Clinical Trials Logo

Sedation Complication clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Sedation Complication.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04410211 Completed - Clinical trials for Sedation Complication

Comparison Between Two Types of Sedation for Elective Upper Endoscopy Procedures

Start date: June 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Sedation is defined as the act of administrating a sedative drug to produce a state of calm or sleep. Sedation is commonly given to a patient in hospital settings to provide a tolerable and pleasant experience by relieving anxiety, pain and discomfort, as well as to expedite the duration of the procedure. Moderate sedation (conscious sedation) is the preferred state of sedation, whereby self-maintenance of ventilation and hemodynamic stability is achieved. The primary objective of this study is to determine if inhalational Sevoflurane is a more superior sedative agent in terms of faster psychomotor recovery and time taken to fulfil discharge criteria when compared with intravenous Midazolam sedation. Secondary objective is to determine if inhalational Sevoflurane sedation has better patient's and endoscopist's satisfaction when compared with intravenous Midazolam sedation.

NCT ID: NCT04249141 Withdrawn - Pain Clinical Trials

Determinants of Implementation Success Coordinating Ventilator, Early Ambulation and Rehabilitation Efforts

DISCOVER-ICU
Start date: January 28, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

There is a fundamental gap between the discovery of proven-effective intensive care unit (ICU) sedation, mechanical ventilation, mobility, and symptom management strategies and approaches that can equip ICU providers with the skills necessary to reliably adopt these interventions in everyday practice. Until this gap is filled, the millions of patients with heart, lung, and blood disorders admitted to ICUs annually will remain at risk for avoidable physical, mental, and cognitive health impairments that may persist for months to years after hospital discharge. In the proposed study, the investigative team will continue their partnership with the Society of Critical Care Medicine's (SCCM's) ICU Liberation Collaborative. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, the overall objective of the Determinants of Implementation Success Coordinating Ventilator, Early Ambulation and Rehabilitation Efforts in the ICU (DISCOVER-ICU) study is to develop multilevel implementation strategies to enhance sustainable adoption of the ABCDEF (Assess, prevent, and manage pain and delirium, both spontaneous awakening and breathing trials, choice of sedation, early mobility, family engagement) bundle in routine ICU practice. Using a multiphase, sequential, mixed-methods design, this study has three specific aims: 1) estimate the effects of patient-level characteristics on ABCDEF bundle adoption; 2) examine unit-level variation in ABCDEF bundle adoption and associated provider- and organization-level characteristics; and 3) determine which implementation strategies result in the greatest adoption of the ABCDEF bundle. Existing deidentified data will be obtained from >15,000 patients, >5,000 interprofessional ICU team members, and 68 hospitals participating in the ICU Liberation Collaborative to achieve specific aims 1 and 2. For specific aim 3, data collection will be extended using interprofessional ICU team surveys, a modified Delphi process, and concept mapping to achieve greater understanding of implementation strategies that prove most effective for ABCDEF bundle adoption. Results of this work will directly lead to the development of implementation strategies that are adaptable, responsive to community needs, and account for the cultural and organizational factors necessary to increase ABCDEF bundle adoption. These implementation strategies will then be tested in a future cluster randomized hybrid II implementation effectiveness trial.

NCT ID: NCT04211298 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Sedation Complication

Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol Sedation in Flexible Bronchoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Start date: December 1, 2019
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The study will evaluate clinical outcomes during bronchoscopy procedures with dexmedetomidine in comparison to propofol. The clinical outcomes that will be evaluated are: oxygen saturation, transcutaneous Pco2, blood pressure and complications

NCT ID: NCT04206059 Active, not recruiting - Sleep Clinical Trials

Closed Loop Acoustic Stimulation During Sedation With Dexmedetomidine

CLASS-D
Start date: January 20, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Prospective within-subject study of dexmedetomidine sedation paired with CLAS conditions in repeated blocks. Intervention will consist of CLAS in-phase with EEG slow waves. Anti-phase stimulation will serve as an active control while sham stimulation will serve as a passive control.

NCT ID: NCT04049240 Recruiting - Obesity Clinical Trials

Effect of HFNO on Spontaneous Ventilation in Obese Patients During Analgo-sedation for Vitrectomy

Start date: August 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Patients suffering from pathology of posterior eye chamber such as diabetic retinopathy, retinal detachment, traumatic eye injury, retained lens fragments, macular hole, pucker, dislocated intraocular lens after cataract surgery or vitreomacular traction are often subjected to pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). PPV is minimally invasive endo-microscopic operation usually performed in topical anesthesia combined with sub-Tenon or retrobulbar block done by surgeon, supplemented by intravenous analgo-sedation given by anesthesiologist. Continuous infusion and dose adjustment of intravenous anesthetics applied should procure moderate sedation and preservation of patients' spontaneous ventilation. However, despite carefully applied anesthetics and standard low-flow nasal oxygenation (LFNO) (5 L/min O2 via nasal catheter), inadequate spontaneous breathing can occur leading to low blood oxygen level (hypoxia). Obese patients are susceptible to hypoxia and hypercapnia (high CO2 blood level) during analgo-sedation. Respiratory instability of obese patients is often associated to their subsequent circulatory instability (heart rate and blood pressure disorders). On the other hand, high-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO) is usually used during anesthesia induction when difficult maintenance of airway patency is expected, in intensive care units during weaning patients from mechanical respirator and in postanesthesia care units during awakening from anesthesia. It can deliver 20 to 70 L/min, up to 100% inspiratory fraction of O2 (FiO2) to patient. High oxygen/air flow produces 3-7 cmH2O of continuous pressure in patients' upper airways therefore providing better oxygenation. Oxygen/air mixture delivered by HFNO is humidified and heated, thus more comfortable to patient than dry and cold LFNO. Aim of this study is to compare effect of HFNO to LFNO during intravenously applied standardized analgo-sedation given for PPV in obese adult patients. Investigators hypothesize that obese patients, whose breathing pattern is preserved, receiving HFNO vs. LFNO during standardized analgo-sedation for PPV will be more respiratory and circulatory stable, preserving normal blood O2 and CO2 level, breathing pattern, heart rate and blood pressure.