View clinical trials related to Rheumatic Diseases.
Filter by:The overall objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of a school-centered primary and secondary prevention program on the prevalence of latent rheumatic heart disease among schoolchildren in Nepal, and to investigate the role of socioeconomic and environmental factors in the development and progression of rheumatic heart disease.
The objective of CAMPS is to test and evaluate scalable models of secondary antibiotic adherence support for children newly diagnosed with rheumatic heart disease. Aim 1: Determine 1-year BPG adherence rates of children newly diagnosed with latent RHD in Uganda randomized to two support strategies: (1) Usual care (Arm 1) (2) peer group + case manager strategy (Arm 2). Aim 2: Explore patient reported outcomes including treatment satisfaction, patient health-related quality of life, and care giver quality of life, in relation to support strategy and adherence.
Telerehabilitation (TR) became more popular during COVID-19 pandemic due to social isolation and curfew. Exercise is one of treatments for patients with rheumatic diseases that are known to have low levels of physical activity.
Rheumatic heart disease usually accompanied by weakened immune function. And the cardiopulmonary bypass further aggravating the decline of immune function. Therefore, the prevention of Postoperative immune function collapse is of great clinical value, and immunomodulatory therapy with thymosin alpha 1 may be beneficial. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the administration of thymosin alpha 1 will Improve the immune function and prognosis of patients.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the patient engagement with digital tools for diagnosis and monitoring of disease in rheumatology services
The primary objective of the STAR study is to investigate how measures of disease activity and measures for cognition, physical activity and performance behave in ageing population controls and patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). If an differential effect of age on outcome over time is apparent, the presence of an inclination point will be assessed. The secondary objective is to investigate additional factors (e.g. lifestyle factors) that might explain any differences between ageing controls and RA patients. The STAR study is an observational cross-sectional matched case-control study including 420 RA patients and 420 population controls between 55-85 years of age, stratified by five year intervals. All participants will complete generic and RA-specific questionnaires. A subset of 180 participants will be visiting the research center for physical examination and performance tests. Expected outcomes include practical age-specific reference curves that will be constructed for a selection of outcomes (e.g. DAS28). It is expected that as RA is characterized by tender and painful joints, e.g. the number of tender joints has a higher starting point in RA patients than in the general population. This will most likely increase in both groups with age, although the general population may catch up at an older age. Measures of cognitive status may show a steeper decline with age in RA patients compared to the general population. Measures of physical activity and performance will presumably have a worse starting point in RA patients than in the general population, and might show a steep decline with age. The general population might however catch up with the patients with RA. Most probably, age will not be the only factor explaining 'worse' outcomes in both RA patients and the general population. Other factors such as lifestyle factors (e.g. smoking, diet, BMI, occupation) and comorbidities will probably play a role.
Sub-optimal transfer of clinical information during inter-hospital transfer (IHT, the transfer of patients between acute care hospitals) is common and can lead to patient harm. To address this problem, the investigators will use key stakeholder input to refine and implement an interoperable health information exchange platform that integrates with the electronic health record and improves the reliability of and access to necessary clinical information in three use cases involving transfer of patients between sending and receiving hospitals with varying levels of affiliation and health record integration. The investigators will assess the effect of this intervention on frequency of medical errors, evaluate the use and usability of this platform from the perspective of those that interact with it, and use these results to develop a dissemination plan to spread implementation and use of this platform across other similar institutions.
Musculoskeletal pathologies constitute a major public health problem. Rheumatologists, whether they practice in private or hospital settings, play a major role in the management of responsible for these ailments. Due to the increase in life expectancy, an increase in the number of consultations can be expected. It is therefore imperative that the latter be more efficient, without losing quality. Communication between doctor and patient is bound to evolve due to the multiplicity of IT tools available and those that are emerging, which are increasingly essential, including many smartphone applications. Each targeting a specific pathology (rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, osteoporosis osteoarthritis, they will allow the patient to self-assess, thus becoming an actor in his own care. A "facilitated" exchange between caregivers and patients would be relevant and would provide added value for all. This is the reason why there is a real need for an application listing precise information on the patient, in a sufficiently succinct way to optimize their transmission to the physiotherapist.
Does a group programme already delivered in routine practice to patients who share a diagnosis from the same medical speciality (i.e. specific-diagnosis) show equal effectiveness when modified for patients with diagnoses from a range of medical specialities (i.e. mixed-diagnosis)? A large number of people live with a long-term condition (LTC) and the burden of living with a LTC is recognised on a societal and individual level. Links between LTCs and poorer mental health increase demand on psychological services. Consequently new initiatives try to reduce waiting times and increase the capacity of these services. Group programmes use resources efficiently and have been applied across a range of medical specialities. A clinical health psychology service has adopted a group programme based on a well evidenced psychological therapeutic approach called Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), for patients with dermatology conditions showing promising outcomes. However, the investigators want to compare whether similar outcomes can be achieved with patients from a range of specialities. The investigators conducted quantitative and qualitative research to answer the research questions a) Does an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy group intervention for specific-diagnosis groups suggest similar effectiveness in health-related quality of life, illness beliefs and psychological distress versus mixed-diagnosis groups? b) Is there a difference in feasibility and acceptability of an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention between specific-diagnosis groups versus mixed-diagnosis groups? c) What are health professionals' views on the acceptability and feasibility of specific-diagnosis versus mixed-diagnosis groups and their experiences of working with patients who have attended such groups? Participants were recruited from the Clinical Health Psychology waiting list at a UK NHS Trust. Participants attended 7, two-hour weekly sessions and an 8 week follow-up 'reunion', and completed health related quality of life, illness perceptions, depression and anxiety questionnaires pre and post intervention. Patient participants and health professional participants (facilitators and referrers) were invited to attend focus groups to discuss their views and experiences.
Various studies have shown that many patients do not understand all the information provided by the study investigator and by the information sheet before entering a clinical research protocol. Many materials has been developped in previous research, trying to improve patients' understanding. Nonetheless, their effectiveness remains uncertain. The "LUMINA" project aims to measure the effectiveness of the booklet named "Comprendre les essais cliniques" with patients included or not included in clinical trials within the Clinical Neurosciences - Rheumatology pole of the CHU de Nice. The design of this study is "before/after". A questionnaire was submitted to the patients before and after reading the booklet. That method is used in order to show if there was a difference between the score obtained from the questionnaire before and after reading. This difference could reflect an improvement in patients' comprehension and, by extension, the effectiveness of the support the team developed.