View clinical trials related to Renal Impairment.
Filter by:The TRENT trial is designed to confirm the efficacy and safety of Gla-300 compared with IDeg-100 in insulin-naïve patient (participants who have not tried insulin) with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and renal impairment. It will test the hypothesis that Gla-300 is non-inferior to IDeg-100 with glucose control. If achieved, the trial will also test for the superiority of Gla-300 compared with IDeg-100 in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) reduction, without an increased potential risk of hypoglycemia.
The purpose of this study is to understand the effects of kidney functional impairment may have on the study medicine (PF-07081532). People with certain level of kidney functional impairment may process PF-07081532 differently from healthy people. PF-07081532 is developed as a potential treatment for type II diabetes. Participants will take the study medicine as a tablet by mouth once at the study clinic and then will stay at the study clinic for about 7 days. During that time, the study team will monitor their treatment experience and take some blood samples to test the level of PF-07081532. This will help us understand if certain degree of kidney functional impairment will have an effect on the study medicine PF-07081532.
The purpose of this study is to compare the plasma and urine pharmacokinetics (PK) of MK-3402 in participants with impaired renal function and healthy control participants, to investigate the extent to which MK-3402 is removed from the plasma by hemodialysis (HD), and evaluate the safety and tolerability of MK-3402 in participants with impaired renal function.
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of JNJ-64417184, JNJ-68294291, and JNJ-65201526 after a single oral dose of JNJ-64417184 in adult participants with various degrees of impaired renal function (moderate [optional], severe renal impairment, and end stage renal disease (ESRD) not requiring hemodialysis) compared to participants with normal renal function.
This is a Phase 1 non-randomized, open-label, parallel cohort study of PF-06651600 in subjects with severe renal impairment and subjects without renal impairment (Part 1) and in subjects with mild and moderate renal impairment (Part 2).
This was a multicenter study of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of melphalan during treatment with melflufen and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and impaired renal function.
Significant pain is a common condition in dying patients. Continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI) of opioids is the cornerstone in treatment of pain in this last phase of life. Although morphine is the most frequent used opioid in this respect, burdensome adverse effects, like delirium and allodynia/hyperalgesia, can occur in dying patients, due to accumulation of morphine metabolites in decreasing renal function. Oxycodone seems preferable in this situation, as central effects of circulating metabolites of oxycodone are negligible. However, studies of sufficient quality investigating the clinical effect of this hypothesis are lacking at the moment. This study investigates whether there is a difference in occurrence of delirium and allodynia/hyperalgesia between oxycodone and morphine. Residents of hospices and somatic or psychogeriatric (PG) wards of nursing homes in the Netherlands, who are eligible for start of CSCI of an opioid for the treatment of pain in the terminal phase of life, are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives CSCI of oxycodone and the other group CSCI of morphine. 117 patients per group are needed. Occurrence of delirium and allodynia/hyperalgesia is assessed three times a week until death of the participant. Quality of dying, as perceived by the patient's relatives, is assessed in an interview with a relative after death.
The purpose of this study is to characterize the effect of renal function on the PK of a 0.25 mg single oral dose of bevenopran in humans and to assess the safety and tolerability of bevenopran in patients with varying degrees of renal impairment and in healthy subjects.
Part I is a 3-period, active comparator-controlled, fixed sequence study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of MK-7145 compared to furosemide in participants with moderate-to-severe renal insufficiency (RI) without heart failure (HF). Primary hypothesis for Part I is that at least one well-tolerated dose of MK-7145 will produce a greater 24hr urinary excretion of sodium (UNa) on the 1st day of MK-7145 dosing than 80 mg furosemide (on the 1st day of furosemide dosing) in participants with moderate-to-severe RI. If MK-7145 is safe at natriuretic doses in RI in Part I of this study, MK-7145 will be investigated in participants with heart failure (HF) and RI (Part II). Part II is 4 period, fixed sequence, active comparator controlled (in Period 1), titration (in Periods 2, 3 and 4) study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a titration regimen of MK-7145 compared to an optimized stable maintenance regimen of furosemide or torsemide in participants with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II and III heart failure and moderate or severe renal insufficiency. The primary hypothesis for Part II is that at least one dose of MK-7145, titrated according to a fixed dose titration regimen, will be associated with a reduction in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) compared to furosemide or torsemide (at 24 hours post morning dose on the last dosing day of each period) in participants with NYHA class II/III HF with moderate or severe RI.
The purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics and the safety of varespladib methyl in mild or moderate renal impairment patients and healthy volunteers.