View clinical trials related to Sclerosis.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to understand how well a 6-week virtual yogic breathing exercise program (YBEP) will improve breathing, speech, and emotional well-being in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
The goal of this non-interventional, observational study is to learn if cortical plexus enhancement in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis occurs in response to the autoimmune inflammatory process.
The goal of this non-interventional, observational study is to determine whether cortical pathology can be slowed down by use of ocrelizumab.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also known as Lou Gehrig's Disease, is a rare neurodegenerative disease resulting in loss, primarily, of the motor neurons in the motor cortex, brainstem and spinal cord. It currently affects 3 of every 100,000 people in the US. Currently, there is no diagnostic tool for ALS, resulting in misdiagnosis and significant disease progression before formal diagnosis. An imaging test for early detection of ALS and for monitoring disease progression would have significant diagnostic and prognostic value. PET imaging with an appropriate radiotracer has great potential as a biomarker for ALS given that it would permit visualization of central nervous system (CNS) pathology in individuals living with the disease. To that extent, the primary goal of this phase I study is evaluating the safety and biodistribution of the new tracer [89Zr]Zr-DFO-AP-101 in healthy volunteers and ALS patients.
The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of movement disorders in MS patients. Also,To know the clinical type of movement disorders occurring with multiple sclerosis patients and the MRI finding of those patients. Moreover, to find the correlation between the movement disorder and the different types of MS.
The purpose of this research is to support the clinical value of the Cionic Neural Sleeve for individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Background: Replications of studies employing transcranial direct stimulation (tDCS) shows great variations in physiological and behavioral outcomes. The disparity between studies is based on the expectations of getting the same cortical activity changes consistently once the procedures and current parameters have been repeated. Nevertheless, this assumption was inoperative, due to the individualized variations of numerous parameters such as: age, disease type, symptom severity, head geometry, etc. Objective: Through this clinical trial we aim to reduce the variability of the physiological and behavioral outcomes of tDCS by individualizing the current intensity and to study the neurophysiological and behavioral outcome differences between participants who receive the customized current intensity in comparison to the others who would receive a fixed dose. Methods: Based on individual patient's structural MRI images, the Electrical field (E-field) distribution can be modeled and the individualized current dose to stimulate a target region can be determined. A group of thirty persons with multiple sclerosis (PWMS) would be pseudo-randomized into three groups receiving all 3 treatments of individualized tDCS, fixed currents (2 mA), and sham tDCS. Baseline and post-intervention assessment of physiological and behavioral outcome measures will be assessed using respectively, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) recruitment curve and a stop-signal task and GO/No-go test. Significant statement and clinical relevance: Individualizing the patient's tDCS current intensity will result in a better clinical outcome (i.e. more robust physiological and behavioral effects), as compared to a tDCS application that is based on a fixed current.
Several prospective monocentric cohorts of between 250 and 1000 patients have been set up in order to characterize more precisely the evolution of the disease. Nevertheless, due to an initial recruitment carried out in the years 2000-2010, they do not constitute a faithful representation of the patients followed in clinical routine, in particular in terms of distribution of treatments. Indeed, the introduction, about 10 years ago, of high efficacy treatments (HET) has changed the management of the disease and a significant proportion of patients not controlled by medium efficacy treatments (MET) of the disease are now stable on HET. Nevertheless, if their short-term efficacy has been clearly demonstrated, it remains important to be able to confirm the superiority of HET over MET with the help of prospective cohorts (thus ensuring a retention of patients > 90% over the long term) analyzing all clinical and imaging biomarkers, imaging and biological data. The measurement of cerebral atrophy and its progression is probably one of the most interesting and most easily used biomarkers that can be used clinically to assess this silent progression in these groups of patients. The progression of brain atrophy is also dependent on many other non-modifiable but also modifiable factors outside of MS that need to be better evaluated and eventually managed. Nevertheless, the existence of various neurological comorbidities (sleep disorders, headaches) on this atrophy has not been specifically analyzed to date. The functional assessments used in routine follow-up are most often performed in a care facility and have many limitations: lack of reproducibility, inter/intra operator variability, poor correlation with functional and quality of life scales, etc. It is therefore extremely important to be able to identify new clinical biomarkers of disease progression of the disease by evaluating the physical capacities of the patients as precisely as possible. This study is a single-center, prospective cohort study of a population of 400 patients with relapsing remitting MS (RRMS). The main objective of this study is to compare, on morphological imaging criteria (T1 volumetry), the progression of brain atrophy (biomarker of disease progression) at 3 years in RRMS patients according to treatment line (MET vs HET).
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered cladribine versus placebo to stop inflammation and treat disease progression of non-active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Multiple sclerosis is an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. In most patients, it starts with a relapsing course (RMS) which is caused by acute inflammatory lesions in the brain and spinal cord. RMS transforms at later stages into progressive disease (secondary progressive MS). Currently approved disease-modifying treatments are effective in reducing clinical relapses and brain and spinal lesions visible in MR, but they perform poorly in preventing disease progression and overall disability accumulation. The growing evidence shows that disease progression partially depends on chronic inflammation present in the CNS. Drugs, which may cross the blood-brain barrier and reach inflammatory cells residing in the CNS might be effective in this stage of the disease. Cladribine is one of the DMT approved for RMS. It is a synthetic purine analog with selective lymphocyte toxicity, which enter the CNS and is found in cerebrospinal fluid. In patients treated with cladribine, the oligoclonal bands tend to disappear proving that neuroinflammation is diminished. The participants of this clinical trial with the later non-active stage of MS are enrolled to be treated with cladribine subcutaneously or a non-active comparator (placebo) for 6 months and followed for the next 2 years, with an MRI scan and clinical evaluation every 6 months. The main questions it aims to answer are if in the non-active stage of MS cladribine is potent to lessen brain volume loss and if it is potent to attenuate inflammation in the CNS.
On December 27th 2020, the implementation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in France first became available amongst all immunosuppressed patients at very high risk of severe Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) infection, specifically for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant recipients or other fragile immunosuppressed patients. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease characterized by dysregulation of the immune system, vascular damage and progressive fibrosis of the skin and internal organs (heart, lung and kidney) which may lead to severe comorbidities and SSc-related mortality. In severe rapidly progressive SSc, we and others demonstrated that autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is the only treatment so far allowing improvement in overall and event free survival up to 7 years after AHSCT. As soon as vaccines were available on January 1st, 2021 and following the French Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) and Société Francophone de Greffe de Moelle et de Thérapie Cellulaire (SFGM-TC) good clinical practices (GCP) guidelines, the ad hoc COVID19 vaccinations were proposed to all SSc patients in France, including those previously treated by AHSCT and followed at Maladies Auto Immunes et Thérapie Cellulaire (MATHEC) Center of Reference for stem cell therapy at St-Louis hospital. In July 2021, the Autoimmune Diseases Working Party (ADWP) and the European society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) guidelines recommended vaccination against SARS-CoV2 as early as 3 months after HSCT for autoimmune diseases. Only one Israeli study so far has analyzed the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination after autologous HSCT (AHSCT) in SSc patients.. We therefore designed the present case control study retrospective study to assess the acceptance and effectiveness of this vaccination program in SSc patients treated by AHSCT as compared to other fragile SSc individuals. The Primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing the anti-SARS-CoV2 vaccination program according to the French GCP for COVID-19 prophylaxis in SSc fragile patients, in terms of risk of asymptomatic or symptomatic COVID-19 infection, among SSc patients treated by AHSCT compared to 1:1 matched non transplant SSc controls.