View clinical trials related to Tooth Extraction.
Filter by:The aim is to comparatively evaluate the soft tissue volume changes that occur after tooth extraction and immediate dental implant placement using two different surgical techniques. These techniques are: the Socket-Shield technique and conventional immediate placement. The null hypothesis is that the Socket-Shield technique better maintains soft tissue volume after partial tooth extraction and immediate implant placement compared to the conventional technique. From a sample of 20 patients, they will be divided into groups of 10 and will be randomized using the random.org program. The soft tissue volume will be digitally recorded by intraoral scanning before tooth extraction and 6 months later. The soft tissue dimensional changes produced will be digitally evaluated and statistically analyzed.
The resorption of alveolar ridge after tooth extraction develop difficulty in restoring the extraction area with implant or bridge. Therefore, try to preserve the alveolar ridge width and height at extraction socket and gaining its bone volume in maximal is worth for clinical investigation. There are several method to deal with alveolar ridge preservation (ARP), the most popular way for its approach, the trend is toward to minimally invasive treatment. Alveolar ridge preservation which is done with open-healed wound without primary closure is the key for minimally invasive approach. This three-armed randomized clinical trial would like to determine the effect of applying ribose cross-linked collagen membrane without primary flap closure in molar extraction sockets for alveolar ridge preservation. The procedure is for implant site development. Three groups were designed as test group1 was grafted with freeze dried bone allograft (FDBA) and covered by ribose cross-linked collagen membrane (OSSIX® PLUS). In test group2 sockets filled with collagen plug(Teruplug®) and sockets healed naturally as control group. Cone-beam computed tomography(CBCT) scans are obtained immediately and 4 months after ARP as the primary outcome and secondary outcome. A biopsy from implant site and histomorphometric analysis will be done as well. The change of marginal bone level and the width/height of keratinized mucosa are measured.
The aim of the present study is to investigate whether there has been a change of criteria for tooth extraction at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (TUSDM) from 2005 to 2018. The primary outcome is the change of mean of radiographic interproximal bone loss of extracted teeth. The secondary outcomes are changes of other parameters (periodontal, endodontic and restorative) of extracted teeth and reasons for extraction.
Wisdom tooth extraction is the most common surgical procedure being carried out in oral surgical departments. The complications carried by post operative period include pain and trismus and may affect patient's quality of life. PRP is an autologous concentrate of platelet in plasma and accelerate healing by production of growth factors. PRP is prepared from patient's own blood and later packed with gel sponge (Spongistone) in the experimental group immediately after surgical extraction of mandibular third molar teeth, followed by suture placement to close the surgical site.
In this non-interventional study (NIS) a polyamide non-absorbable suture (Dafilon) will be evaluated for oral surgery (mucosal closure after e.g. wisdom teeth extraction, implant surgery, etc.) in adult patients
The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to compare in delayed and immediately placed implants, the marginal vertical bone loss at 4 sides of the implant (buccal, palatal, mesial and distal), as well as the buccal and palatal bone thickness reduction at 3 months after loading.
In the complexity of the Dental care the third molar surgery is one of the most common procedures, it is indicated for multiple reasons like infections in root canal, prosthetics or even esthetical purposes. This surgery can be safely performed with the help of local anesthetics, due to their quick action, and reversibility to control pain, reducing possible complications during and after the surgeries. Among the different types of local anesthetics used in dentistry, the articaine bears characteristics that provide some advantages compared to similar anesthetics like Lidocaine, being one of the most used anesthetics worldwide. Different authors have concluded that it is a safe when used in patients at different ages and it is effective as a local anesthetic in the majority of procedures. It is important for dentists to know the differences or similarities of anesthetics in terms of their effects, safety, dosages required in patients undergoing surgical removal of teeth, as well as the mechanism of action and pharmacological properties, in order to take advantage of its benefits and minimize risks. This study aims to test the efficacy and safety of an anesthetic solution, based on the same active molecule, articaine, manufactured by two different commercial houses, one domestic and one international, in order to gather scientific evidence and to show that they are not different. This will provide scientific results to help in the selection of any of these brands to be used with confidence in the dental practice. This will strengthen the collaboration between the academy and the companies, which would allow them to improve the quality of their products. Locally there are no studies available comparing the articaine-type anesthetic with epinephrine at the same concentration, manufactured locally by a national company, to a foreign one, which is an important opportunity to expand the knowledge and create scientific reports, about what a local anesthetic is and what it does. Finally, this study would contribute to the need to guarantee the quality of medicines in Colombia, by means of compliance with the legal provisions contemplated in resolution 1890 of November 2001 and 1400 of August 2001, issued by the Ministry of Health of Colombia : "Requirements to demonstrate the therapeutic effectiveness, through studies of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence of medicines for a special group of them.
Evaluation of the efficacy of amox+clav and of a probiotic after tooth extraction. the aim is to evaluate efficacy of antibiotic therapy after tooth extractions in preventing infections as compared to no therapy, and efficacy of probiotics in preventing gastro-intestinal adverse effects during the antibiotic treatment. The number of patients to be included is 150. The study products are: Amoxicillin + Clavulanic Acid and Bifidobacterium Longum and Lactoferrin.
This is a qualitative study, using Grounded Theory. The aim is to deepen our knowledge about how children perceive pain in conjunction with dental treatment; tooth extractions in particular. What increases, and what decreases, the risk of children experiencing pain; and how do they perceive dental treatments where pain might occur, either as procedural pain, or postoperatively?
This study evaluates the clinical and biological effects of leucocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) on post-extraction sockets healing.