View clinical trials related to Stomach Neoplasms.
Filter by:This study is a prospective, single-center, observational study aimed at detecting the status of serum protein profiles at key time points in gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for advanced disease, and constructing a serum protein model for evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer. Subjects will receive neoadjuvant therapy (treatment regimen determined by the primary physician, limited to systemic therapy, with options including immune checkpoint inhibitor-based regimens and non-immune checkpoint inhibitor-based regimens). After four cycles of treatment, the efficacy will be assessed. Patients eligible for R0 resection will undergo D2 radical surgery regardless of tumor regression, while those ineligible for R0 resection will enter the palliative treatment phase (Note: Subjects are all patients who require neoadjuvant therapy even if they do not participate in this clinical study). Patients will receive regular follow-up evaluations for metastasis/recurrence and survival until tumor recurrence/progression or the last known date of patient survival (Note: Regular follow-up in this study follows the frequency of routine clinical follow-ups). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint is pathological response rate (based on Becker tumor regression grading, with residual tumor less than 50% considered effective preoperative treatment). Peripheral venous blood samples will be collected before the start of neoadjuvant therapy (blood sampling point 1 - baseline) and before surgery after neoadjuvant therapy (blood sampling point 2 - post-treatment). Approximately 3 ml of blood will be collected each time, and about 1.5 ml of serum will be obtained after processing. Serum protein profiling will be conducted to assess the expression of protein profiles at these treatment time points.
Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Although surgical treatment can benefit the survival of the vast majority of patients, currently only early gastric cancer patients can be cured directly through endoscopic resection or surgery alone. Neoadjuvant therapy reduces tumor volume and improves tumor response rate through preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, thereby increasing R0 resection rate and improving overall survival, without increasing postoperative complications and mortality. Timely imaging re staging during neoadjuvant therapy can allow patients to enter the surgical stage earlier, thereby reducing their preoperative burden. According to the different stages of neoadjuvant therapy, clinical staging can be divided into baseline stage (cBSstage) and clinical rest stage (cReStage) after neoadjuvant therapy. At present, the conventional imaging methods for diagnosing cBStage in gastric cancer include CT, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and MRI. The NCCN guidelines recommend CT for cBStage, with a diagnostic accuracy of 77.1% to 88.9%. Similarly, EUS and MRI were also used for cBStage, with accuracy rates of 65.0% to 92.1% and 71.4% to 82.6%, respectively. The application of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has improved the accuracy of MRI diagnosis of cBStage to 93%. However, due to the destruction of the gastric wall structure by neoadjuvant therapy, accurate imaging re staging is difficult. Currently, accurate tumor regression grading can only be obtained through surgical resection of pathological specimens. For cReT after neoadjuvant therapy, the diagnostic accuracy of EUS is only 63% (T2: 44%, T3: 68%, T4: 90%). Due to the presence of chronic inflammatory reactions, such as tumor cell apoptosis, necrosis, fibrosis, etc., in both the tumor and the critical normal gastric wall after neoadjuvant therapy, imaging cannot accurately identify the level of gastric wall, leading to the current low value of CT for cReT. Meanwhile, due to the fact that the pathological reactions of lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy are mainly subacute inflammatory reactions accompanied by scar tissue formation, and not all lymph node volumes that experience these pathological reactions will rapidly decrease, the accuracy of CT diagnosis of cReN is only 44%, while the sensitivity and specificity of EUS diagnosis of cReN are 50% and 56%, respectively. In addition, positron emission tomography (PET) can reflect the abnormal metabolism, protein synthesis, DNA repair, and cell proliferation of tumors at the molecular level, providing important information in tumor grading diagnosis, prognosis evaluation, treatment decision-making, and efficacy monitoring. The conventional positron tracer 18F-FDG can reflect the glucose metabolism ability of different tissues, while most types of malignant tumors exhibit high metabolism. Therefore, 18F-FDG can be used for the diagnosis, staging, and treatment monitoring of cancer. However, in gastric cancer patients, 18F-FDG has certain limitations, including 1) interference with physiological or inflammatory uptake of the gastric wall; 2) Low uptake of 18F-FDG is present in signet ring cell carcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, or other poorly differentiated cancers with high mucus content; 3) There are cases of false positive FDG after immunotherapy. In the study of SUV changes in the tumor area before and after treatment, it was found that patients with postoperative pathological regression grades 1-5 Δ SUVs are between 0-70%. Tumor associated fibroblasts are closely related to tumor growth, invasion, and distant metastasis, and their activation requires the involvement of fibroblast activation protein (FAP). Therefore, radiolabeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) can achieve in vivo FAP targeted tracing and quantification by specifically binding to FAP. Currently, a large number of studies have shown that 18F-FAPI is superior to 18F-FDG in the staging and re staging of gastric cancer. Furthermore, prospective studies have shown a certain relationship between tumor regression grade (TRG) and 18F-FAPI rate of change parameters (SUVmax, SUVavg, SUVR). Therefore, in the early stage of this study, 18F-FAPI combined with 18F-FDG PET/MRI imaging was used to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer, preoperative assessment of tumor regression grade after treatment, and re staging to guide the development of further clinical treatment plans.
Many studies have shown a significant change of diversity and composition in gut microbiota across the gastric carcinogenesis process, particularly in patients with gastric cancer. However, there has been no analysis of gastric microbiota using the mucosal brushing technique, despite its favoring benefit in microbiota study. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate microbiota profile in patients with gastric cancer, compared to those without gastric cancer by using mucosal brush sampling. This will improve current knowledge of the potential role of the microbiome in patient gastric cancer as a future biomarker marker using brushing sampling.
The purpose of this clinical trial is to prove that the prediction capability of 'WAYMED endo' is superior to that of the endoscopists in classifying EGC based on the depth of invasion categories in gastro-endoscopic images. The computer-aided detection·diagnosis software is an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software used to assist medical specialists in diagnostic decisions by automatically classifying EGC based on the depth of invasion categories in gastro-endoscopic images and displaying the results and possibilities on the User Interface (UI).
Endoscopic screening of gastric cancer combined with screening colonoscopy
After the initial diagnostic laparoscopy the Control group patients undergo 6 courses of polychemotherapy according to the FLOT scheme; the examination is carried out every 3 courses (after the 3rd and the 6th courses) with the control diagnostic laparoscopy after 6 courses of polychemotherapy. In the event of the complete regression of foci along the peritoneum and receiving Cy- in the peritoneal lavage, the dynamic observation or cytoreductive surgery is considered (optionally); in case of the incomplete response the dynamic observation is carried out until progression; in case of progression the 2nd line of chemotherapy or the optimal palliative care options depending on the clinical situation is considered. After the initial diagnostic laparoscopy the Study group patients undergo courses of polychemotherapy according to the scheme FLOT (the 1st, the 3rd, the 5th courses) and mFLOT (the 2nd , the 4th, the 6th courses) in the amount of 6 (six, 3+3); the examination is carried out every 3 courses (after the 3rd and the 6th courses) with dPIPAC sessions using docetaxel (thus excluding it from the system administration) in the 2nd , the 4th, the 6th courses of polychemotherapy. Control diagnostic laparoscopy is not performed in the group No 2, its function is performed by the revision at the PIPAC session of the 6th course of polychemotherapy, which corresponds to the time interval of the Control group. In the event of the complete regression of foci along the peritoneum and receiving Cy- in the peritoneal lavage, the dynamic observation or cytoreductive surgery is considered (optionally); in case of the incomplete response the dynamic observation is carried out until progression; in case of progression the 2nd line of chemotherapy or the optimal palliative care options depending on the clinical situation is considered.
The purpose of this study is to find out whether treatment with metronomic capecitabine will improve the survival of gastric cancer patients with stage III who had received standard treatment.
For locally advanced esophagogastric junction and gastric cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can downstage T and N stage,treated distant micrometastases early , and finally improve the long-term survival. Combination of perioperative PD-1 antibody and chemotherapy for locally advanced esophagogastric junction and gastric cancer could be a novel therapy to increase response rate and reduce recurrence rate.Cadonilimab, a tetravalent bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4, is designed to retain the efficacy benefit of combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 and improve on the safety profile of the combination therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cadonilimab Plus Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophagogastric Junction and Gastric Cancer.
Aneuploidy may be used as a more sensitive diagnostic tool to detect peritoneal metastasis compared to conventional cytology and imaging techniques. Our aim is to establish whether aneuploidy as detected in cfDNA (as a measure for ctDNA) in PLF of patients with GC may hold value as an additional staging and tumor evaluation method in GC patients.
To evaluate the feasibility, applicability, effectiveness, and health-economic value of the risk-based sequential screening modality for esophageal and gastric cancers, the investigators aim to initiate a community-based randomized controlled trial in Xun County, Henan Province, which is a high-risk region of upper gastrointestinal cancer (UGIC) in northern China. A total of 258 target villages from all the 11 communities (townships and streets) in Xun County will be randomly selected and assigned to the sequential screening group and the universal screening group at a ratio of 2:1 and the total sample size will be 21,000. In the sequential screening group, participants in the top 50% risk level (i.e., stratified as the high-risk subgroup) will be offered a standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopic screening. In contrast, all participants in the universal screening group will receive the endoscopic examination. The surveillance strategy for participants with screening-detected premalignant lesions in the sequential screening group will be tailored based on individualized risk assessment using endoscopic characteristics, pathological diagnosis, and biomarkers. Surveillance for participants in the universal screening group will adhere to current guidelines for UGIC screening and clinical treatment. Detection rates of upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions, early-stage malignant lesions and premalignant lesions, and health-economic indicators such as the unit cost per detected malignant lesions will be compared between the two groups.