View clinical trials related to Robotic Surgical Procedures.
Filter by:The purpose of this clinical trial is to observe the improvements in clinical symptoms and imaging outcomes for brainstem hemorrhage using robot-assisted stereotactic puncture, evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of this treatment, and explore the development of a high-precision, intelligent, and individualized microsurgical diagnosis and treatment process for brainstem hemorrhage. The main questions it aims to address are: - Establish a multi-center clinical database for brainstem hemorrhage. - Clinically observe and evaluate the intervention effects of robot-assisted stereotactic puncture on brainstem hemorrhage, compare it with the traditional conservative treatment control group, and investigate its efficacy and impact on patient survival, motor evoked potentials, and the degree of neurological deficits. - Optimize the Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm-based robotic surgical assistance system, and explore the prediction of preoperative brainstem hematoma stability and hematoma path planning. Participants in the experimental group will: - Undergo robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive surgery for brainstem hematoma puncture - Receive conservative non-surgical treatment. If there is a control group: the researchers will compare the conservative non-surgical treatment group to evaluate the effectiveness of robot-assisted stereotactic minimally invasive surgery for brainstem hematoma puncture.
To evaluate the safety of reoperation in patients with renal tumors who have ipsilateral tumor recurrence after nephron-sparing partial nephrectomy.
This is a multicenter, superior, randomized controlled trial designed to compare Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (RATME) and laparoscopic-assisted total mesorectal excision (LATME) for middle and low rectal cancer. The primary endpoint is the incidence of intersphincteric resection (ISR). The secondary outcomes are coloanal anastomosis (CAA), conversion to open, conversion to transanal TME (TaTME), incidence of abdominoperineal resection (APR), postoperative morbidity and mortality within 30 days after surgery, pathological outcomes, long-term survival outcomes, functional outcomes, and quality of life.
The primary aim of this interventional study is to investigate the impact of perioperative administration of Maxigesic (combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen) on delirium after minimally invasive lung surgery in elderly patients. The Maxigesic group receives a total of 5 doses of Maxigesic (20mg/kg, maximum dose per serving: 1g) every 6 h from immediately after anesthesia induction. The control group receives the same volume of normal saline. Researchers compare the incidence and severity of postoperative delirium for 5 days after surgery.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of endovascular interventional surgery instrument control system （ALLVAS®robot）and supporting consumables for coronary artery interventional surgery. Participants will will complete coronary intervention surgery with the assistance of robot system（ALLVAS®robot）, and evaluate the effect of the use effect of robots and clinical treatment after surgery
ReSECT is a project promoted by the Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery with the aim not only to become an indefinite, dynamic and inclusive registry, but also to establish a common structural framework for the development of future multicentre projects in the field of thoracic surgery in Spain. The goal of this nationwide prospective observational registry is: - To develop and validate forecasting tools based on powerful computational methods with the goal of assisting in decision-making and improving quality of care. - To evaluate the progressive implementation of certain surgical techniques that are on the rise, new technologies and future health programs. - To be aware of our results as specialty and professionals and to serve as a permanent benchmarking instrument in thoracic surgery. The first part of ReSECT, based on a personal registry design, will contemplate any thoracic surgical procedure performed by thoracic surgeons and residents in thoracic surgery in our country. Additionally, the Spanish thoracic surgery departments that voluntarily accept to collectively participate will contribute to specific surgical processes focused on certain procedures with specific objectives to be progressively implemented. The first and only surgical process implemented since the start of the ReSECT project will focus on patients to undergo anatomical lung resection with special interest in those cases whose reason for intervention was lung cancer. The main questions to answer in case of that first surgical process include: - What is the performance of current predictive models for perioperative and oncological outcomes in our country? - How could we modify previous predictive models to improve their performance? - What is the implementation of current guideline recommendations in our country and across institutions? - What is the potential impact of deviations from current recommendations? - What is my performance compared to the rest of the thoracic surgical departments in my country in terms of perioperative and oncological outcomes? ReSECT does not consider prespecified comparison groups of patients.
The aim of this study is to compare the changes in upper airway edema with the preoperative and postoperative ultrasonographic measurements of patients who undergo pobotic prostatectomy in the trendelenburg position. The secondary aim is to investigate the correlation between OSAS risk levels determined by the STOP-BANG score in the preoperative period of the patients participating in the study airway ultrasound measurements and postoperative critical respiratory events in the preoperative and postoperative period.
Minimal invasive techniques have become a well established approach for inguinal hernia repair over the last decade in developed countries. Different techniques such as total extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) have been described. These studies show comparable results in short and long term outcome. Robotic inguinal hernia surgery enables an even more precise dissection within the preperitoneal layer thus preserving the nerves of the lateral abdominal wall. This may translate into a reduced level of acute and chronic postoperative pain as previously reported by retrospective case series. The role of robotic surgery for inguinal hernia repair in regard of postoperative pain and recovery has not been investigated in randomized and blinded clinical studies yet. With this randomized and blinded trial the investigators compare robotic TAPP (rTAPP) to conventional TEP with a decreased pain level shortly after surgery as primary outcome (numeric rating scale - NRS). A reduced postoperative NRS for pain may translate into faster recovery and less chronic pain, secondary endpoints include comparison of pain in a longer course (short-form inguinal pain questionnaire (sf-IPQ)), quality of life / health status (Baseline Short Form-12 (SF-12), Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS)), complications (Comprehensive Complication Index - CCI), rate of recurrence, , economic impact in terms of costs of surgery per patient, for the institution, the sick leave and the cost-effectiveness of health intervention (SF-6D, EQ-5D, ICECAP-O). Also included are ergonomics for the surgeon (NASA TLX).
Robot-assisted surgery is spreading since the last decade, but little is known about the impact of the use of the robot on surgeon practices and behavior in the operation theatre. Interviewing senior surgeons trained for doing robot-assisted surgery, this qualitative study is expected to provide new insights to understand the surgeons' behavioral changes when using a robot. This study will contribute to improving training programs in robot-assisted surgery.
The current hypothesis is that robotic-assisted surgery results in a reduced systemic and peritoneal inflammatory response (SIRS) compared to laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of colon cancer. The purpose is to evaluate differences in the peritoneal and systemic inflammatory response in robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery of patients undergoing resection for colon cancer in a randomized, blinded controlled trial.