View clinical trials related to Rectal Cancer.
Filter by:The investigators' null hypothesis is that a withdrawal time of 9 to 10 minutes is non-inferior to a withdrawal time of 12 minutes or greater. Thus, the goal of this tandem design trial is to compare the additional diagnostic yield (# of missed lesions) for withdrawal times exceeding 10 minutes for screening/surveillance colonoscopies. Although withdrawal times longer than the standard 6-minute recommendation have been shown to be beneficial, there is limited prospective evidence investigating the benefit or lack thereof for withdrawal times greater than 9-10 minutes.
A randomized trial to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Colovac in providing temporary protection of the anastomosis in subjects undergoing lower anterior resection for colorectal cancer.
This is an open-label multicenter controlled trial, including 28 centers from the Rete Oncologica (Oncological Network) of Piemonte and Valle d'Aosta in Italy (http://www.reteoncologica.it). After a curative resection for rectal cancer and temporary ileostomy, 270 patients with indication to adjuvant chemotherapy will be randomized to early (before starting adjuvant treatment) or late (after adjuvant treatment completion) stoma closure. Primary end point will the compliance to adjuvant therapy. Secondary endpoint will include quality of life and bowel function evaluation, postoperative morbidity, chemotherapy toxicity, oncological outcomes and costs comparison.
The goal of pilot study is to assess the feasibility of FDG-PET/MRI for monitoring rectal cancer disease status in the setting of rectal cancer non-operative management (NOM). Data from this study will be used to guide the design of future clinical trials involving FDG-PET/MRI for rectal cancer NOM.
This phase II, randomized pilot trial studies the effect of the consumption of foods made with resistant starch compared to foods made with corn starch on biomarkers that may be related to colorectal cancer progression in stage I-III colorectal cancer survivors. Foods made with resistant starch may beneficially influence markers of inflammation, insulin resistance, and the composition of gut bacteria in colorectal cancer survivors.
In initially metastatic rectal carcinoma, a neo-adjuvant multi-drug chemotherapy is usually performed, followed by a pelvic chemoradiation. The surgical indications on both metastases and the pelvic site are then discussed: in the case where a complete (or near-complete) response (CR) of the rectal tumor is observed (10 to 40%), the local surgery may be omitted or poned ("wait-and-see") in a sphincter-sparing strategy, in order to minimize or avoid the surgical morbidity, to focus on metastatic disease by the continuation of chemotherapy, and to preserve a better quality of life. After 8 weeks of induction chemotherapy (mFolfox6 regimen, 4 cycles), the aim of our study is to optimize the chemoradiation step on the distal rectal tumor, thanks to Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) (Phase-1 part of the study), concomitantly with oral capecitabine. According to a Fibonacci dose-escalation scheme, 3 radiation dose-levels are defined, up to the definition of the maximal tolerated dose (MTD), requiring the inclusion of a maximum of 20 patients. Further patients will be included at the recommended dose for phase-2 (RDP2) in a two-step phase-2 study, considering simultaneously as principal objective at 12 months, both the efficacy (local CR rate in the range of 10 to 25%) and the tolerance (pelvic radiation disease: grade 3-4 toxicities in the range of 30 to 10%). Overall 65 patients will be included in the phase-2 study at the RDP2 dose.
The goal is to evaluate whether the renunciation of a diverting stoma in patients with adjuvant chemotherapy after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy leads to a better quality of life without increasing morbidity and mortality in patients with rectal cancer.
Among patients treated for locally advanced rectal cancer with neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy, about 15% will have complete clinical response in terms of no visible tumor or ulcerations on the site of the primary tumor, or whitening of the rectal wall or telangiectasia. In this Norwegian national multicenter observational study, patients with complete clinical response (cCR) after neo-adjuvant treatment for rectal cancer as defined by national guidelines, will be invited to a Watch&Wait program with a specially designed follow-up in order to see if the tumor has disappeared permanently, or if there is regrowth of the tumor. Primary endpoint is the true regrowth rate in an unselected national cohort of patients.
For advanced rectal tumors, the standard of care is neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) +/- chemotherapy followed by surgery 8-10 weeks later. Despite its proven efficacy in reducing local relapse, the neo-adjuvant treatment has been associated to non-negligible side effects, especially in terms of impaired sexual function. For females, pelvic RT is frequently associated to long-term complications such as vaginal stenosis (VS), vaginal dryness, and dyspareunia, while in men RT doses delivered to the neurovascular peri-prostatic bundles and penile bulb have been associated to the risk to develop erectile dysfunction. In prostate cancer, hydrogel spacers have been evaluated to create space between the target (prostate) and the organ (rectum) to be spared during radiotherapy treatments. Clinical studies have shown the ease of spacer application; patient tolerance and, good clinical outcomes (decrease in rectal toxicities). This pilot study wishes to investigate feasibility and efficacy of the injected hydrogel spacers TraceIT® in sparing vagina/prostate in the treatment of rectal cancer patients.
This is an open-label feasibility study utilising direct instillation of ICG into the urethra during surgery for low rectal cancers. The trial involves a single intervention taking place during the patient's operation. Participants will be included in the study for around 2 months with time either side of the intervention to collect background data.