View clinical trials related to Stable Angina.
Filter by:Purpose: This study is to determine the effect of T89(Dantonic®)on P450 enzymes. This study will help determine which types of drugs may interact with T89.
This study of 403 cases of stable angina patients who were diagnosed as Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) is a randomized, blank controlled, multi-center clinical study. Patients who are taking standard treatment with stable symptoms will receive a 24-hour ambulatory ECG (Holter) examination and whose results are positive will go into the treatment period. They will be randomly divided into two groups. The nicorandil group will receive nicorandil 5mg (3 times a day = tid) on top of the standard treatment for 3 months, while the control group will stay on standard treatment. Nitrates and beta blockers need to be maintained on a stable dose. Other drugs that do not affect the primary endpoint may be adjusted per investigators decision.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate non-inferiority in terms of safety and efficacy of DES Limus Carbostent compared to the Taxus Liberté in treating de-novo atherosclerotic lesions in native coronary arteries.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if high-dose (80mg/day) atorvastatin might exert an adjunctive anti-platelet effect compared to high-dose clopidogrel (150mg/day) in stable patients with high on-treatment reactivity according to a point-of-care platelet function assay.
Impaired renal function is associated with reduced responsiveness to clopidogrel. There are no studies which have shown a means by which to overcome platelet hyporesponsiveness in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The purpose of this study was to determine the functional impact of cilostazol in patients with CKD undergoing hemodialysis.
This is a multicenter survey of Russian data on target heart rate achievement in patients with stable angina and arterial hypertension who are currently treated with beta-blockers for at least 2 months and with no dose change for a minimum of 4 weeks
Pressure intermittent coronary sinus occlusion (PICSO) in patients with coronary artery disease improves collateral flow index to higher than 30%. PICSO used in this patient population is safe, feasible and effective. Safety, feasibility and effectiveness will be tested by periprocedural and logistic data.
The investigators hypothesize that the nanoburning is a very challenging technique to demolish and reverse the plaque especially in combination with stem cell technologies promising the functional restoration of the vessel wall. The completed (in July 2012) interventional three arms (n=180) first-in-man trial (the NANOM-FIM trial) assessed (NCT01270139) the safety and feasibility of two delivery techniques for nanoparticles (NP), and plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPTT) of atherosclerotic lesions. Patients were assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either (1) nano-intervention with delivery of silica-gold NP in mini-surgery implanted bioengineered on-artery patch (n=60), or (2) nano-intervention with delivery of silica-gold iron-bearing NP with targeted micro-bubbles or stem cells in hands of magnetic navigation system (n=60) versus (3) stent implantation (n=60). The primary outcome was TAV at 12 months. The observational prospective cohort analysis (an amendment to the protocol of August 29th 2012 with a decision to extend a 1-year study for another 4 years with the assessment of the 5-year clinical outcomes both retro- and prospectively) of the long-term clinical outcomes at the intention-to-treat population of 180 patients with CAD and angiographic SYNTAX score ≤22 enrolled initially to NANOM-FIM trial will be performed at 5 years after the intervention. The primary outcome will be a MACE-free survival. The secondary outcomes will be MACE, cardiac death, TLR (target lesion revascularization) and TVR (target vessel revascularization). Imaging endpoints will be assessed pre-, post- procedure and at 12-month follow-up. Clinical endpoints will be analyzed at the baseline and at 12 and 60-month follow-up (the release of results is expected after October 2016). Parameters of nanotoxicity will be assessed. The independent adjudication analysis of the clinical outcomes is scheduled in 2017-2019. The subset post-hoc analysis will be conducted at 1- and 5-year follow-up (by the Amendment of August 29th 2012). At the first subset, patients underwent stenting with XIENCE V stent proximal to the site of nano-intervention (n=13). Subjects in the second subset were undergone drug-coated balloon pre-dilation with further nano-technique (n=20). Lesions in patients of the third subset were not prepared for the nano-approach (n=147) (neither stenting nor balloon angioplasty). The analysis will be performed and results will be released after 2018 with the same clinical outcomes. This project and related manuscripts were not prepared or funded in any part by a commercial organization. Nanoparticles and biomedical equipment were supplied free for the study by the non-profit Agiko and De Haar Research Task Force (Rotterdam-Amsterdam, the Netherlands). All rights of the authors are reserved. The access of the international academic or governmental organizations to the essential and primary data of the trial is restricted by the Russian governmental authorities due to the interest of the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB).
The purpose of this study is to determine if MR Perfusion Imaging is non-inferior to coronary angiography with measurement of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in guiding management of patients with stable chest pain. - All patients will undergo an MR Perfusion Imaging test. - Further management will be guided by the result of the cardiac MRI in half of the patients (chosen by random). - The other half will undergo coronary angiography with measurement of FFR. The result of this test alone will guide their further management. The result of the initial MR Perfusion test will not be available to the treating doctors of this group. - All patients will receive optimal medical therapy (OMT) - All patients will undergo follow-up to find out if they have any relevant heart related events.
The objective of this study is to evaluate if aggressive antiplatelet therapy would reduce ischemic events in aspirin (ASA) resistant patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).