Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04557761
Other study ID # 1912154
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 13, 2020
Est. completion date June 2023

Study information

Verified date March 2022
Source Children's Hospital of Orange County
Contact Theodore W Heyming, MD
Phone 714-543-8911
Email theyming@choc.org
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will gather information on the use of microMend® to repair lacerations in children and compare the efficacy of microMend® to sutures for laceration repair. microMend® has previously been shown to be less painful and easier to use than sutures, which are the current standard of care for primary wound closures. Results of this research will inform how the treatment of laceration repairs in the pediatric patient population.


Description:

Lacerations are typically closed with sutures, staples, tissue adhesives, or bandages. These methods come with several limitations, however. Sutures and staples can be painful, cause inflammation that can lead to scarring, and require return clinic visits for their removal. Tissue adhesives cannot be used to close wounds under tension, can be associated with inflammation, and carry a risk of wound dehiscence. Bandages are also only useful for closing superficial wounds under low tension. Therefore, there is a need for improved products to close wounds associated with laceration repair. The current study will use a prospective randomized controlled design to compare the use of sutures to microMend® to treat lacerations among children 7-17 years. Performance of sutures and microMend® will be assessed by investigators, providers and subjects. Participants will be randomized 1:1 between closure of lacerations with microMend® or sutures. Results from this study will help gather further information on the use of microMend® to close wounds in the pediatric population.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 30
Est. completion date June 2023
Est. primary completion date December 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 7 Years to 17 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Subjects undergoing a laceration repair that would require sutures, staples, or tissue adhesives to close the skin wound. - Age between 7 and 17 years old - Written informed consent obtained from Subject or Subject's legal representative - Ability of Subject to comply with the requirements of the study Exclusion Criteria: - Wound in extensor or flexor surface of knee or elbow - Wound on concave areas of the face, such as orbit of the nasal sidewall - Wound on fingers or toes - Wound under high tension - Wound that has a gap of more than 1 cm between the wound edges immediately prior to application of microMend devices - Facial or body hair that could impede application of the wound closure device - Wound with significant tissue injury - Wound with active bleeding - Wound where adjacent skin is wet - Visual evidence of active infection, contaminated or devitalized tissue, or rash at laceration location - Wound that contain a foreign body - Wound site that contains tattoo or other identifiable features - Subject with keloid(s) - Medical disorder that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could have a significant effect on wound healing - Pregnancy - Inability of Subject to carry out Subject instructions - Subject lacks the capacity to consent - Currently using medication that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could have a significant effect on wound healing - Skin disorder, such as psoriasis, or current dermatitis or eczema at wound site - History of keloids or scar hypertrophy - Known bleeding diathesis - Sensitivity or allergy to adhesives or medical tape - Active infection in any part of the body - Use of sutures or staples to close underlying skin layers - Use of staples to close skin wound - Use of tissue adhesive or other adhesives directly over the wound

Study Design


Intervention

Device:
microMend®
microMend® is a novel wound closure device that consists of arrays of tiny staples, known as Microstaples, which are attached to a backing material that is the size and shape of a butterfly closure. The Microstaples enable secure attachment of the device to the skin, allowing for the safe closure of wounds associated with surgery and traumatic injuries, such as lacerations. microMend is listed with the FDA and is available for sale in the United States.
Closure with Sutures
The Subject's laceration will be closed with sutures per regular institutional policies and procedures.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States CHOC Children's Orange California

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Children's Hospital of Orange County KitoTech Medical, Inc.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Investigator's Assessment of Wound Closure Device (Questionnaire) The investigator will complete a questionnaire about the wound. The questionnaire will capture information about the wound including the cause of laceration, approximate length of the wound, and whether subcutaneous sutures were used prior to application of micro Mend or sutures. The questionnaire will also indicate whether local anesthesia was used. During wound-closure performance
Primary Investigator's Assessment of Wound Closure Device (Survey) The investigator will rate the performance of the wound closure device using a survey to rate the ease of use, speed of use, wound appearance, and provide an overall rating for the experience of using the wound closure device. Each parameter will be determined to be Excellent, Good, Fair or Poor, which correspond to numerical ratings of 4, 3, 2, and 1, respectively. During wound-closure procedure
Secondary Total Procedure Time The investigator or designee will record the total procedure time from the initiation of anesthesia (if used) to completion of closure of the laceration. During wound-closure procedure
Secondary Wound Closure Time The investigator or designee will record the time of the wound closure portion of the procedure measured from initiation of first suture or microMend application to completion of the closure. During wound-closure procedure
Secondary Subject assessment of level of pain during wound closure procedure The Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) is used to measure endpoints on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 and 10 representing both extremes. To perform the evaluation, the Subject is asked to place a mark on a straight line that has a 0 on the left end and a 10 on the right end of the line. A score of 0 will indicate no pain, while a score of 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable. The VAS Score for level of pain during the wound closure procedure will be collected on the day of the wound closure procedure (Study Day 0).
Secondary Comparison of Provider's rating of wound closure results with microMend to suture The provider will compare wound closure results between microMend and sutures at the first return clinic visit. 1 month after wound-closure procedure
Secondary Subject assessment of level of stress during wound closure procedure The VAS Score is used to measure endpoints on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 and 10 representing both extremes. To perform the evaluation, the Subject is asked to place a mark on a straight line that has a 0 on the left end and a 10 on the right end of the line. A score of 0 will indicate no stress, while a score of 10 indicates the worst stress imaginable. The VAS Score for level of stress during the wound closure procedure will be collected on the day of the wound closure procedure (Study Day 0).
Secondary The VAS Score for level of stress during the wound closure procedure will be collected on the day of the wound closure procedure (Study Day 0). The VAS Score is used to measure endpoints on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 and 10 representing both extremes. To perform the evaluation, the Subject is asked to place a mark on a straight line that has a 0 on the left end and a 10 on the right end of the line. A score of 0 will indicate no pain, while a score of 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable. The VAS Score for level of pain during removal of the wound closure device will be collected at the First Return Clinic Visit, Day 5 (5-7) for facial lacerations or Day 8 (7-10) for lacerations elsewhere on the body.
Secondary Subject assessment of level of stress during removal of wound closure device The VAS Score is used to measure endpoints on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 and 10 representing both extremes. To perform the evaluation, the Subject is asked to place a mark on a straight line that has a 0 on the left end and a 10 on the right end of the line. A score of 0 will indicate no stress, while a score of 10 indicates the worst stress imaginable. The VAS Score for level of stress during removal of the wound closure device will be collected on the day of the wound closure procedure (Study Day 0).
Secondary Visual Assessment of wound in individual Subjects taken both before and after application of wound closure device At least two (2) photographs of each wound will be taken before and after application of wound closure device. An Independent Plastic Surgeon will rate wound appearance and cosmetic results on a 0-10 scale, where 10 indicates the best possible appearance and results, while a score of 0 indicates the worst possible results.product. Photographs will be taken both before and after application of the wound closure device on the day of the wound closure procedure (Day 0). Photographs will be reviewed by an Independent Plastic Surgeon to assess wound appearance and cosmetic results.
Secondary Visual Assessment of wound in individual Subjects taken both before and after removal of wound closure device At least two (2) photographs of each wound will be taken before and after application of wound closure device. An Independent Plastic Surgeon will rate wound appearance and cosmetic results on a 0-10 scale, where 10 indicates the best possible appearance and results, while a score of 0 indicates the worst possible results. Photographs will be taken both before and after removal of the wound closure device on the day of the wound closure procedure (Day 5-7 for facial lacerations, Day 7-10 for lacerations elsewhere on the body). Photographs will be reviewed by an Independent
Secondary Visual Assessment of wound after 1 Month At least two (2) photographs of each wound will be taken 1 month after initial application of the wound closure device. An Independent Plastic Surgeon will rate wound appearance and cosmetic results on a 0-10 scale, where 10 indicates the best possible appearance and results, while a score of 0 indicates the worst possible results. A minimum of two photographs of each wound will be taken 1 month after initial application of the wound closure device. Photographs will be reviewed by an Independent Plastic Surgeon to assess wound appearance and cosmetic results.
Secondary Visual Assessment of wound after 3 Months At least two (2) photographs of each wound will be taken 3 months after initial application of the wound closure device. An Independent Plastic Surgeon will rate wound appearance and cosmetic results on a 0-10 scale, where 10 indicates the best possible appearance and results, while a score of 0 indicates the worst possible results. A minimum of two photographs of each wound will be taken 3 months after initial application of the wound closure device. Photographs will be reviewed by an Independent Plastic Surgeon to assess wound appearance and cosmetic results.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05023135 - DeepView SnapShot Portable (DV-SSP): Device Training Study
Recruiting NCT03459547 - Soft Peri-implant Tissue Around Different Abutment Materials N/A
Recruiting NCT05608187 - Evaluating Safety and Biological Effect on Wound Healing of ILP100-Topical in Subjects With Diabetic Foot Ulcers Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT03649308 - Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Compared to Traditional Care After Skin Grafting N/A
Recruiting NCT04596124 - Effectiveness and Tolerability of Fitostimoline Plus Cream and Gauze vs Connettivina Bio Plus Cream and Gauze N/A
Completed NCT03285542 - Prospective Randomized Trial of Dermabond Prineo in Total Knee Arthroplasty N/A
Recruiting NCT05474911 - PILONIDAL SINUS: CONVENTIONAL CARE VERSUS NEGATIVE PRESSURE THERAPY. N/A
Recruiting NCT05689775 - Reconstruction After Abdominoperineal Resection With Robot-assisted Harvest of VRAM Flap
Recruiting NCT04849143 - The Effectiveness of Stingless Bee Honey (Kelulut Honey) Versus Gel in Diabetic Wound Bed Preparation N/A
Completed NCT03596112 - The Difference in Wound Size Reduction Comparing Two Frequently Used Wound Dressings in Everyday Care N/A
Recruiting NCT05169814 - Micro/Nanobubbles (MNBs) for Treatment of Acute and Chronic Wounds Early Phase 1
Completed NCT04545476 - Enhanced Secondary Intention Healing vs. Standard Secondary Intention Healing in Mohs Surgical Defects on the Head and Distal Lower Extremities N/A
Completed NCT06020157 - Comparison of Simple and Continuous Suture Techniques in Oral Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT05133570 - Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Treatment With Vista Care®, in Arterial Ulcers of the Lower Extremities
Recruiting NCT04901325 - Baricitinib in the Treatment of Adults With Pyoderma Gangrenosum (PG) Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT03668665 - Influencing Wound Healing Through the Application of Hyaluronic Acid With Perfluorodecalin and Physalis Angulata Extract After Split Skin Removal From the Thigh - A Study in "Split Wound Design" Phase 3
Completed NCT03703479 - Effect of A-PRF After Removal of Wisdom Teeth N/A
Recruiting NCT03204851 - Microlyte Dressing in the Management of Wounds N/A
Recruiting NCT06117436 - Impact of Cilostazol Versus Cilostazol and Selenium Combination on the Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT05618912 - Scar Appearance After Postoperative Hydrocolloid Dressing Versus Standard Petrolatum Ointment N/A