Clinical Trials Logo

Vaginal Hysterectomy clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Vaginal Hysterectomy.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT05921071 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Vaginal Hysterectomy

Do Patients Who Received Tranexamic Acid in Vaginal Hysterectomy Loose Les Blood, Comparing to Patients Who Did Not?

Start date: January 22, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a randomized control, double-blind study in which women who are about to go an elective vaginal hysterectomy are offered to participate. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: the tranexamic acid group, in which 1 gram of tranexamic acid (Hexakapron) is administered intravenously before surgery, and the control group, in which patients will receive 10 ml of normal saline 0.9% intravenously.

NCT ID: NCT05418764 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Vaginal Hysterectomy

Effect of Validated Skills Simulation With the Miya Model

Start date: December 27, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Simulation training with the Miya Model will improve Operating Room performance of Vaginal Hysterectomy (VH) in novice surgeons and this phase of the study is designed to test that.

NCT ID: NCT04886791 Recruiting - Hysterectomy Clinical Trials

Vaginal NOTES Hysterectomy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy

VANH
Start date: July 5, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Rationale: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a minimal invasive technique using the natural body orifices like stomach, oesophagus, bladder, rectum and vagina to access the human body for surgery. In 2012, the first vaginal NOTES (vNOTES) hysterectomy was performed. Potential benefits of vNOTES hysterectomy, also called the vaginal assisted NOTES hysterectomy (VANH) are no visible scars, less pain and a shorter hospital stay compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy as shown in the HALON trial. Up to now, no studies have compared the vNOTES hysterectomy with vaginal hysterectomy. Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the vNOTES hysterectomy with the vaginal hysterectomy for same day-discharge (SDD), complications, treatment related outcomes, post-operative recovery, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Study design: The study concerns a single-blinded, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Study population: Eligible women who fulfill the inclusion criteria and will undergo a hysterectomy for benign indication. Intervention: The study population will be randomly allocated to the VANH-group, who undergo a vaginal assisted NOTES hysterectomy (intervention group) or the vaginal hysterectomy group (control-group) and the participants will be single blinded. The pre- and postoperative care will be the same for both groups. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome is the percentage of patients that underwent the hysterectomy as in SDD setting. A total of 41 patients should be included in the control group and a total of 83 patients in the intervention group, using an enrollment ratio of 1:2, with an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 0.8. The secondary outcomes are complications, treatment related outcomes, post-operative recovery, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: vNOTES is a new surgical technique, but a combination of two existing techniques namely the vaginal hysterectomy and the laparoscopic hysterectomy. Only one randomized controlled trial has been published, comparing the total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) with the VANH, which shows no inferiority of the vNOTES technique compared to a laparoscopy. A recent case series study has been published about the complication rate in VANH. There was a total complication rate in the hysterectomy group of 5.2%, in which 1.4% was intra-operative and 3.8% postoperative. Theoretically it is possible that the VANH causes less intra-operative complications because of an improved view during the procedure. No further literature is known about VH versus VANH. Participants of the study should fill in multiple questionnaires before randomization and postoperative about their general health, pain experience and used analgesics.

NCT ID: NCT04797585 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Vaginal Hysterectomy

Vaginal Hysterectomy vs Supracervical Hysterectomy at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy

Coloplast LSC
Start date: March 16, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary objective of the proposed study is to determine the difference in surgical time between minimally invasive (laparoscopic) sacrocolpopexy performed with concurrent vaginal hysterectomy versus laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. The secondary objectives are to determine if there are differences in intraoperative adverse events and postoperative mesh-related complications and prolapse recurrence between the groups.

NCT ID: NCT04251923 Not yet recruiting - Quality of Life Clinical Trials

Vaginal Prolapse Surgery Accompanied by Mid Urethral Sling Versus no Sling for Reduction of Postoperative Incontinence

Start date: January 2020
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapsed is high in Nepal. After prolapse surgery many patients are affected with incontinence. Incontinence has physical, social and mental effect to the individual. This study is designed to know the role for mid urethral sling during vaginal prolapse surgery to decrease the rate of incontinence after the surgery.

NCT ID: NCT03907033 Terminated - Clinical trials for Vaginal Hysterectomy

Liposomal Bupivacaine in Vaginal Hysterectomy

Start date: September 3, 2019
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of preemptive analgesia using liposomal bupivacaine mixed with bupivacaine HCl, versus bupivacaine HCl alone for uterosacral ligament injection in patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy. We hypothesize that the group receiving a combination of liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine HCl will report superior postoperative pain management. Enhancement in pain control should confer a decrease in opioid and other analgesic medication requirements, which may contribute to decreased nausea, vomiting, and higher overall patient satisfaction with pain control.

NCT ID: NCT03883347 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Vaginal Hysterectomy

Sedation With Dexmedetomidine Versus Remifentanil in Urogynecological Surgery Under Spinal Anaesthesia

Start date: March 20, 2019
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Neuraxial blocks are usually used as an anaesthetic method for urogynecological surgeries. In most patients under regional anaesthesia, premedication is given for reducing anxiety. Purpose of this prospective double blind randomised clinical trial is the investigation of the effect of perioperative intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine vs remifentanil for sedation in patients under spinal anaesthesia for urogynecological procedures.

NCT ID: NCT03446950 Completed - Surgery Clinical Trials

Study Investigating Role of Unalike Patient Positioning on PROMIS Scores

STIRUPPS
Start date: March 6, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary objective is to assess the impact of patient positioning using the candy cane stirrups as compared to boot stirrups on physical functioning outcomes at 6 weeks post-op

NCT ID: NCT03228654 Terminated - Clinical trials for Vaginal Hysterectomy

Electrosurgical Unipolar Vessel Sealing in Vaginal Hysterectomy

Start date: August 1, 2016
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Hysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in gynecologic practice. Inspiteof the development of alternative treatments, the incidence of hysterectomy doesn't appear to be declining. Routes for hysterectomy include abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic or combined approaches.Vaginal hysterectomy is the method of choice for removal of the uterus in patients with benign gynecological diseases. A Cochrane review of surgical approaches to hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases concluded that, wee possible vaginal hysterectomy should be performed in preference to abdominal hysterectomy.

NCT ID: NCT01079754 Recruiting - Pain Clinical Trials

0.05 Versus 0.1 mg Spinal Morphine for Reducing Morphine Requirement After Vaginal Hysterectomy

Start date: March 2010
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This study aims to compare the efficacy of 0.05 mg and 0.1 mg spinal morphine in reducing postoperative morphine requirement in patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with/without anterior and posterior vaginoplasty.