View clinical trials related to Rectal Neoplasms.
Filter by:GRECCAR 17 will be the first prospective and randomized trial to assess a tailored policy in the use of defunctioning stoma after TME according to the personalized risk of anastomotic leakage. The tailored use of defunctioning stoma after TME for rectal cancer should improve both the quality of life of patients and the anorectal function, without any impact on anastomotic leakage. Moreover, for the healthcare system, this new approach could be a cost-effective strategy, leading to a decrease in healthcare expenses. The main objective is to compare the impact of tailored defunctioning stoma after TME for rectal cancer versus the systematic use of defunctioning stoma on the evolution of the specific Quality Of Life (QLQC30) during the 12 months after surgery.
In the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, the short-term and long-term efficacy of the traditional sandwich regimen has not reached satisfactory efficacy. For this reason, the concept of reducing the dose of postoperative chemotherapy or directly moving forward the full amount of postoperative chemotherapy was proposed, which is called total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). However, TNT also includes the high toxicity of oxaliplatin in the whole process and the long time interval between the end of radiotherapy and the operation, which leads to fibrosis of the surrounding tissue, which increases the difficulty of surgical resection and makes it difficult to ensure good surgical specimen quality. In addition to this, there are issues that may increase the risk of potential disease progression in patients with poor treatment withdrawal. Therefore, appropriately reducing the intensity of chemotherapy and controlling the total duration of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy during radiotherapy is expected to alleviate the side effects of neoadjuvant therapy. Here, the investigators synthesized the characteristics of TNT and sandwich regimens and proposed a XELOX regimen and capecitabine alternate administration combined with preoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy.
This multicentre randomized controlled trial aims to investigate whether an abbreviated MRI is comparable to a combined single venous phase CT with an additional 3 min equilibrium phase of the liver, in the pretreatment radiological workup in patients with rectal cancer.
At present, there are no relevant studies or reports on the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy combined with immunotherapy for MSS ultra-low rectal cancer. Studied in this paper combin neoadjuvant chemoradiation with immune therapy, carry out "Multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy combined with immunotherapy for MSS ultra-low rectal cancer" in order to provide a high-level evidence-based medical evidence for ultra-low rectal cancer treatment and improve ultra-low rectal cancer diagnosis and treatment effect.
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the differences of oncological in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or transanal endoscopy radical resection. The secondary purpose is to compare the effect of two different surgical methods on prognosis.
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the differences of bacteriological in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or transanal endoscopy radical resection. The secondary purpose is to compare the effects of two different surgical methods on postoperative complications.
This is a phase III randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of FOLFOXIRI versus CapeOX as neoadjuvant regimen in treating patients with middle and upper locally advanced (MRI T3-4 or N+) rectal cancer. This study aims to optimize the neoadjuvant therapy for patients with anus-preserving resectable locally advanced rectal cancer, so as to improve the prognosis of them. It remains unclear about whether FOLFOXIRI or CapeOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy is more effective for locally advanced rectal cancer.
Diverting ileostomy seems to mitigate the consequences of anastomotic leak from low rectal anastomosis. Gastrointestinal continuity is restored after a period of 6-12 weeks but it can be longer if the patient is on adjuvant chemotherapy or due to low priority given to this procedure. This exposes up to one-third of the patients to significant morbidity having an impact on the quality of life and considerable economic costs. Although no meta-analysis data determined the safety and optimal time for the closure of a temporary diversion of the small bowel, earlier reversal of ileostomies a few days after primary anastomosis reduces the length of exposure to stoma-related morbidity and may improve quality of life, reduce stoma-related costs and still protect the distal anastomosis. Herein, we aimed to assess the results of early closure of defunctioning ileostomy a week following a satisfactory anastomosis, negative air leak test and smooth post-operative course and in absence of worrisome clinical signs of anastomotic leak with optional intraoperative visualization of the anastomostic line by endoscopy immediately before closing the ileostomy.
Observational study that will be collecting clinical and molecular health information from cancer patients who have received comprehensive genomic profiling and meet the specific eligibility criteria outlined for each cohort with the goal of conducting research to advance cancer care and create a dataset that furthers cancer research.
The question of how to administer adequate chemotherapy and immunotherapy to synchronise hypofraction radiotherapy （HFRT） treatment strategy to maximise the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy for the improved prognosis of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).We aimed to study whether chemotherapy and tislelizumab plus split-course HFRT results in better outcomes in LARC patients.