View clinical trials related to Scoliosis.
Filter by:This observational study seeks to explore the potential association between thoracolumbar fascia characteristics and low back pain in individuals diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis.
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the immediate use of steroids after surgery for accelerated discharge in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and neuromuscular scoliosis after a posterior spinal fusion. The main question it aims to answer are: - What are the effects of using steroids immediately after surgery in decreasing opioid use and helping early mobilization(movement)? - Does post-operative steroid use affect the incidence of wound complications and are there any long-term impacts on scar formation? Participants will: - Fill out a Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) survey specifically for pain interference and physical activity observing health related quality of life at enrollment, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years - Have clinical photos of their incision at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years - Their photos will be assessed using the stony book scar evaluation scale - For treatment of their scoliosis, patients will undergo a posterior spinal fusion (PSF) per standard of care, however whether the participant receives or does not receive steroids is what the investigators are trying to understand. - Researchers will compare no immediate postoperative steroid (NS) to the group with immediate postoperative steroid (WS) group to see if there are changes in opioid use, wound complications, scar formation, and facilitation in early mobilization.
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is defined as a three-dimensional lateral deformity of the spine. It is described with a cobb angle of greater than 10 degrees. There is no known etiology of AIS. Once the degrees of curvature become severe (greater than 45 degrees), surgical intervention (posterior spinal fusion - PSF) is often discussed. Most adolescent patients and their families opt for surgical correction to decrease future complications of severe scoliosis, such as decreased vital capacity of the lungs, potential future activity restrictions, cosmetic appearance, and self-esteem. While the patient and family are eager to undergo PSF, they do have concerns. The major concerns are pain control and their ability to return to activities. In current literature, there are many studies completed regarding pharmacologic pain control management with the use of IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with opioids, narcotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, muscle relaxers, Tylenol, and gabapentin. However, there is not a well-established multimodal pain management plan for postoperative PSF patients. There is also no current literature discussing nonpharmacologic pain management methods, such as stretching, strengthening and yoga, for patients undergoing PSF. There are multiple studies discussing core stabilization used for helping AIS patients non-operatively. There is no literature discussing the use of nonpharmacologic pain management methods for improved pain control (including decreased use of pharmacologic agents) and quicker return to activities. The aim of this study is to determine if patients with AIS undergoing PSF require fewer pain medications and have an earlier return to activities if completing a yoga program six weeks prior to their surgery.
The goal of this observational study is to collect information about The Tether™ device in participants with progressive idiopathic scoliosis, Lenke Type 1 curves. The main purpose is to provide assessment of: - ongoing safety - probable benefits Participants who will receive The Tether™ during spine surgery will have to attend follow-up visits which are part of standard-of-care.
To examine the clinical efficacy of the Orthopaedic Manipulation Techniques of the Lin School of Lingnan Region in the treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Spinal cord injury is one of the most dangerous complications of scoliosis orthopedic surgery, and the Stagnara awakening test has been used in orthopedic spine surgery and is considered the "gold standard" for detecting spinal cord injury. During the awakening test, the patient is awakened from anesthesia and, in conjunction with a neurological assessment, moves his or her fingers and toes to determine the integrity of spinal cord motor function in order to avoid spinal cord injury. During this procedure, the patient still requires a degree of sedation and analgesia to tolerate tracheal intubation and surgical pain. Remazolam benzoate for injection is a new class of benzodiazepines that are ultra-short-acting sedative/anesthetic drugs. It has the advantages of rapid onset, rapid elimination, and no drug accumulation by continuous infusion, and has the advantage of being applied to wake up during spinal orthopedic surgery, but its effectiveness and safety are still unclear. This study aims to elucidate the safety and efficacy of rimazolam benzoate for injection for arousal in spinal orthopedic surgery through a single-center, randomized, single-blind, positive drug-controlled trial, with the aim of providing a basis for the development of a safe and effective anesthetic protocol for such surgery.
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of schroth method and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques on pain, mobility, and quality of life in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.
Background: Posterior column osteotomies (PCO) are routinely used to facilitate curve correction in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Data regarding routine use of PCO is controversial, with conflicting data for coronal and sagittal plane correction and clinical benefit. Use of PCO has not been studied in the surgical treatment of AIS in a prospective randomized clinical trial. Study Design: A randomized, multicenter clinical trial on children and adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis using pedicle screw instrumentation. Sixty consecutive adolescents will be randomized into PCO or no PCO group after surgical exposure of the spine in 1:1 ratio. Aims and Hypothesis: To compare PCO vs. no PCO groups for the correction of coronal and sagittal plane curve in children undergoing posterior spinal fusion for AIS. The investigators hypothesize that the correction of coronal curve and hypokyphosis will be better in PCO group without increasing blood loss or complications. Inclusion criteria: Adolescents (aged 10 to 21 years of age) undergoing corrective surgery for idiopathic scoliosis using pedicle screw technique. Exclusion criteria: Coagulation disorder, smoking, unwilling to consent, vertebral column resection, need for anteroposterior surgery. Main outcome parameters: Primary outcome is the radiographic correction (Coronal and sagittal plane). Secondary outcomes include health-related quality of life (Scoliosis Research Society 24 outcome questionnaire), postoperative pain, rib hump, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications. Ethical aspects: Ethical committee approval will be obtained. An informed consent will be obtained from all children and their parents. Time schedule and budget: This study has ethical committee approval.There will be no extra costs as all information gathered will be part of normal surgical treatment of AIS. A part-time research nurse has been hired to take care of data collection into the database.
We aimed to compare the paraspinal muscle cross-section area and functional results of anterior vertebral tethering and selective thoracic fusion surgery.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the acute effects of the self-elongation movement on the balance of patients (aged 8-16 years) suffering from adolescent idiopathic scoliosis,