Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of opioids administered during sedation on patients' respiratory activity (ventilation) and comfort of the operator and patient during the endoscopic procedure. A common side effect of sedation is the effect on patients' ventilation, resulting from a combination of attenuation of respiratory centre activity and loss of patent airways. Shallow sedation will reduce these risks, but in addition to patient discomfort, it also increases the difficulty or impossibility of the endoscopist to perform the procedure. Choosing the appropriate method of sedation thus fundamentally affects the course of the procedure from the point of view of both the patient and the endoscopist. The aim is to prove that sedation with propofol alone compared to sedation with propofol and fentanyl premedication leads to the need for higher cumulative doses of administered propofol, higher risk of respiratory depression and lower patient and operator comfort. In addition, the non-invasive respiratory volume monitor (ExSpiron 2Xi) will be used for standard patient monitoring during the procedure, which assesses the lung tidal volume and respiratory rate by measuring the electrical impedance of the chest. This measurement captures inadequate ventilation before saturation drops, allowing even slight differences between selected drugs to be compared.


Clinical Trial Description

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of opioids administered during sedation on patients' respiratory activity (ventilation) and comfort of the operator and patient during the endoscopic procedure. A common side effect of sedation is the effect on patients' ventilation, resulting from a combination of attenuation of respiratory centre activity and loss of patent airways. Shallow sedation will reduce these risks, but in addition to patient discomfort, it also increases the difficulty or impossibility of the endoscopist to perform the procedure. Choosing the appropriate method of sedation thus fundamentally affects the course of the procedure from the point of view of both the patient and the endoscopist. The aim is to prove that sedation with propofol alone compared to sedation with propofol and fentanyl premedication leads to the need for higher cumulative doses of administered propofol, higher risk of respiratory depression and lower patient and operator comfort. Standard monitoring during endoscopic procedures using sedation includes continual recording of ECG and respiratory rate (using the same electrodes), measurement of arterial blood oxygen saturation using a pulse oximeter and blood pressure measurement. Extended monitoring of spontaneous ventilation during sedation includes analysis of the concentration of exhaled carbon dioxide or analysis of the arterial blood gases.However, these methods have limitations and often critically reduced respiratory activity is diagnosed too late. Impedance monitoring of ventilation is now being introduced into clinical practice. In addition, the non-invasive respiratory volume monitor (ExSpiron 2Xi) will be used for standard patient monitoring during the procedure, which assesses the lung tidal volume and respiratory rate by measuring the electrical impedance of the chest. This measurement captures inadequate ventilation before saturation drops, allowing even slight differences between selected drugs to be compared. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT06060626
Study type Interventional
Source Charles University, Czech Republic
Contact Ilona Trtíková, Mgr., Ph.D.
Phone +420224965613
Email ilona.trtikova@clf1.cz
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date November 16, 2023
Completion date December 31, 2024

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT06033729 - Remifentanil Target Controlled Infusion Versus Standard of Care for Conscious Sedation During EBUS-TBNA N/A
Completed NCT04760249 - A Dedicated Sedation Team for Paediatric Procedural Sedation
Recruiting NCT05505279 - Ventilatory Effects of THRIVE During EBUS Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05267704 - Evaluating the Feasibility of VR for Pediatric Renal Biopsies N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06337877 - Assessment of Sedation Depth in ARDS Patients Undergoing Therapeutic Paralysis
Completed NCT06174168 - The Decisiveness of MFI-11 in Predicting Complications in Patients > 65 Years Who Underwent EBUS-TBNA Under Sedation
Recruiting NCT05969483 - Validation of a Processed EEG Device for Monitoring Sedation in PICU
Recruiting NCT06014138 - Volatile Sedation for Patients With the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05958537 - High Flow Nasal Oxygen Cannula in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Complications and Biomarkers N/A
Recruiting NCT04801589 - Goal-Directed Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Infants and Children Phase 3
Completed NCT05748626 - Anti-Snoring Appliances and Airway Manipulation in Patients Undergoing Anesthetic Sedation N/A
Recruiting NCT04727034 - Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Tosylate for Sedation in Gastroscopy N/A
Recruiting NCT05407870 - Efficacy and Safety of Etomidate Sedation in Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05423821 - Non-operating Room Anesthesia Experiences in Pediatric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cases
Suspended NCT05399758 - Nociception Evaluated by the NOL® Index in Sedated Patients in the Intensive Care Unit
Completed NCT04410211 - Comparison Between Two Types of Sedation for Elective Upper Endoscopy Procedures N/A
Completed NCT04455776 - Safety Evaluation of Propofol Sedation for Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pediatric Patients
Completed NCT05451121 - Effect of Sedation Strategy on Duration Mechanical Ventilation in Patient After Cardiac Surgery N/A
Completed NCT05996588 - Comparison Between Sevoflurane and Propofol for Maintenance of Sedation During ERCP Phase 4
Completed NCT04699916 - EEG-based Sedation Protocol for Patients on Mechanical Ventilation Due to SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia N/A