View clinical trials related to Stomach Cancer.
Filter by:This is an observational case-control study to train and validate a genome-wide methylome enrichment platform to detect multiple cancer types and to differentiate amongst cancer types. The cancers included in this study are brain, breast, bladder, cervical, colorectal, endometrial, esophageal, gastric, head and neck, hepatobiliary, leukemia, lung, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, renal, sarcoma, and thyroid. These cancers were selected based on their prevalence and mortality to maximize impact on clinical care. Additionally, the ability of the whole-genome methylome enrichment platform to detect minimal residual disease after completion of cancer treatment and to detect relapse prior to clinical presentation will be evaluated in four cancer types (breast, colorectal, lung, prostate). These cancers were selected based on the existing clinical landscape and treatment availability.
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of the type of omentectomy (partial or total) in the treatment of Tis - T3 gastric cancer without serosal infiltration. The second purpose is to monitoring the blood levels of immunological factors (interleukins, T cell subtypes, etc.) pre-and postoperatively, depending on the type of omentectomy.
This is a phase I trial of CA-4948 in combination with FOLFOX/PD-1 inhibitor with or without trastuzumab for unresectable gastric, GEJ, and esophageal cancer. During the Dose Escalation portion of the study, different dose levels of CA-4948 in combination with FOLFOX/nivolumab will be evaluated by BOIN algorithm. Dose Expansion will include Cohorts A and B. Expansion Cohort A will enroll up to 12 patients with HER2 negative gastric, GEJ, and esophageal cancer at the expansion dose of CA-4948 determined during Dose Escalation and will use the same treatment regimen of FOLFOX/nivolumab. Expansion Cohort B will investigate CA-4948 at the dose determined during Dose Escalation in combination with FOLFOX/pembrolizumab and trastuzumab in up to 12 patients with HER2 positive disease; however, the initial 6 patients will be considered safety lead-in to confirm the safety and tolerability of this combination; if determined to be safe, an additional 6 patients will be enrolled for a total of 12 in Cohort B.
Patients with digestive tract malignancy often experience severe and unremitting abdominal pain that negatively affects physical, emotional, and social function, as well as health related quality of life (HRQOL). Therapeutic virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising and evidence-based treatment modality for cancer pain. Users of VR wear a pair of goggles with a close-proximity screen in front of the eyes that creates a sensation of being transported into lifelike, three-dimensional worlds. To date, VR has been limited to short-term clinical trials for cancer pain. Moreover, limited research exists on theory-based VR modalities beyond mere distraction, such as VR that employs acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) with components of biofeedback and mindfulness. To bridge these gaps, this study seeks to: (1) assess the impact of immersive VR on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including pain, activity metrics, and opioid use among patients with visceral pain from a digestive tract malignancy; (2) assess differences in PROs, activity metrics, and opioid use between skills-based VR therapy vs. distraction VR therapy; and (3) determine patient-level predictors of VR treatment response in visceral cancer pain. To address these aims, the study will measure PROs and opioid use in 360 patients randomized among 3 groups and follow them for 60 days after enrollment: (1) an enhanced VR group receiving skills-based VR; (2) a distraction-based VR group receiving patient-selected VR videos; and (3) a VR sham control group using a VR headset with 2-D content. The results will inform best practices for the implementation of VR for visceral cancer pain management and guide selection of patient-tailored experiences.
This multi-center, randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ESD for undifferentiated type of EGC meeting the expanded indication compared with surgery.
The primary objective of this study, DELFI-L101, is to train and test classifiers for lung cancer detection using the DELFI assay and other biomarker and clinical features.
Perioperative chemotherapy improves overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) compared with surgery alone in patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJA). The addition of tislelizumab and trastuzumab to chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (GC), and the investigators aimed to explore its role in the perioperative setting.
The purpose of this study is to explore the effect of immunological heterogeneity of tumor microenvironment in the short-term outcome and long-term outcome of patients with gastric cancer.
Alpelisib (BYL719) is a PIK3CA-specific inhibitor, which was developed by Novartis (Basel, Switzerland). Our group conducted pre-clinical study of alpelisib in eight gastric cancer cell lines: four PIK3CA wild-type (SNU638, SNU668, SNU1, and SNU16) and four PIK3CA mutant (SNU719, AGS, SNU601, and MKN). As a result, alpelisib preferentially inhibited the growth of gastric cancer cells with PIK3CA mutations. In addition, alpelisib inhibited cell growth via G1 arrest and subsequently induces apoptosis in GC cells, and this effect is more remarkable in cells harboring PIK3CA mutations. Moreover, alpelisib in combination with paclitaxel showed synergistic cytotoxic effects and significantly increased apoptosis compared with alpelisib or paclitaxel monotherapy in GC cells. The purpose of the study is to define the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of paclitaxel and alpelisib combination therapy in patients with advanced tumors and to evaluate the efficacy of paclitaxel and AZD8186 combination therapy as a second-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer with PTEN aberrations. This study is divided into Phase IB and Phase II.
This is a randomized, double-blinded, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HX008 injection combined with irinotecan versus placebo combined with irinotecan as second-line therapy in patients with adcanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma who have had tumor progression after first-line treatment with platinum and/or fluropyrimidine therapy.