View clinical trials related to Rectal Neoplasms.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the short-term outcomes of roboric natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES-II) compared to conventional assisted robotic surgery in the treatment of median rectal cancer. The main question it aims to answer is: is it safe and feasible to perform roboric natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES-II) for median rectal cancer? What are the advantages of roboric natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES-II) compared to conventional assisted robotic surgery for median rectal cancer.
The surgical management of rectal cancer includes a Total Mesorectal Exicison (TME). TME can be performed by open, laparoscopic, robotic or transanal approaches, as long as the oncological principles for the resection are achieved. Unfortunately, up to 90% of these patients will present a change in bowel habit, ranging from an increased frequency of bowel movements to the degree of fecal incontinence or evacuation dysfunction. Of these patients, 25-50% will have a severe alteration in the quality of life. This wide spectrum of symptoms has been called "low anterior resection syndrome" (LARS). Other collateral damage is the change in sexual and urinary function, due to hypogastric plexus injury. There is a significant lack of multicenter prospective studies that provide evidence, and that reveal the functional results and quality of life of these techniques available to date for the management of rectal cancer. The study is set up as a prospective multicentre observational study. Inclusion criteria are: 1) patients over 18 years old, 2) diagnosed with rectal cancer located below the peritoneal reflection, defined by pereoperative MRI, 3) undergoing Open, laparoscopic, robotic or Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (taTME) approaches, 4) with/withou derivative stoma and 5) with/without neoadjuvant treatment. Exclusion criteria are: 1) Upper rectal cancer, located above the peritoneal reflection, 2) previous radical prostatectomy, 3) previous pelvic radiotherapy, 4) rectal resection without primary anastomosis, 5) intraoperative findings of peritoneal carcinomatosis, 6) stage IV disease, 7) multivisceral or en-bloc resection, which includes uterus, prostate, vagina or bladder, 8) rectal resection due to a benign condition, 9) rectal resection due to a recurrence of rectal cancer (previous anterior resection or another pimary neoplasm), 10) rectal resection following a 'watch & wait' program, 11) emergency surgery, 12) previous derivative colostomy 13) inflammatory bowel disease. Accepting an alpha risk of 0.05 and a beta risk of 0.2 in a two-sided test, 45 subjects are necessary in first group and 45 in the second to recognize as statistically significant a difference greater than or equal to 2 units. The common standard deviation is assumed to be 3. It has been anticipated a drop-out rate of 20% Primary outcomes are LARS and Vaizey score. Secondary outcomes included are QLQ C30 and CR29, sexual function questionnaire (female/male), urinary function questionnaire and postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification) Data will be collected in an online secure and protected repository (Castor edc). The planned study period is 2 years (September 2021 - September 2023). It is essential to have a validated instrument that allows us to assess sphincter function and the different aspects of quality of life in operated patients, since increased survival in this pathology has led to greater importance in the evaluation functional outcome and quality of life; Furthermore, there are recent studies that speak of the direct relationship between these factors.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare in newly diagnosed patients with resectable rectal cancer with lateral lymph node metastasis. This study aims to - further verify the safety and efficacy of FOLFOXIRI three-drug regimen - Using multiple omics techniques to identify and confirm specific molecular markers Participants will be treated with FOLFOXIRI three-drug combination regimen. Researchers will compare another group treated with conventional preoperative chemoradiotherapy to see if the experimental group is superior to the control group in terms of 3-year disease free survival, local recurrence rate, lateral lymph node positivity rate, and 5-year overall survival rate.
The incidence rate of colorectal cancer is third in male tumors and second in female tumors. The newly diagnosed incidence of colorectal cancer is no less than 100 thousand in China, which poses a great threat to people's health and a heavy burden of public health. Preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy combined with radical surgery is recommended for locally advanced rectal cancer. Low rectal cancer accounts for about one third of all rectal cancer cases. Due to the particularity of its location，surgical complications and postoperative patients need permanent colostomy (artificial anus) to solve the defecation problems, which has a serious impact on the patients' work and life. How to improve the quality of life of patients without reducing the survival rate has become an important topic in the treatment of low rectal cancer. Previous studies have shown that the prognosis of patients with pathological complete remission (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer is optimistic. The clinical efficacy of "observation and waiting" is good. The results of small sample exploratory clinical studies of radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy for low rectal cancer are satisfactory, and MR-linear accelerator can be used for precision radiotherapy for colorectal cancer. This study is aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of radical radiotherapy boost for low rectal cancer by using magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy system, and further evaluate the impact of boost on the quality of life of patients.
The wide application of ISR and DST has greatly improved the anal preservation rate for low rectal cancers, but the technical difficulty has also been obviously increased because of the limited pelvic space. Although many scholars have tried to solve this problem, all the methods have failed to fundamentally solve the problem of "the oblique dissection" of the distal rectum. To solve the problem above, the director of this clinical trial has explored a new distal rectal resection method-- transanterior obturator nerve gateway approach. The purpose of this clinical trial is to prospectively collect and compare data on the patients' perioperative variables and postoperative functional and oncological outcomes of this novel approach with the traditional approach to confirm the safety and feasibility of this novel approach and its advantages over the traditional approach.
To explore the effect of general anesthesia combined with transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) and/or rectus sheath block (RSB) on the recovery of patients with gastrointestinal tumor after surgical treatment.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the addition of 2 cycles of induction CapOx chemotherapy and 2 cycles of consolidation CapOx chemotherapy to standard chemoradiation improves 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced CRM"+" mid and low rectal cancer.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether 3 months of neoadjuvant CapOx is non-inferior to neoadjuvant radiotherapy in patients with moderate risk CRM"-" mid rectal cancer.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether 4 cycles of neoadjuvant CapOx chemotherapy is more effective than the upfront surgery in patients with intermediate risk CRM"-" mid and upper rectal cancer.
The formation of a colostomy following surgery for rectal cancer changes body image, challenges patient practical skills and threatens quality of life. As the oncological results have improved over the last decades the number of survivors from rectal cancer who have to adjust to a cancer free life in their own homes is increasing. To enable the identification of the patients with stoma-related reduced health-related Quality of life (HRQoL) in a quick and reliable way we recently developed the Colostomy Impact Score (CI-score) comprising 7 items of stoma related factors with significant impact on HRQoL. The purpose of the present project is to perform an international validation of the CI-score and to demonstrate its applicability. The construct validity of the CI-score will be studied internationally on crosssectional cohorts of patients with permanent colostomy after abdominoperineal excision (APE) or Hartmann's procedure in Denmark, Sweden, Spain, the Netherlands, United Kingdom, Turkey, Brazil, Egypt, Russia, Lithuania, Israel, Portugal, South Africa, Australia and China. This will be done by testing the CI-score against five anchor questions stoma impact on HRQoL, the 5 Level version og the EuroQol measuer (EQ-5D-5L) and version 3.0 of the Quality of Life Questionnaire from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire v3.0). The impact of the challenges related to having a stoma may vary with different demographic, socioeconomic and cultural factors. Supplementary data on stoma care, demographics and socioeconomic status will be gathered to study the impact of patient-related factors and cultural differences on HRQoL in rectal cancer survivors with an ostomy.