View clinical trials related to Suicide.
Filter by:A non invasive treatment study including participants at risk for suicide attempts and undergoing neurofeedback training. Neurofeedback is controlling your brain activity in real time inside the scanner.
Previous studies have found that the suicide risk of cancer patients is influenced by socioeconomic factors, clinical characteristics, and environmental factors. But prediction model with multiple predictors for suicide risk in cancer patients is limited. The aim of this study is to assess the association of socioeconomic factors, clinical characteristics and meteorological factors with cancer patients' suicide, based on retrospective cohorts, and to establish a suicide risk prediction model with multiple predictors for cancer patients.
The current study is a clinical trial, meaning a research study in which human subjects are prospectively assigned to one or more interventions to evaluate the effects of those interventions on health-related behavioral outcomes. Specifically, male and female adolescents with current suicidal intent will be randomly assigned to receive either a 1-hour session of virtual crisis response planning (CRP), a 1-hour session of in-person CRP, or a 1-hour session of standard crisis risk management (treatment as usual). The feasibility and acceptability of the virtual CRP, compared to in-person CRP, will be assessed 14 days post-treatment. Additional assessments of changes in mood, behavior, and suicidality will be collected daily for 14 days post-treatment via ecological momentary assessments. The investigators hypothesize the following: 1) Virtual CRP will be rated as more feasible and acceptable compared to traditional CRP and treatment as usual interventions; 2) Both versions of CRP will be associated with changes in frequency and severity of suicidal ideation and behavior compared to treatment as usual; 3) Virtual CRP will be equally as effective as traditional CRP at reducing suicide risk, suggesting that virtual CRP is a promising scalable intervention adaptation.
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a very common illness that is usually treated with antidepressant medication. Depression can be caused by many things such as childhood experiences, genetics, and changes in the way the body and brain function. It is most likely caused by a combination of several of these factors. The prevalence of suicide attempt in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is about 20%. Risk for suicide attempt can be increased by many things such as negative life events, genetics, and changes in the way the body and brain function. It is most likely caused by a combination of several of these factors. In this study, the investigators will be collecting detailed information about participants' psychiatric history and depression symptoms, as well as brain scans. The goal is to use this information to help us determine what predicts suicide attempt history.
The study will compare the effectiveness of two relatively brief and scalable evidence-based interventions: the Stanley Brown Safety Planning Intervention and Follow-up Contacts (SPI+), a suicide-specific intervention that helps people prevent suicidal crises from escalating, and Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Adolescents Ultra Short Crisis Intervention (IPT-A SCI), a psychotherapeutic crisis intervention treatment for suicidal adolescents that teaches youth skills to prevent suicidal crises and addresses interpersonal problems that lead to suicidal crises. The results will inform the future standard of care for youth at risk for suicide presenting in the ED setting. This project focuses on suicidal youth ages 12-19 in three ethnically and racially diverse urban areas: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Baltimore, Maryland; and upper Manhattan/lower Bronx in New York City.
The goal of this pilot randomized controlled trial is to test an adapted suicide prevention program (the Building VA Engagement, Self-efficacy, and Social Support To Prevent Suicide or BESST) in rural Veterans discharged from community care mental health treatment settings. The main question it aims to answer is: - Does BESST combined with standard care improve suicide-related outcomes among this population compared to standard care alone? Participants will be assigned by change to a treatment group. Some will receive the BESST intervention combined with standard care, and some will receive standard care alone. All participants will be in this research study for up to three months. Those receiving the BESST intervention will have: - 1 one-hour brief educational session; - Seven follow-up check-ins (~30 minutes each) All participants will have three assessment interviews where they will be asked about their mental health and treatment received outside of the VA. The investigators will compare participants assigned to the BESST intervention combined with standard care vs participants assigned to standard care alone to see if the BESST intervention improves suicide-related outcomes.
This is an inpatient four-arm randomized control trial comparing single drug clonazepam (S arm), a two-drug combination clonazepam/olanzapine (D arm), and a three-drug combination clonazepam/olanzapine/buprenorphine (T arm) with treatment as usual (TAU arm) in the treatment of emotional distress, specifically the Suicide Crisis Syndrome (SCS). All participants in experimental arms receive 2-day pulse treatments targeting four out of five of the acute emotional distress symptoms. The primary outcome measure is SCS at discharge and one-month follow-up. The secondary outcome measures include questions about suicidal behaviors associated with emotional distress at a one-month follow-up.
This study adds to the existing evidence on suicide prevention helpline efficacy because it tackles some of the common limitations for helpline studies. High risk individuals were not excluded from the study, since there was no human interference in deciding if the study was offered to the lifeline callers. Most of the existing studies exclude users in high risk and acute crisis situations. The study employed the callers' own ratings on a set of questions, automatically offered within the phone system immediately before and after the call to assess the immediate impact of the call and the intervention. The automatization of the self-report measures in the telephone system reduces the burden on the operators to offer the research questions without interrupting the crisis intervention and decreases the risk of bias in caller responses. The goal of this observational study is to evaluatie the Flesmish suicide prevention helpline in people who call the helpline when feeling suicidal. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Has the degree to which the caller feels in crisis subsided? (Crisis in this is seen as the subjective feeling of complete emotional upset) 2. Does the caller report feeling less suicidal? (Score on selected indicators of suicidality, particularly hopelessness, entrapment, controllability, suicidal intent and social support) 3. Is the caller satisfied with the conversation? 4. Which elements in the conversation (i.e., responders' interventions) make it more or less effective, in terms of crisis level, suicidality (indicators) and caller satisfaction? 5. Which elements of the conversation do callers name as (not) helpful during the follow-up conversation? Which elements promoted progress in this, besides merely lowering the crisis level? 6. What possible (follow-up) actions do callers see as helping to sustain and/or improve the longer-term impact of the conversation with the suicide prevention helpline? Participants are asked the fill in items before the call, immediately after the call and one to two weeks after the call.
Pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of two-way Caring Contacts text messages vs. one-way Caring Contacts text messages vs. enhanced usual care for suicide prevention in adults and adolescents.
The goal of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to develop and test a cognitive resilience intervention (CRI) among selected students who are having problems with anxiety, depression, and suicidal thoughts (psychological distress comorbid with suicidal episodes [PDSE]) and to see if it can help lower PDSE among the students who were enrolled. This study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of a CRI among students dealing with anxiety, depression, and suicidal thoughts (psychological distress comorbid with suicidal episodes [PDSE]) and determine if it is effective at reducing PDSE among the sampled students using psychological assessment tools. Participants will be exposed to CRI in the experimental group and psychoeducation in the control group. Researchers will compare the experimental group with the control group and infer the difference between these groups both at the pretest and posttest phases, as well as ascertain the feasibility and acceptability of this therapy among selected participants.