View clinical trials related to Surgery.
Filter by:To investigate whether preoperative supplement with high-dose vitamin D3 can reduce the perioperative risk and enhance recovery
Study the effect of laparoscopic guided TAP block on opioid consumption and associated costs using a mixture of dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, and ropivacaine versus Liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel®) in patients who undergo elective minimally invasive colorectal surgery.
The aim of this study is to assess pain response after combining stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and pedicle screw fixation in a 48-hour window for the treatment of painful unstable metastases of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine.
This trial is to determine the effect of Tranexamic Acid (TXA) on blood loss during endoscopic pituitary surgery. The hypothesis of this study is that TXA will reduce blood loss during surgery compared to a placebo. To answer this hypothesis, the investigators are conducting a randomized controlled trial in which half of participants will receive TXA and half will receive placebo (saline) in a double blind fashion.
To evaluate the surgical stress response in anterior cruciate ligament repair with an adductor canal block versus patient controlled endovenous analgesia.
Compare the experience of patients receiving an "optimized" preoperative anesthesia consultation (PAC) performed by a Nurse Anesthetist (supervised by an anesthetist) to those receiving a "standard" CSA ( CSA by an anesthetist alone).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and outcomes, such as postoperative dysuria (pain during urination), urgency (frequent need to urinate) and urinary incontinence (leaking urine or inability to hold urine), of 3 different HoLEP laser settings.
SPRINT PNS System will be offered to patients with postoperative knee pain following primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who meet eligibility criteria and consistent with established coverage policy. SPRINT PNS System will be implanted for 60 days. At the discretion of the physician, the first lead may be placed to stimulate the nerve innervating the region of greatest pain. If pain is not adequately addressed by the first lead when assessed at 10 days, a second lead may be placed approximately 2 weeks following the initial lead placement.
Rationale: The rapidly increasing number of elderly (≥ 65 years old) with traumatic brain injury (TBI) is accompanied by substantial medical and economic consequences. An intracranial hematoma, specifically an acute subdural hematoma (ASDH), is the most common injury in elderly with TBI. The surgical versus conservative treatment of this patient group remains an important clinical and moral dilemma, since it is in most cases unclear which treatment leads to a better outcome for the patient. Current guidelines are not based on high-quality evidence and compliance is low, allowing for large treatment variation in both Belgium and the Netherlands for patients with a traumatic ASDH. In addition, elderly are underrepresented in scientific TBI literature and are therefore not included in current guidelines or prognostic models, leading to major uncertainty in (neurosurgical) decision-making for this group. As participants in two large TBI research projects (CENTER-TBI, Net-QuRe), the investigators observe that the uncertainty regarding treatment of elderly with a traumatic ASDH will not be solved by the current ongoing studies. Therefore, they recognize the necessity of undertaking a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial on the (cost-)effectiveness of early surgical hematoma evacuation versus a conservative treatment in elderly with a traumatic ASDH. Objective: To compare the (cost-)effectiveness of early surgical hematoma evacuation versus a conservative treatment in elderly patients with a traumatic ASDH. Study design: A prospective, pragmatic, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT). Study population: Patients ≥ 65 years with at first presentation a GCS ≥ 9 and a traumatic ASDH >10 mm or a traumatic ASDH <10 mm and a midline shift >5 mm, or a GCS < 9 with a traumatic ASDH <10 mm and a midline shift <5 mm without extracranial explanations for the comatose state, for whom clinical equipoise exists regarding the preferred treatment. Intervention: Patients are randomized to either early surgical hematoma evacuation (A) or conservative management on the ICU or the ward (B). In case of neurological deterioration during conservative management, delayed surgery can be performed. The exact neurosurgical technique will be left to the discretion of the surgeons. Main study parameters/endpoints: Functional outcome after 1 year, expressed by the rating on the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Both treatment strategies are already used in current clinical practice as standard medical care. Therefore, there are no extra risks for patients participating in the study compared to patients outside the study. Study participation adds a minimal burden of three follow-up evaluations by visit in the first year (at 3, 6 and 12 months) and subsequent yearly evaluations by phone or postal until five years after the injury. Future elderly patients with a traumatic ASDH will benefit mostly from this study's results.
Cetuximab to reduce the amound of circulating tumor cells in early stage NSCLC