View clinical trials related to Spinal Puncture.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of CMPAT and MAT in patients undergoing LP. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the CMPAT treatment group (group A) or the MAT treatment group (group B). Researchers will compare CMPAT treatment group and the MAT treatment group to see if the number of needle insertion attempts required for a successful LP, the puncture success rate, pain assessment in the back, head, and legs, and the occurrence of complications have different.
Visibly traumatic as well as microtraumatic lumbar punctures (LP) are very common in the neonatal period. The presence of blood makes it difficult to interpret cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) findings. Clinicians often perform a repeat LP in the hope that some of the red blood cells would have cleared by then, allowing a better interpretation of the CSF findings. There is no published information whether a repeat LP provides any added information to the original traumatic LP, and if so what is the best time to repeat an LP after a traumatic LP. In this randomised controlled trial (RCT), we plan to randomly allocate neonates following a visibly traumatic LP to either undergo a repeat LP at 24 hours or 48 hours later to determine which LP gives more accurate results.
Although the lumbar puncture is a common procedure and has been performed without ultrasound for decades, other research studies suggest that there may be some benefits to using ultrasound. This study intends to see whether by using ultrasound there is increased success rate, decreased need for additional procedures, and less discomfort during the procedure.
The main purpose of the study is to assess the feasibility and clinical performance of impedance based tissue identification in various spine structures.
The study is carried out in a prospectively randomly controlled way. In the context of acknowledgement and understanding from parents, by comparing with traditional process(no anesthesia), lidocaine surface anesthesia is randomly selected. All children will be evaluated by the FLACC (The face, legs, activity, cry, consolability behavioral tool) scale to quantitatively assess degree of pain during lumbar puncture. Time and success rate of the lumber puncture will be recorded and analyzed. A questionnaire about bad memory during lumbar puncture for all parents and children will be investigated in order to establish an optimized lumbar puncture management process.
Background and Objectives: Spinal puncture is painful procedure which may cause patient refusal of spinal anesthesia in future surgery. It could be minimized with topical and infiltration local anesthetic or intravenous opioid application before procedure. Objective was efficacy of intravenous fentanyl in alleviating pain during spinal needle insertion. Methods: Prospective, randomized study included 88 adults (33-55 ages, ASA I/II), scheduled for lower leg surgery. Patients were divided in four equal study groups: spinal needle (Quincke, 26G) with introducer (20G) was inserted alone, three minutes after local anesthetic infiltration (2 ml of 2% lidocaine, 25Gx11/4" needle) or intravenous fentanyl application (0.001 mg kg-1) and without local anesthetic, fentanyl and introducer. Pain was assessed immediately after procedure by VAS score. MAP, HR and SaO2 were recorded. Sedation was assessed by Ramsay score. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 11.0.
We have developed a positioning cushion for LP which allows the child to be relaxed in an adequate position, and to maintain this position throughout LP. This study was aimed at evaluating the benefit of the device on the technical quality of LPs, on pain, anxiety, post LP syndrome, and on the satisfaction of children, their parents and caregivers. The study was a two-centre, open, randomized trial, with two parallel groups. Children aged 2 to 18 years undergoing a LP were eligible, if not included in the study before. Those who had used the cushion before, with a medical reason preventing the use of the cushion, those refusing or whose parents refused could not be included. Randomization was stratified by centre. Four cushion sizes were available for the age ranges: 2-6 years, 6-10 years, 10-15 and 15-18 years. The primary outcome was the rate of success, defined as a LP reaching its objective at the first attempt, without hemorrhage (visible hemorrhage or RBC > 50/mm3 in the CSF sample). Secondary outcomes included: the child's pain using a visual analogic scale (VAS), parents and caregiver perception of the child's pain (VAS); the children, parents, caregiver and physician performing the LP satisfaction; children cooperation using the "Le Baron Scale", and the occurrence of a post LP syndrome.
The objective of this study is to compare intraoperative and recovery parameters in patients who receive two different dose combinations of propofol and remifentanil in patients undergoing a lumbar puncture.