Clinical Trials Logo

Shock clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Shock.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT05761522 Recruiting - Septic Shock Clinical Trials

Cardiovascular Effects of Norepinephrine

Start date: April 21, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Previous studies of our team reported the improvement of myocardial contractility both on hemodynamic parameters (by transpulmonary thermodilution) and morphological (by transthoracic echocardiography: TTE), during the early phase of septic shock (during the first 4 hours management of septic shock). However, one can wonder about the effect of NAD on myocardial cardiac ouput and contractility beyond the early phase of septic shock, more precisely beyond the first 24 hours. Indeed, while it continues to act on the "stressed" blood volume and the diastolic left ventricular perfusion by increasing the diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), it has been reported in old studies that beyond the early phase, the sensitivity of the β1-adrenergic receptors is altered due to the phenomenon of internalization of these receptors, leading to a reduction of the myocardial response to catecholamines. The investigators can then wonder whether norepinephrine still exerts a positive effect on myocardial contractility via the increase in DAP, despite an alteration of the β1-adrenergic pathway. To answer this question, the investigators proposed to evaluate the effects of norepinephrine by TTE on cardiac contractility after the initial phase.

NCT ID: NCT05759767 Active, not recruiting - Pediatric Disorder Clinical Trials

The Efficacy and Safety of Medical Expulsive Therapy After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in Pediatric Urolithiasis

Start date: February 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of MET after ESWL in pediatric urolithiasis.

NCT ID: NCT05752383 Recruiting - Cardiogenic Shock Clinical Trials

The Clinical and Hemodynamic Course of Cardiogenic Shocks Hospitalized in Critical Care

HEMOCARD
Start date: January 24, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Cardiogenic shock is a frequent reason for hospitalization in critical care units, with high mortality (50%). Several French registries have been created to improve knowledge of the prognostic factors of cardiogenic shock. In recent years, temporary mechanical circulatory support has become more important in cardiogenic shock. The monitoring of catecholamines is also performed with a global score: the vaso-inotropic score. The purpose of our study is to consider using these new data and techniques to create a cohort of cardiogenic shock within our critical care unit. This observational study is based on clinical, biological, and hemodynamic data recorded during the ICU stay of patients for cardiogenic shock. The primary endpoint is the relationship between the hemodynamic evolution of cardiogenic shock and in-hospital mortality.

NCT ID: NCT05748860 Not yet recruiting - Cardiogenic Shock Clinical Trials

PRecision Ecmo in CardIogenic Shock Evaluation

PRECISE
Start date: April 3, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Venoarterial (VA) ECMO is a form of life support for patients with severe cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest. Although it can be lifesaving, currently many patients still die or have long term disability, such as weakness, shortness of breath and cognitive impairments, and it remains extremely expensive. It is important that new ways of identifying which patients will gain the most benefit from ECMO are found, while also avoiding costly futile use when it there is no benefit. The PRECISE Study is an Australian-led, nation-wide observational study that will investigate whether biomarkers can better guide decisions around to whom and how ECMO is delivered. The study will involve the collection of a small amount of blood (which would normally be discarded) at up to 4 different time points, including just prior to ECMO initiation, and also at days 1, 3, and 7 of ECMO support. These results will then be linked to a national registry which includes the important patient centred outcomes, such as disability at 6 months. This study will lead to the better support of a highly vulnerable population, and improve the efficiency of one of the most complex and costly interventions available.

NCT ID: NCT05741762 Active, not recruiting - Critical Illness Clinical Trials

Assessing Baseline Cortisol Levels in Patients Admitted With Septic Shock in Intensive Care Unit

Start date: January 31, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI), a term coined since 2008 by Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and is characterized by inflammation resulting from inadequate intracellular glucocorticoid-mediated anti-inflammatory activity leading to increased morbidity and mortality in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients.1 Severe Sepsis with shock is a common reason for admission to ICU/hospital and may require ionotropic support.2 The current guidelines from SCCM in 2017 suggest using either random cortisol of < 10 ug/dL (<276 nmol/L) or change in cortisol at 60 min after cosyntropin (250 µg) administration from baseline cortisol of <9 µg/dl (<248 nmol/L) to assess of presence of CRCI and recommend use of hydrocortisone in these patients.3 There have been studies done to look at baseline cortisol in patient with severe pneumonia requiring ICU and they have found cortisol level of < 15 ug/dl (<414 nmol/L) can predict CIRCI.4 However, there is no study on assessment of baseline random cortisol levels in patients with septic shock in our local population. The current guidance from Surviving Sepsis campaign suggests a more clinical approach of adding IV corticosteroids only if there is ongoing requirement for vasopressors, which is a new change in contrast to 2016 guidelines.5 This study aims to look the available mean baseline cortisol in these patients to create a reference data for local population.

NCT ID: NCT05738265 Active, not recruiting - Shock Clinical Trials

Fluid Resuscitation In Trauma: What Are The Best Strategies And Fluids?

Start date: August 1, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Illustration of the differential effects of commonly used resuscitation fluids, including isotonic crystalloids, natural and artificial colloids, hypertonic and hyperoncotic solutions to prevent the cellular injury through wiser resuscitation in traumatic patient . The ideal resuscitation strategy for multiply injured patients.

NCT ID: NCT05728359 Recruiting - Cardiogenic Shock Clinical Trials

Genomic Determinants of Outcome in Cardiogenic Shock

Goldilocs
Start date: September 20, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

The aim of this project is to understand the heterogeneity of both the immune consequences and treatment responses in CS. We will explore this heterogeneity through identification of transcriptomic sub-phenotypes and their association with outcomes, including therapeutic responses.

NCT ID: NCT05726825 Not yet recruiting - Septic Shock Clinical Trials

Efficacy of add-on Plasma Exchange as an Adjunctive Strategy Against Septic Shock

EXCHANGE-2
Start date: November 28, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Randomized, prospective, multicenter, open-label, controlled, parallel-group interventional trial to test the adjunctive effect of therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with early septic shock.

NCT ID: NCT05719935 Recruiting - Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials

The KinematX Midcarpal Total Wrist Arthroplasty Registry

Start date: April 26, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

The goal of this observational study is to learn about functional and patient reported outcomes in patient undergoing total wrist replacement with the KinematX total wrist replacement study. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What is the range of motion (flexion, extension, radial, ulnar, grip and pinch strength) at 3-, 6-, and 12-months after surgery and yearly up to 10 years among patients having total wrist replacement with the KinematX implant. - What are the patient reported outcomes (PROMIS, PRWE, HSS wrist expectations) at 3-, 6-, and 12-months after surgery and yearly up to 10 years among patients having total wrist replacement with the KinematX implant. - How do range of motion and patient reported outcomes change over the 10 years after total wrist replacement surgery? Participants will be followed according to standard of care and preoperative and post-operative information for up to 10 years after surgery will be collected and entered into an electronic data base. Patients are eligible to enroll into the registry before or after they have had their wrist replacement surgery.

NCT ID: NCT05702606 Completed - Cerebral Palsy Clinical Trials

Shock Wave Therapy for Management of Spasticity in Patients With Cerebral Palsy

Start date: June 10, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Spasticity is the most common motor disorder in cerebral palsy (CP). The objectives of his therapeutic approach include; reducing pain, ease of use of orthopedic aids, improving posture, minimizing contractures and deformity, and facilitating mobility and dexterity, with the ultimate goal of maximizing the potential of the patient and promoting their independence and quality of life. The approach to spasticity in CP is complex and presents itself as a great challenge for the rehabilitation team. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) has been established in recent years as an effective, non-invasive alternative with hardly any side effects (small bruises or discomfort during the application) for the management of spasticity in patients with CP. rESWT is a relatively new therapy in the field of neurology, in 2010 was published the first clinical trial where shock waves were applied for the management of spasticity in patients with CP. Currently, few works have studied the efficacy of rESWT in patients with CP. In all of them, the results demonstrated the treatment's effectiveness in reducing spasticity locally in people with CP up to 3 months after the application. The group most studied muscle has been the Triceps Surae, and there is a great disparity regarding the doses of treatment applied in each study, especially regarding the number of sessions and the time interval between sessions. The most widely used protocol is 3 rESWT sessions with a time interval of 1 week between session; This protocol was established as the most effective in the treatment of trauma pathology. Despite all the variability in the administration of the dose, we have been able to observe that none of them has studied the effect of rESWT by lengthening the time interval between sessions beyond one week to check whether the therapeutic effects on spasticity can be prolonged over time by applying the same dose. Most of the studies conclude that future research should be aimed at studying the most optimal dose of treatment as well as evaluating the long-term results.