Pragmatic Investigation of Volume Targeted Ventilation-1

Respiratory Failure Clinical Trial

— PIVOT-1  

Official title:

Pragmatic Investigation of Volume Targeted Ventilation-1 (PIVOT-1)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03909854
• Other study ID #: IRB00055128
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: September 9, 2019
• Est. completion date: February 20, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: January 2023
• Source: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This proposal will test the feasibility of implementing an assist volume control ventilation protocol in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the medical intensive care unit. The trial will consist of a before-and-after trial design of block assignment to either adaptive pressure control (baseline) or assist volume control . This is a feasibility study looking at the management of patients in the ventilator.

Description:

Over the course of 6 weeks, a before-and-after trial design of adaptive pressure control and assist volume control will be conducted. Pre-trial planning phase: study protocols will be reviewed with key stakeholders (respiratory therapy providers and medical teams) Weeks 1-2: data will be collected on our current adaptive pressure control ventilator protocol. Week 3: The investigators will implement an assist volume control protocol. . Patients already on mechanical ventilation will be converted to assist volume control; however, these patients will not be included in the primary analysis.In accordance with the Consolidated Framework For Implementation Research (CFIR) approach, after 1 week of assist volume control the investigators will engage in quantitative and qualitative feedback with care providers to identify facilitators and barriers of assist volume control implementation. Week 4-6: If the investigators identify substantial barriers, the investigators will pause and alter the protocol. If not, the investigators will continue assist volume control for an additional 2 weeks.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 139
• Est. completion date: February 20, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: November 12, 2019
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

Acute Respiratory Failure requiring mechanical ventilation medical intensive care unit admission Exclusion Criteria: chronic mechanical ventilation clinician use of non-volume-targeted ventilation as initial mode

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Acute Lung Injury
• Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
• Respiratory Distress Syndrome
• Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
• Respiratory Failure
• Respiratory Insufficiency
• Ventilator Lung

Intervention

Procedure:
• mode of mechanical ventilation
Adaptive Pressure Control mechanical ventilation is a dual controlled mode that is designed to auto-control flow and minimize inspiratory pressure while delivering a provider-determined tidal volume. Assist Volume Control mechanical ventilation is a mode in which the respiratory care provider determines patient tidal volume and flow.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center	Winston-Salem	North Carolina

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (17)

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801. — View Citation

Branson RD, Chatburn RL. Controversies in the critical care setting. Should adaptive pressure control modes be utilized for virtually all patients receiving mechanical ventilation? Respir Care. 2007 Apr;52(4):478-85; discussion 485-8. — View Citation

Casey JD, Janz DR, Russell DW, Vonderhaar DJ, Joffe AM, Dischert KM, Brown RM, Zouk AN, Gulati S, Heideman BE, Lester MG, Toporek AH, Bentov I, Self WH, Rice TW, Semler MW; PreVent Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Bag-Mask Ventilation during Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 28;380(9):811-821. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812405. Epub 2019 Feb 18. — View Citation

Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 7;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50. — View Citation

Esteban A, Frutos-Vivar F, Muriel A, Ferguson ND, Penuelas O, Abraira V, Raymondos K, Rios F, Nin N, Apezteguia C, Violi DA, Thille AW, Brochard L, Gonzalez M, Villagomez AJ, Hurtado J, Davies AR, Du B, Maggiore SM, Pelosi P, Soto L, Tomicic V, D'Empaire G, Matamis D, Abroug F, Moreno RP, Soares MA, Arabi Y, Sandi F, Jibaja M, Amin P, Koh Y, Kuiper MA, Bulow HH, Zeggwagh AA, Anzueto A. Evolution of mortality over time in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul 15;188(2):220-30. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201212-2169OC. — View Citation

Figueroa-Casas JB, Montoya R. Effect of Tidal Volume Size and Its Delivery Mode on Patient-Ventilator Dyssynchrony. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Dec;13(12):2207-2214. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201605-362OC. — View Citation

Kallet RH, Campbell AR, Dicker RA, Katz JA, Mackersie RC. Work of breathing during lung-protective ventilation in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a comparison between volume and pressure-regulated breathing modes. Respir Care. 2005 Dec;50(12):1623-31. — View Citation

Meinecke AK, Welsing P, Kafatos G, Burke D, Trelle S, Kubin M, Nachbaur G, Egger M, Zuidgeest M; work package 3 of the GetReal consortium. Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 8. Data collection and management. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;91:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 14. — View Citation

Mireles-Cabodevila E, Chatburn RL. Work of breathing in adaptive pressure control continuous mandatory ventilation. Respir Care. 2009 Nov;54(11):1467-72. — View Citation

Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP, Ehrenfeld JM, Wang L, Byrne DW, Stollings JL, Kumar AB, Hughes CG, Hernandez A, Guillamondegui OD, May AK, Weavind L, Casey JD, Siew ED, Shaw AD, Bernard GR, Rice TW; SMART Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 1;378(9):829-839. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1711584. Epub 2018 Feb 27. — View Citation

Serpa Neto A, Simonis FD, Barbas CS, Biehl M, Determann RM, Elmer J, Friedman G, Gajic O, Goldstein JN, Horn J, Juffermans NP, Linko R, de Oliveira RP, Sundar S, Talmor D, Wolthuis EK, de Abreu MG, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ. Association between tidal volume size, duration of ventilation, and sedation needs in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul;40(7):950-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3318-4. Epub 2014 May 9. — View Citation

Shah FA, Girard TD, Yende S. Limiting sedation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome - time to wake up. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017 Feb;23(1):45-51. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000382. — View Citation

Sjoding MW, Gong MN, Haas CF, Iwashyna TJ. Evaluating Delivery of Low Tidal Volume Ventilation in Six ICUs Using Electronic Health Record Data. Crit Care Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):56-61. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003469. — View Citation

Writing Group for the PReVENT Investigators; Simonis FD, Serpa Neto A, Binnekade JM, Braber A, Bruin KCM, Determann RM, Goekoop GJ, Heidt J, Horn J, Innemee G, de Jonge E, Juffermans NP, Spronk PE, Steuten LM, Tuinman PR, de Wilde RBP, Vriends M, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ. Effect of a Low vs Intermediate Tidal Volume Strategy on Ventilator-Free Days in Intensive Care Unit Patients Without ARDS: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Nov 13;320(18):1872-1880. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14280. — View Citation

Wunsch H, Wagner J, Herlim M, Chong DH, Kramer AA, Halpern SD. ICU occupancy and mechanical ventilator use in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2013 Dec;41(12):2712-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318298a139. — View Citation

Yoshida T, Fujino Y, Amato MB, Kavanagh BP. Fifty Years of Research in ARDS. Spontaneous Breathing during Mechanical Ventilation. Risks, Mechanisms, and Management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 15;195(8):985-992. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0748CP. — View Citation

Zuidgeest MGP, Goetz I, Groenwold RHH, Irving E, van Thiel GJMW, Grobbee DE; GetReal Work Package 3. Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 1. Introduction. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;88:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.023. Epub 2017 May 24. — View Citation

* Note: There are 17 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Percentage of patients receiving Assist Volume Control	The primary outcome for the PIVOT-1 pilot is feasibility of Assist Volume Control implementation. We define feasibility in this study as 80% of patients receiving Assist Volume Control within 1 hour of initiation of intensive care unit mechanical ventilation	1 hour
Secondary	assist volume control duration	A secondary feasibility outcome will be >70% of ventilated time on Assist Volume Control during the first 24 hours of mechanical ventilation.	24 hours
Secondary	Percentage of mode crossover	A secondary feasibility outcome will include <10% crossover to the alternative mode	2 weeks
Secondary	exhaled tidal volume	exhaled tidal volume will be compared between modes using data extracted from the critical care data capsule.	2 weeks
Secondary	Number of ventilator free days	vent free days will be compared between the modes using data from the critical care data analytics platform	28 days
Secondary	intensive care length of stay	intensive care unit length of stay will be compared between the modes using data from the critical care data analytics platform	28 days