Clinical Trials Logo

Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT00637533 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

A Pilot Clinical Trial of Sympathetic Blockade With Botulinum Toxin Type A to Treat Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS): a Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled, Crossover Trial.

Start date: May 2004
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Lumbar sympathetic blocks are part of the standard of care for treating patients with sympathetically-maintained pain (e.g. in complex regional pain syndrome or reflex sympathetic dystrophy- RSD). In these patients lower extremity pain can be reduced or abolished temporarily by blocking sympathetic nerves by doing a lumbar sympathetic block. Patients who respond only transiently to sympathetic blocks often choose between potentially dangerous lumbar sympathetic block with neurolytic agents, surgical sympathectomy, continued severe refractory debilitating pain or other risky invasive surgical procedures such as spinal cord electrical stimulation.. It is hypothesized that Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTA) injected in a lumbar sympathetic block can provide extended sympathetic blockade and thus pain relief. This pilot study aims to see if BTA can be used safely in lower extremity sympathetic blocks, and might be useful in providing prolonged pain relief.

NCT ID: NCT00625976 Completed - Clinical trials for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I

Graded Exposure (GEXP) in Vivo Versus Physiotherapy in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I (CRPS-I)

Start date: May 2008
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Background: Research on the treatment of CRPS-I, as described in the Dutch evidence based treatment guidelines (Richtlijn Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type I, 2006), mainly showed improvement at the level of pain and coping with pain. Only little improvement in functional restoration was found. Research in other pain populations such al neck- and back-pain patients has shown that pain related fear contributes to the development of functional disability. GEXP in vivo which aims on systematically reducing fear of movement, shows promising results in CRPS-I patients (de Jong et al., 2005). Objective: The objective of the proposed project is to compare the effectivity of GEXP in vivo with that of standardized physiotherapy in CRPS-I patients with pain related fear. Design: The study concerns a single blinded, single center, randomized clinical trial. The treatment will be preceded by two pre-measures. After treatment there will be one post-measurement and 3, 6 and 12 month follow-up measurements. Population: The study population will consist of chronic CRPS-I patients between 18 and 65, with pain related fear (PHODA-LE-score ≥ 35 and PHODA-UE-score ≥ 32). Intervention: The two interventions that will be compared are GEXP in vivo (de Jong et al., 2005) and standardized physiotherapy according to the protocol of Oerlemans, Oostendorp, de Boo en Goris (1999). The GEXP in vivo comprises 17 sessions of one hour, the physiotherapy treatment of 34 sessions of 30 minutes. Both treatments will be given over a period of 17 weeks.

NCT ID: NCT00595439 Completed - Focal Dystonia Clinical Trials

Association Between Focal Dystonia and Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Start date: December 21, 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

This study will investigate differences among people with focal dystonia (FD), complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and people who have both conditions to learn more about the cause of both disorders. Participants undergo the following procedures in five visits: - Electroencephalography (EEG). Electrodes (metal discs) are placed on the scalp with an electrode cap, a paste or a glue-like substance. The spaces between the electrodes and the scalp are filled with a gel that conducts electrical activity. Brain waves are recorded while the subject lies quietly and sensory stimulation is applied to the thumb or finger. - Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This test uses a magnetic field and radio waves to obtain images of body tissues and organs. The patient lies on a table that can slide in and out of the scanner, wearing earplugs to muffle loud knocking and thumping sounds that occur during the scanning process. The procedure lasts about 45 minutes, during which time the patient will be asked to lie still for up to 15 minutes at a time. - Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). An insulated wire coil is placed on the scalp and a brief electrical current is passed through the coil. The current induces a magnetic field that stimulates the brain. There may be a pulling sensation on the skin under the coil and a twitch in muscles of the face, arm or leg. During the stimulation, subjects may be asked to keep their hands relaxed or to contract certain muscles. - Peripheral electrical stimulation. In two experiments, TMS is combined with peripheral electrical stimulation, similar to what is used in nerve conduction studies, to the median nerve at the wrist. There may be muscle twitching. - Surface electromyography. For TMS tests and peripheral electrical stimulation, electrodes are filled with a conductive gel and taped to the skin to record the electrical activity of three muscles on the right hand. - Needle EMG. A needle is inserted into a muscle to record the electrical activity. - Nerve conduction studies. A probe is placed on the skin to deliver a small electrical stimulus, and wires are taped to the skin record the nerve impulses. These studies measure the speed with which nerves conduct electrical impulses and the strength of the connection between the nerve and the muscles. - Skin biopsy. Two sites are biopsied. A local anesthetic is given to numb the area and a 1/4-inch piece of skin is removed with a special tool. - JVP domes. Subjects are tested for their ability to discriminate sensory stimuli in the affected region and on the other side of it. They are asked to discriminate between stamps with grooves of different widths that are applied to the hands or feet.

NCT ID: NCT00579085 Completed - Clinical trials for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study of Outpatient Intravenous Ketamine for the Treatment of CRPS

Start date: September 2006
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome is a debilitating and extremely difficult to treat condition. There is a large body of evidence demonstrating the therapeutic value of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonists in CRPS. The NMDA antagonist ketamine has been shown to be effective in the treatment of CRPS, resulting in complete remission of the disease in some patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate intravenous outpatient infusion of sub-anesthetic doses of ketamine for the treatment of CRPS. A thorough evaluation of this procedure, providing information into the degree of relief and which of the constellation of RSD symptoms are best alleviated by this procedure would result in the optimization of this therapy for the treatment of CRPS.

NCT ID: NCT00560131 Completed - Clinical trials for CRPS (Complex Regional Pain Syndromes)

Evaluation of Autonomic Cardiac Function in Patients With CRPS

Start date: June 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

To evaluate the autonomic cardiac function in patients with complex regional pain syndrome

NCT ID: NCT00558753 Completed - CRPS Clinical Trials

Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial on Perioperative Pregabalin to Reduce Late-onset CRPS After TKA

PregTKA
Start date: April 2006
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The Department of Anesthesiology is conducting a clinical trial to evaluate if pregabalin given prior to and for several days after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) will reduce the prevalence of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) at late postoperative times. The prevalence of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is 13% at 6 months post-surgery. CRPS is a painful debilitating condition, with 4 main classes of symptoms : sensory, including burning, allodynia, and hyperalgesia in the affected limb; vasomotor, including temperature asymmetry and skin color changes; edema and sudomotor, including sweating; and movement disorders and dystrophy, including decreased range of motion, motor dysfunction (weakness, tremor, dystonia) and changes in hair, nails or skin.

NCT ID: NCT00468390 Completed - Clinical trials for CRPS (Complex Regional Pain Syndromes)

Capsaicin-Evoked Pain in Patients With CRPS

Start date: April 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

To evaluate the effect of capsaicin in patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.

NCT ID: NCT00462566 Completed - Neuropathic Pain Clinical Trials

The Efficacy of Motor Cortex Stimulation for Pain Control

Start date: October 2005
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The objective is to determine if motor cortex stimulation works for the following conditions: 1. Deafferentation facial pain, 2. Upper extremity complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and 3. Brachial plexus avulsion or phantom limb pain. Each of these groups of 6 patients (total of 18) will be studied independently and all patients will be implanted with a motor cortex stimulation system. They will be randomised to either a regular or low stimulation setting in the two arms of the study. Each arm will last 3 months.

NCT ID: NCT00431847 Active, not recruiting - Anxiety Disorders Clinical Trials

Regional Anesthesia Military Battlefield Pain Outcomes Study

RAMBPOS
Start date: October 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The purpose of this study is to examine the short and long-term benefits of implementing early regional anesthesia techniques for pain control after a major traumatic injury to one or more extremities during combat in the Iraqi/Afghanistan war, including the effects on acute and chronic pain, quality of life, and mental health.

NCT ID: NCT00414804 Withdrawn - Pain Clinical Trials

Spinal Cord Stimulation Versus Nerve Blocks and Physical Therapy

Start date: December 2006
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of SCS using the Precision implantable neurostimulation device and conventional medical treatment (nerve blocks + physical therapy) in subjects with recently-diagnosed Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) after some more conservative treatments have failed. There are significant numbers of patients with CRPS in whom conventional treatment is ineffective and SCS is used only as a last resort. If SCS is effective earlier in the treatment continuum, it would provide a much needed treatment alternative and increase awareness of the utility of SCS for this indication. It is also possible that early intervention with SCS may limit disease progression.