnership with AT&T. Sociodemographic and comorbidity data collected from the medical record will be kept at UW Department of Surgery on a secure server and accessible only to UW employed study personnel.