Sedation Complication Clinical Trial
Official title:
Optimization of Sedation Protocol for Endoscopic Procedures Using Impedance Ventilation Monitor.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of opioids administered during sedation on patients' respiratory activity (ventilation) and comfort of the operator and patient during the endoscopic procedure. A common side effect of sedation is the effect on patients' ventilation, resulting from a combination of attenuation of respiratory centre activity and loss of patent airways. Shallow sedation will reduce these risks, but in addition to patient discomfort, it also increases the difficulty or impossibility of the endoscopist to perform the procedure. Choosing the appropriate method of sedation thus fundamentally affects the course of the procedure from the point of view of both the patient and the endoscopist. The aim is to prove that sedation with propofol alone compared to sedation with propofol and fentanyl premedication leads to the need for higher cumulative doses of administered propofol, higher risk of respiratory depression and lower patient and operator comfort. In addition, the non-invasive respiratory volume monitor (ExSpiron 2Xi) will be used for standard patient monitoring during the procedure, which assesses the lung tidal volume and respiratory rate by measuring the electrical impedance of the chest. This measurement captures inadequate ventilation before saturation drops, allowing even slight differences between selected drugs to be compared.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of opioids administered during sedation on patients' respiratory activity (ventilation) and comfort of the operator and patient during the endoscopic procedure. A common side effect of sedation is the effect on patients' ventilation, resulting from a combination of attenuation of respiratory centre activity and loss of patent airways. Shallow sedation will reduce these risks, but in addition to patient discomfort, it also increases the difficulty or impossibility of the endoscopist to perform the procedure. Choosing the appropriate method of sedation thus fundamentally affects the course of the procedure from the point of view of both the patient and the endoscopist. The aim is to prove that sedation with propofol alone compared to sedation with propofol and fentanyl premedication leads to the need for higher cumulative doses of administered propofol, higher risk of respiratory depression and lower patient and operator comfort. Standard monitoring during endoscopic procedures using sedation includes continual recording of ECG and respiratory rate (using the same electrodes), measurement of arterial blood oxygen saturation using a pulse oximeter and blood pressure measurement. Extended monitoring of spontaneous ventilation during sedation includes analysis of the concentration of exhaled carbon dioxide or analysis of the arterial blood gases.However, these methods have limitations and often critically reduced respiratory activity is diagnosed too late. Impedance monitoring of ventilation is now being introduced into clinical practice. In addition, the non-invasive respiratory volume monitor (ExSpiron 2Xi) will be used for standard patient monitoring during the procedure, which assesses the lung tidal volume and respiratory rate by measuring the electrical impedance of the chest. This measurement captures inadequate ventilation before saturation drops, allowing even slight differences between selected drugs to be compared. ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT06033729 -
Remifentanil Target Controlled Infusion Versus Standard of Care for Conscious Sedation During EBUS-TBNA
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04760249 -
A Dedicated Sedation Team for Paediatric Procedural Sedation
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05505279 -
Ventilatory Effects of THRIVE During EBUS
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05267704 -
Evaluating the Feasibility of VR for Pediatric Renal Biopsies
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06337877 -
Assessment of Sedation Depth in ARDS Patients Undergoing Therapeutic Paralysis
|
||
Completed |
NCT06174168 -
The Decisiveness of MFI-11 in Predicting Complications in Patients > 65 Years Who Underwent EBUS-TBNA Under Sedation
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05969483 -
Validation of a Processed EEG Device for Monitoring Sedation in PICU
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05958537 -
High Flow Nasal Oxygen Cannula in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Complications and Biomarkers
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06014138 -
Volatile Sedation for Patients With the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04801589 -
Goal-Directed Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Infants and Children
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05748626 -
Anti-Snoring Appliances and Airway Manipulation in Patients Undergoing Anesthetic Sedation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04727034 -
Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Tosylate for Sedation in Gastroscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06434428 -
Comparison Between Intranasal vs Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for EEG Sedation of Children With Behavior Disorders.
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05407870 -
Efficacy and Safety of Etomidate Sedation in Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06459167 -
Position Intervention to Reduce Hypoxemia in Sedation Patients
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05423821 -
Non-operating Room Anesthesia Experiences in Pediatric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cases
|
||
Suspended |
NCT05399758 -
Nociception Evaluated by the NOL® Index in Sedated Patients in the Intensive Care Unit
|
||
Completed |
NCT04410211 -
Comparison Between Two Types of Sedation for Elective Upper Endoscopy Procedures
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04455776 -
Safety Evaluation of Propofol Sedation for Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pediatric Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT05451121 -
Effect of Sedation Strategy on Duration Mechanical Ventilation in Patient After Cardiac Surgery
|
N/A |