View clinical trials related to Virus Diseases.
Filter by:Molecular techniques for respiratory virus detection have already shown benefits in terms of sensitivity gained in comparison to conventional techniques. Recent progress has made it possible to shorten turnaround time (TAT) and to allow delivery of results in a timely manner, especially in comparison to cell culture and direct fluorescence assays (DFA). However, the cost of these molecular assays is usually not taken in charge by public health insurance system. This could be partly explained by the fact that molecular techniques have not clearly shown cost-effectiveness. Results of molecular tests for influenza viruses and RSV, if delivered rapidly, in the emergency room (ER), would most likely help avoid antibiotic use and ancillary test prescription, improve antiviral prescription and shorten length of stay in the ward by facilitating discharge or cohorting of hospitalized patients. The goal of this study is to assess the performances of Roche Cobas® Liat Influenza A/B & RSV assay, to appraise its clinical impact and to evaluate its cost effectiveness.
This phase I trial tests the feasibility and safety of genetically modified cytotoxic T-lymphocytes in controlling infections caused by adenovirus (ADV), BK virus (BKV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), JC virus (JCV), or COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients with cancer. Viral infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and therapeutic options for these infections are often complicated by associated toxicities. Genetically modified cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) are designed to kill a specific virus that can cause infections. Depending on which virus a patient is infected with (ADV, BKV, CMV, JCV, or COVID-19), the CTLs will be designed to specifically attack that virus. Giving genetically modified CTLs may help to control the infection.
SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for COVID-19. Today, RT-PCR performed on a nasopharyngeal sample remains the gold standard for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, several other assays have been developed to increase testing capabilities and provide rapid screening strategies such as antigenic lateral flow assays. Most recommended tests to date are based nasopharyngeal sampling that is often poorly tolerated by patients and associated with a significant risk of infection for the sampler. Saliva can be used but provide slightly lower sensitivities depending of the subsequent assay use with those samples. The detection of the N antigen of SARS-CoV-2, by ELISA or rapid immunochromatographic technique, on a serum or blood sample would make it possible to overcome these constraints and to provide a new testing alternative. ELISA tests are faster, cheaper and easier to automate than molecular biology approaches. Blood sampling may be easier to perform in certain populations (in particular in hospitalized patients who already benefit from blood sampling, blood donors, etc.), require less equipment, and is better tolerated (immunocompromised patients subject to blood sampling repeated), and can be integrated more systematically into assessments carried out at the entrance to hospitals or in town, etc. If the N-antigen levels in blood are sufficient, rapid antigen assay on capillary blood could also provide useful testing alternatives. In a pilot study conducted at Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital, the sensitivity of the first available commercial test was estimated at 93% (95% CI, 84.7-100), and its specificity at 98% (95% CI, 85.3-100). The main objective of the current work is to evaluate the sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 N antigen detection in the serum compared to nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR in several populations such as symptomatic hospitalized patients, symptomatic non-hospitalized patients and asymptomatic subjects. For each detection kit evaluated, the primary endpoint is the sensitivity (and its 95% confidence interval) of the detection of SARS-CoV-2 N antigen in serum overall and in those populations. The specificity will also be assess.
The investigators aim to assess the effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) for 12 weeks in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients who fail to prior NS5A-containing DAA regimens and HCV genotype 1a and 3 patients who fail to prior non-NS5A-containing DAA regimen in Taiwan on a basis of a multicenter observational study.
World increase in mortality from consequences of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a significant public health problem. Irrational prescribing of antimicrobial drugs (AMD) in general population is one of the main causes of development AMR. This is also contributed by fact that up to 90% of total antimicrobial consumption in Europe is related to the general population. Problem of AMR has been recognized by World Health Organization and Council of European Union, which support the establishment of the antimicrobial stewardship team (A-team). A-team provides co-ordinated interventions that promote rational use of AMD. To date, no study has been carried out in which A-team from hospital environment goes to primary health care for the purpose of rationalization prescribing of AMD by primary health care practitioners. Project for implementation of hospital A-team in primary health care in Koprivnica-Križevci County was initiated using academic detailing method aimed at rationalization of the consumption of AMD.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of a newly developed point-of-care analyzer, theCytoTracker, to measure complete blood count (CBC) parameters and discriminate between viral and bacterial infections.
This study is designed to test the efficacy and safety of combinations of two well-understood agents - famotidine and celecoxib in patients hospitalized with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 (based on World Health Organization [WHO] Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement). Both famotidine and celecoxib separately demonstrate clinical activity in mitigating COVID-19 disease symptoms or severity, and appear to have separate and complementary mechanisms of action.
The main objective of this study is to find out whether young MSM (men who have sex with men) believe it is important for their GP to be informed of their sexual orientation, in order to improve their clinical, especially with HPV vaccination. The secondary objective is to analyze the state of knowledge about the HPV vaccine and the value of HPV vaccine in this target population.
This study is designed to test the efficacy and safety of combinations of two well-understood agents - famotidine and celecoxib. Each of these agents separately demonstrate clinical activity in mitigating COVID-19 disease symptoms or severity, and each of which appear to have separate and complementary mechanisms of action.
This master protocol serves as a common reference for the inpatient and outpatient clinical studies that share common elements.