View clinical trials related to Rectal Cancer.
Filter by:Behavioral Weight Loss for Overweight and Obese Cancer Survivors in Maryland: A Demonstration Project
The present study aimed to review the characteristics and outcome of early-onset rectal cancer in a subset of Egyptian patients aged 40 years or less. Since the previous studies assessed this point of research in CRC overall, the investigators opted to focus upon rectal cancer alone since it may represent a separate category, distinct from colon cancer, in this age group with regards to presentation, tumor behavior, and outcome.
To understand and analyse the global impact of COVID-19 on outpatient services, inpatient care, elective surgery, and perioperative colorectal cancer care, a DElayed COloRectal cancer surgery (DECOR-19) survey was conducted in collaboration with numerous international colorectal societies with the objective of obtaining several learning points from the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on our colorectal cancer patients which will assist us in the ongoing management of our colorectal cancer patients and to provide us safe oncological pathways for future outbreaks.
Malnutrition and loss of muscle mass frequently occur in patients undergoing chemotherapy and can negatively effect therapy outcome. Especially patients with cancer of the gastrointestinal tract are often affected by malnutrition. Therefore, this study aims to examine changes in nutritional status of patients with cancer of the gastrointestinal tract during chemotherapy. Findings of this study will help to improve nutritional treatment of patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Following colorectal surgery, many patients face a combination of physical and emotional problems for a long period of time. Symptoms such as pain, fatigue, and disturbed bowel and sexual function, as well as problems in social and role functioning, inevitably affect the patients' well-being. Therefore, evaluation of the self-reported quality of life (QoL) is becoming increasingly important in clinical trials. The investigators aimed to compare long term health related life quality (HRQoL) results of laparoscopic approach with open approach in patients with sphincter preserving resections for rectal cancer at a single-center.
TASOX can be safely and efficaciously delivered after short course radiation, resulting in significant pathologic downstaging, allowing for an R0 pelvic resection, and providing local control in appropriately selected stage II/III rectal cancer patients treated with contemporary TME-based surgery.
BACKGROUND and RATIONALE Colorectal cancer, with 49,000 new diagnoses expected in 2019 (27,000 in men and 22,000 in women) represents, in Italy, the third neoplasm in men (14%) and the second in women (12%). Increasing attention has been recently paid to the outcomes of surgical treatment, in terms of patient's anorectal function and quality of life (QoL). Currently, the majority of patients affected by rectal carcinoma undergo a sphincter-sparing surgery, that is, a low anterior rectal resection (LAR). It is known that about 50% - 90% of patients undergoing LAR will develop at least some degree of bowel dysfunction: for this reason, the definition of "anterior low rectal resection syndrome" (LARS) has been coined to describe this complex functional condition; the LARS usually includes incontinence to gas and/or liquid or solid stools, constipation, urgency, fragmentation and frequent bowel movements; a worsening of QoL has been also observed. Due to the importance and high prevalence of this condition, but in the absence of a reliable tool for assessing its severity, the so-called "LARS score" has been introduced. The score has already been validated in several languages, even if this important tool has not been validated in Italian language. AIMS of the STUDY The primary aim of this study will be the validation in Italian language of the LARS score in a population of Italian patients with a previous history of rectal cancer and treated by anterior rectal resection surgery. Moreover, the convergent and discriminatory validity, and the reliability of the score will be also assessed. STUDY DESIGN The study will be a prospective observational study on patients affected by rectal cancer and treated by anterior rectal resection surgery with total or partial excision of the mesorectum (TME, total mesorectal excision, or PME, partial mesorectal excision) in the period January 2000 - April 2018. Any Unit of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" - IRCCS of Rome that deals with rectal cancer surgery could join the study. METHODS The validated English version of the LARS questionnaire will be translated into Italian. The translation will be performed by two independent professional translators. Based on previous validation studies conducted in other Countries, it has been calculated that the sample size will be 200 patients. Patients will be assessed by administration of the LARS score questionnaire, of a single question on QoL, and of the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Each Unit could choose to assess the patients in the preferred way (clinical follow-up visit, e-mail, ordinary mail); however, the method of administration of the questionnaire must be specified in the final communication of data to the coordinating Group. Each Unit joining the Study will be provided with an Excel data collection sheet which must then be completed. A descriptive analysis of the data will be conducted, and the convergent validity, that is the concordance between the LARS score and the QoL, will be investigated. In addition, discriminatory validity, i.e. the ability of the LARS score to distinguish between subgroups of patients, which usually differ in the LARS score, will be assessed. Finally, the test-retest reliability of the LARS score will be examined, so all patients will receive a second LARS questionnaire 1-2 weeks after completing the first and the results of the two tests will be compared.
This study is being conducted to evaluate the incidence and type of surgical complications occurring in patients who have a defunctioning stoma after LARfor rectal cancer. The data from this retrospective study will be analyzed by the study Sponsor to aid in designing a prospective clinical trial for a new technology that offers a treatment alternative to standard of care defunctioning stoma in patients undergoing LAR for rectal cancer.
The type of preventive intestinal stoma (colostomy/ileostomy) after low anterior rectal resection rectum is still a debate. This study purpose is to demonstrate that preventive loop ileostomy is characterized by a higher readmission rate caused by dehydration, in comparison with the loop colostomy.
Abdominoperineal resection leaves an empty space to be filled by mesh or musculocutaneus flap. Several studies have reported over 30% morbidity with perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection. Preoperative radiotherapy is a strong predictor for perineal complications. Musculocutaneus flaps and use of biological mesh seem to minimize perineal morbidity. The role of omentoplasty at APR is controversial. Previous studies on synthetic mesh repair on perineum are almost lacking.