View clinical trials related to Spinal Puncture.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of CMPAT and MAT in patients undergoing LP. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the CMPAT treatment group (group A) or the MAT treatment group (group B). Researchers will compare CMPAT treatment group and the MAT treatment group to see if the number of needle insertion attempts required for a successful LP, the puncture success rate, pain assessment in the back, head, and legs, and the occurrence of complications have different.
The study is carried out in a prospectively randomly controlled way. In the context of acknowledgement and understanding from parents, by comparing with traditional process(no anesthesia), lidocaine surface anesthesia is randomly selected. All children will be evaluated by the FLACC (The face, legs, activity, cry, consolability behavioral tool) scale to quantitatively assess degree of pain during lumbar puncture. Time and success rate of the lumber puncture will be recorded and analyzed. A questionnaire about bad memory during lumbar puncture for all parents and children will be investigated in order to establish an optimized lumbar puncture management process.