View clinical trials related to Upper Limb.
Filter by:The performance of activities of daily living (ADL) depends to a large extent on the functionality of the upper limb and hand. Stroke is the leading cause of disability worldwide, with a significant individual, family and economic impact. After a stroke event, however, a large percentage of affected patients have a deficit of the hand and, six months after the acute event, 65% of patients with a deficit of the hand are unable to use and integrate the affected hand in activities of daily living, significantly reducing its quality. The impairment of strength, grip and general hand function makes it difficult to perform ADLs and affects the independence of functional activities, making the recovery of hand function an extremely challenging field in stroke rehabilitation.
The investigators propose to evaluate the efficacy of MyoTrain AR in a prospective clinical study involving 10 individuals with trans-radial upper-limb loss over a period of 35 days. These individuals will be randomized to Group A (Control Group using conventional motor imagery exercises) and Group B (who will train with the MyoTrain AR system pre-prosthetically). The investigators will test the following hypothesis: Pre-prosthetic training with the MyoTrain AR system, as compared to the current standard of care with conventional motor imagery exercises, results in improved subsequent control stability with the prosthesis. Following a baseline functional assessment, participants will undergo a 30-day pre-prosthetic training period specific to their assigned Group. After this training period, participants will repeat the functional assessment. Participants will then receive their prosthetic device and occupational therapy consistent with the current clinical care standard, after which they will again undergo a battery of validated, clinical assessments.
The investigators propose to evaluate the efficacy of MyoTrain in a prospective clinical study involving 16 individuals with trans-radial upper-limb loss over a period of 206 days. These individuals will be randomized to Group A (Control Group using standard motor imagery training) and Group B (who are provided the MyoTrain system). The investigators will test three hypotheses: 1. The use of MyoTrain results in skills transference to control of the final prosthesis 2. The virtual outcome measures in MyoTrain are correlated with real-world functional outcome measures 3. The use of MyoTrain results in improved clinical outcomes as measured by functional, subjective and usage metrics Following a baseline functional assessment, participants will undergo a 30-day pre-prosthetic training period specific to their assigned Group. After this training period, participants will receive their prosthetic device and occupational therapy consistent with the current clinical care standard, after which they will again undergo clinical assessment. Post-device delivery, participants will then complete 3 56-day blocks of at-home prosthesis use, in between which they will return to clinic for assessment.
The proposed clinical trial will employ the NEUROExos Elbow Module (NEEM), an active robotic exoskeleton, for the passive mobilization and active training of elbow flexion and extension in 60 sub-acute and chronic stroke patients with motor impairments (hemiparesis and/or spasticity) of the right arm. The study protocol is a randomized controlled trial consisting of a 4-week functional rehabilitation program, with both clinical and robotically instrumented assessments to be conducted at baseline and post-treatment.
This is a post-market, open-label, prospective, multi-center, observational study evaluating upper limb pain relief with the DTM™ SCS programming approach. Data at follow-up visits will be compared to baseline assessments collected at the beginning of the study.
This study will compare the use of RESCU [Experimental] Prosthesis with a [Standard] pattern recognition prosthesis in a clinical setting and in unsupervised daily activity. The protocol will follow a single case experimental design (SCED) to compensate for the limited size of the patient population. Each of the participants will use the Standard and Experimental and systems over a 35-day period. The Standard system will include at least two controllable DoFs (hand, wrist, multi-articulated hand, etc) and a commercially-available pattern recognition controller. The RESCU system will use the same components as the Standard system but will differ with respect to incorporating eight IBT Element Electrodes (as required for pattern recognition control) and the RESCU control software. The hypothesis is that pattern recognition will outperform the commercially-available control strategy for most participants on in-clinic, at-home usage, and subjective measures.
Introduction. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common neurological disease causing disability in young adults. Neurorehabilitation is a fundamental aspect in the treatment approach for MS, in which new technologies have gained popularity, especially the use of virtual reality (VR), thanks to the therapeutic possibilities offered for patients with MS presenting cognitive, sensitive and motor dysfunctions. Aim. To analyze and compare an occupational therapy intervention (OT) compared with OT + VR (OT+VR) on the manual dexterity of patients with MS. Material and methods. 26 patients will be recruited. The control group (n=8) will recieve 20 conventional OT sessions distributed in two sessions per week. The experimental group OT+VR (n=8) will recieve 20 sessions of VR interventions, twice weekly and lasting 30 minutes, consisting of VR games accessed via the online webpage motiongamingconsole.com, including Flip Out, Air Hockey, Partículas, Dunkit, Cuenta peces and Robo Maro, in addition to the conventional OT sessions. Pre and post-intervention assessments will be based on the Purdue Pegboard Test, the Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test and the Grooved Pegboard Test.