Clinical Trials Logo

Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03092557 Completed - Clinical trials for Mechanical Ventilation Complication

A New Ultrasonographic Tool to Assess Regional Pulmonary Strain

Start date: July 24, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study is designed to assess the feasibility of the measurement of local pleural strain at 4 different anatomical sites. The secondary objectives of the study are: - To assess intra- and inter-observer variability in the measurement of local pleural strain - To identify the strain parameters demonstrating the most clinically relevant and the most significant correlation with a change in tidal volume Hypothesis: The analysis of lung ultrasonographic sequences using speckle-tracking allows the determination of local pleural strain in 4 predetermined pulmonary areas.

NCT ID: NCT03061617 Completed - Thoracic Surgery Clinical Trials

Comparison of Different Ventilation Mode During One-lung Ventilation

Start date: July 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

It is controversial as to which ventilation mode is better in one-lung ventilation(OLV), volume controlled ventilation(VCV) or pressure controlled ventilation(PCV). This study was designed to figure out if there was any difference between these two modes on oxygenation and postoperative complications under the condition of protective ventilation(PV).

NCT ID: NCT03056885 Completed - Clinical trials for Inflammatory Response

Inflammatory Local Response During OLV: Protective vs Conventional Ventilation Strategy

Start date: November 2, 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study evaluates the local cytokine inflammatory response during one lung ventilation in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy or wedge resection. We compare two different ventilation strategies: a conventional strategy with a protective strategy.

NCT ID: NCT03041428 Completed - Clinical trials for Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury

Ultra Protective Ventilation During Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (UPV-ECMO)

UPV-ECMO
Start date: February 1, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Mechanical ventilation, in spite of being a life-saving technique, can also induce lung injury (VILI) mediated by an inflammatory response, thus having a profound impact in the course of critically ill patients. Ventilatory strategies aimed to minimize this VILI have reduced mortality rates. Patients suffering cardiogenic pulmonary edema may need venoarterial extracorporeal oxygenation, at the same time they are being mechanically ventilated. The objective of this study is to analyze changes induced by the use of utraprotective ventilatory strategies in the inflammatory lung response of these patients and their impact on outcomes.

NCT ID: NCT02732041 Completed - Clinical trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult

Asynchrony During Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Start date: May 25, 2016
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Asynchrony during mechanical ventilation has been poorly described in patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome. The purpose of this study is to describe the frequency of asynchronies (ineffective efforts and double triggering) in these group and evaluate potential risk factors and prognosis implications.

NCT ID: NCT02670460 Completed - Clinical trials for Ventilator Induced Lung Injury

Percutaneous Temporary Placement of a Phrenic Nerve Stimulator for Diaphragm Pacing, a First in Human Trial

Start date: October 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Study conducted to confirm phrenic nerve stimulation using the Lungpacer LIVE Catheter, confirm capture of the diaphragm and confirm that the diaphragm can be paced in synchrony with mechanical ventilator breaths.

NCT ID: NCT02386683 Completed - Clinical trials for Ventilator-induced Lung Injury

Intraoperative Lung-Protective Ventilation in Neurosurgery

Start date: October 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to explore the effectiveness of lung-protective ventilation during general anesthesia for neurosurgical procedures on postoperative pulmonary outcome, compared with traditional ventilation.

NCT ID: NCT02342756 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult

Esophageal Pressure-Guided Optimal PEEP/mPaw in CMV and HFOV: The EPOCH Study

EPOCH
Start date: January 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been shown to prevent the cycling end-expiratory collapse during mechanical ventilation and to maintain alveolar recruitment, keeping lung portions open, increasing the resting end-expiratory volume. On the other hand PEEP may also overdistend the already open lung, increasing stress and strain. Theoretically high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) could be considered an ideal strategy in patients with ARDS for the small tidal volumes, but the expected benefits have not been shown yet. PEEP and HFOV should be tailored on individual physiology. Assuming that the esophageal pressure is a good estimation of pleural pressure, transpulmonary pressure can be estimated by the difference between airway pressure and esophageal pressure (PL= Paw - Pes). A PL of 0 cmH2O at end-expiration should keep the airways open (even if distal zones are not certainly recruited) and a PL of 15 cmH2O should produce an overall increase of lung recruitment. The investigators want to determine whether the prevention of atelectrauma by setting PEEP and mPaw to obtain 0 cmH2O of transpulmonary pressure at end expiratory volume is less injurious than lung recruitment limiting tidal overdistension by setting PEEP and mPaw at a threshold of 15 cmH2O of transpulmonary pressure. The comparison between conventional ventilation with tidal volume of 6 ml/Kg and HFOV enables us to understand the role of different tidal volumes on preventing atelectrauma and inducing lung recruitment. The use of non-invasive bedside techniques such as lung ultrasound, electrical impedance tomography, and transthoracic echocardiography are becoming necessary in ICU and may allow us to distinguish between lung recruitment and tidal overdistension at different PEEP/mPaw settings, in order to limit pulmonary and hemodynamic complications during CMV and HFOV.

NCT ID: NCT02071277 Completed - Clinical trials for Respiratory Insufficiency

APRV/BIPAP With Spontaneous Breathing on Lung Protection

APRV/BIPAP
Start date: March 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a cornerstone of management of acute respiratory failure, but MV per se can provoke ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), especially in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Lung protective ventilation strategy has been proved to prevent VILI by using low tidal volume of 6-8 ml/kg of ideal body weight and limiting plateau pressure to less than 30 cmH2O. However, heavy sedation or even paralysis are frequently used to ensure the protective ventilation strategy, both of which are associated with respiratory muscles weakness. Maintaining of spontaneous breathing may decrease the need of sedative drug and improve gas exchange by promoting lung recruitment. Pressure-targeted mode is the most frequent way of delivering after 48 hours of initiating MV. Three types of pressure-controlled mode are available in intubated patients: Biphasic Intermittent Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP), Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV), and Pressure-Assist Controlled Ventilation (also called BIPAPassist). They are based on pressure regulation but have the difference in terms of synchronization between the patient and the ventilator. The different working principle of these modes may result in different breathing pattern and consequently different in tidal volume and transpulmonary pressure, which may be potentially harmful. The investigators bench study with a lung model demonstrated higher tidal volume and transpulmonary pressure with the BIPAPassist over APRV despite similar pressure settings and patient's simulated effort. However, the impact of each mode on the delivered tidal volume and the transpulmonary pressure in spontaneously breathing mechanically ventilated patients is currently unknown. Their hypothesis is that when the investigators compare the three pressure-controlled modes, the asynchronous mode (APRV) will result in more protective ventilation strategy over the two other modes (BIPAP and BIPAPassist).

NCT ID: NCT02025075 Completed - Clinical trials for Postoperative Complications

Hemodynamic and Respiratory Variations During Laparoscopic Surgery With and Without Deep Neuromuscular Blockade.

Start date: January 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The goal of this study is to investigate the effect of depth of neuromuscular block (NMB) on global and regional (dependent versus nondependent) respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic surgery. Furthermore, we will investigate if the level of NMB influences intraoperative hemodynamic and cerebral oxygenation.