Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05150990
Other study ID # NIH 13336607
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date October 12, 2021
Est. completion date March 16, 2024

Study information

Verified date March 2024
Source University of California, Santa Barbara
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this project is to test the impact of different forms of technology (virtual reality vs. video chat) on quality of life and family relationships in older adults who reside in senior living communities and an adult child who lives at a distance. The study will also investigate whether responses to the technology and quality of life outcomes depend on older adults' level of cognitive impairment.


Description:

Purpose of the clinical trial: The virtual reality (VR) program, Rendever, enables older adults in senior living communities to maintain important family relationships, engage fully with life, and reconnect with their past, regardless of physical location, through its advanced networking and live-streaming capabilities. This project will test the immediate and longer-term impact of the Rendever virtual reality platform (vs. video chat) on the quality of life of residents and their adult children in an experimental design. The study will also investigate whether responses to the technology and quality of life outcomes depend on older adults' level of cognitive impairment. Participants: Participants will be older adults (age 50+) with mild cognitive impairments (MCI) or mild to moderate Alzheimer's Disease or related dementias (AD/ADRD) who reside in senior living communities, and an adult child who lives at a distance. The resident-adult child dyads (N=192 dyads) will be recruited from 12 senior living communities in the greater Boston area and central California. Residents will participate from their senior living community and adult children will participate from their own home, at least 45 minutes driving distance away. Study Design and Method: The design is a 2 (Intervention Group: Virtual Reality vs. Active Control) x 2 (Level of Cognitive Impairment: MCI vs. AD/ADRD) x Time (7 time points) design. Dyads will be randomly assigned to an intervention group (Virtual Reality vs. Video Chat Control). Dependent variables will include positive engagement while using the technology, quality of life, psychological and social well-being (loneliness, mental health, thriving, and relationship quality), and caregiver guilt (guilt, stress, and burden) assessed through surveys, interviews, and observational methods. The experimental intervention will be implemented in a between-group design. Dyads will be randomly assigned to either the Virtual Reality Condition or the active Control Condition (video chat). Participants will complete a baseline survey (T1), followed by four activity sessions once a week for 4 consecutive weeks (T2-T5). Follow-up surveys will be conducted at 1-month (T6) and 3-months (T7) post-intervention. Residents and adult children will also be interviewed briefly after the intervention and at the each follow-up. All sessions will be video and audiotaped. Computerized and human coding will examine positive engagement and interpersonal dynamics while using the technology. Dyads assigned to the virtual reality (VR) condition will engage in 4 weekly VR sessions that include immersive virtual adventures (e.g., bucket list travel) and reminiscence activities (e.g., virtual life story). Dyads assigned to the control condition will engage in 4 weekly video chat sessions. During these sessions, dyads will engage in conversations that are typical in their daily lives. All other procedures will be identical in the two conditions. Sample size, recruitment, and statistical power: A power analysis using simulation methods (for multi-level regression models and structural equation models) was used to determine the sample size. A sample size of 192 dyads (96 in each intervention condition) evenly split between cognitive impairment groups (MCI vs. dementia) will achieve a high level of power for detecting the minimal expected effect size. Additional dyads will be recruited to account for attrition. Statistical analysis: Because data from parent-adult child dyads will be dependent, and because the dyad is the unit of analysis for assignment to experimental conditions, the analysis of quantitative data will utilize linear models designed for nested (clustered) data. Hypothesis testing will be conducted with multi-level, random-effects regression and multi-level structural equation modeling. Study Aims: AIM 1: Determine whether virtual reality (vs. control) improves quality of life for residents and their adult children who live at a distance. AIM 2: Determine whether the positive effects of virtual reality (vs. control) on quality of life depend upon residents' level of cognitive impairment (MCI vs. mild to moderate AD/ADRD). AIM 3: Determine whether virtual reality (vs. control) reduces caregiver guilt for adult children and whether these effects depend on the adult child's own responses to the technology and their parent's responses to the technology.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 372
Est. completion date March 16, 2024
Est. primary completion date December 16, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria for older adults: - must reside in one of the senior living communities participating in the study - at least 50 years old - fluent in English or Spanish - have MCI or mild to moderate AD/ADRD - mini-mental state examination (MMSE-2) score between 13 and 27 - have an adult child who lives at least 45 minutes driving distance from the community and is willing to participate with them - do not have an overly negative, aggressive, or abusive relationship with this adult child Inclusion Criteria for adult children: - at least 18 years old - fluent in English or Spanish, - live at least 45 minutes driving distance from the residential community - do not have an overly negative, aggressive, or abusive relationship with their parent Exclusion Criteria: - severe AD/ADRD - history of severe vertigo, hallucinations, or aggression - severe visual impairment (screening will be conducted to determine if vision is sufficient to participate)

Study Design


Intervention

Behavioral:
Virtual Reality
Older adults (residents of senior living communities) will engage in four 20-minute virtual reality activities (via the Rendever platform) with their adult child each week for 4 consecutive weeks. The 4 sessions will include immersive virtual adventures (e.g., bucket list travel) and reminiscence activities (e.g., virtual life story). Adult children will be participating remotely from their own homes.
Video Chat
Older adults (residents of senior living communities) will engage in four 20-minute video chat sessions (via the Zoom platform) with their adult child each week for 4 consecutive weeks. Adult children will be participating remotely from their own homes.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Stone Hill at Andover Andover Massachusetts
United States Stonebridge at Burlington Burlington Massachusetts
United States Belmont Calabasas Calabasas California
United States Oakmont of Camarillo Camarillo California
United States Cadbury Commons Cambridge Massachusetts
United States Youville House Assisted Living Cambridge Massachusetts
United States Brightview Canton Canton Massachusetts
United States The Linden at Danvers Danvers Massachusetts
United States Friendship Manor Goleta California
United States Ledgewood Bay Assisted Living Milford New Hampshire
United States Casa Dorinda Montecito California
United States Brightview North Andover North Andover Massachusetts
United States Benchmark of Norwood (Clapboardtree) Norwood Massachusetts
United States Ojai Gables Ojai California
United States Laurelwood at The Pinehills Plymouth Massachusetts
United States Covenant Living at the Samarkand Santa Barbara California
United States Garden Court on De La Vina Santa Barbara California
United States Gardens on Hope Santa Barbara California
United States Grace Village Apartments Santa Barbara California
United States Heritage House Santa Barbara California
United States Maravilla Santa Barbara California
United States Valle Verde Santa Barbara California
United States Vista Del Monte Santa Barbara California
United States Atterdag Village of Solvang Solvang California
United States Autumn Glen at Dartmouth South Dartmouth Massachusetts
United States Bayberry at Emerald Court Tewksbury Massachusetts
United States Carriage House at Lee's Farm Wayland Massachusetts

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of California, Santa Barbara Rendever, Inc.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QOL-AD) - changes from Baseline QOL-AD (R.G. Logsdon, 1996) is a 13-item self-report measure of quality of life (completed by older adult and adult child informant, who reports on parent's quality of life). Items are rated on a 4-point scale: Poor = 1, Fair = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4. Total score is the sum of all items (range: 13 to 54). Higher scores indicate greater quality of life. Baseline (1-week Pre-intervention), 1-week Post-intervention, 1-month Post-intervention, 3-months post-intervention
Primary Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) - changes from Baseline GDS (Sheikh, J.I., & Yesavage, J.A., 1986) is a 15-item self-report measure of depression (completed by older adult). Items are rated "Yes" or "No" and are scored "1" if the response reflects depressive symptoms. Total score is the sum of all items (range: 0 to 15). Higher scores indicate greater depression. Baseline (1-week Pre-intervention), 1-week Post-intervention, 1-month Post-intervention, 3-months post-intervention
Primary Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (short form) - changes from Baseline The short form of the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (Hughes, Waite, Hawkley, & Cacioppo, 2008) is a 4-item scale widely used in field research with older adults, and adapted from the original scale (Russell D, Peplau LA, Cutrona CE, 1980). (Completed by the older adult and the adult child.) Items are rated on a 4-point scale: 1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often. Total score is the sum of the 4 items (range: 4 to 16). Higher scores indicate greater loneliness. Baseline (1-week Pre-intervention), 1-week Post-intervention, 1-month Post-intervention, 3-months post-intervention
Primary Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT) - changes from Baseline BIT (Su, R., Tay, L., & Diener, E., 2014) is a 10-item self-report measure of thriving (completed by the older adult and adult child). Items are rated on a 5-point scale: 1= Strongly Disagree, 2=Disagree, 3 = Neither Agree nor Disagree, 4 = Agree, 5=Strongly Agree. Total score is the average of the 10 items (range: 1 to 5). Higher scores indicate greater sense of thriving. Baseline (1-week Pre-intervention), 1-week Post-intervention, 1-month Post-intervention, 3-months post-intervention
Primary Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) - changes from Baseline The PSS short form (completed by older adult and adult child) is a 4-item scale adapted from the longer PSS (Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein, 1983). Items are rated on a 5-point scale: 1=Never, 2=Almost never, 3=Sometimes, 4=Fairly often, 5=Very often. Total score is the average of the 4 items, some reverse-scored (range: 1 to 5). Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress. Baseline (1-week Pre-intervention), 1-week Post-intervention, 1-month Post-intervention, 3-months post-intervention
Primary Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) - changes from Baseline This scale includes 17-items from the longer PANAS (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen (1988). (Completed by the older adult and adult child.) Participants rate the degree to which they experienced positive and negative emotions during the past week. Items are rated on a 5-point scale: 1=Not at all, 2=A little, 3=Moderately, 4=Quite a lot, 5=Extremely. Separate scores are computed for positive and negative emotion. Higher scores indicate greater positive/negative affect. Baseline (1-week Pre-intervention), 1-week Post-intervention, 1-month Post-intervention, 3-months post-intervention
Primary Mental Health Inventory (MHI) - changes from Baseline The MHI includes 8 items from the longer MHI (McHorney, Ware, & Raczek, 1993) to assess depression, anxiety, and vitality during the past week (completed by the older adult and adult child). Items are rated on a 5-point scale: 1= None of the time, 2= A little of the time, 3=some of the time, 4=most of the time, 5= All of the time. Total score is the average of all 8 items, some reverse-scored (range: 1 to 5). Higher scores indicate better mental health. Baseline (1-week Pre-intervention), 1-week Post-intervention, 1-month Post-intervention, 3-months post-intervention
Primary Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale Revised Short Form (CESD-R-10) - changes from Baseline CESD-R-10 (Björgvinsson, Kertz, Bigda-Peyton, McCoy, Aderka,2013) is a 10-item measure of depressive symptoms adapted from the longer CESD (completed by the adult child). Items are rated on a 4-point scale: 0=Rarely or none of the time, 1=Some or a little of the time, 2=Occasionally or a moderate amount of the time, 3=All of the time. Total score is the sum of the 10 items, some reverse-scored (range: 0 to 30). Baseline (1-week Pre-intervention), 1-week Post-intervention, 1-month Post-intervention, 3-months post-intervention
Primary Caregiver Guilt and Grief Scale - changes from Baseline This scale (completed by the adult child) includes 13-items adapted from the caregiver guilt and grief scales (Wells, Jorm, Jordan, & Lefroy, 1990). Items are rated on a 5-point scale: 1= Not at all, 2=A little, 3=A moderate amount, 4=A lot, 5=Almost unbearably. Total score is the average of the 13 items (range: 1 to 5). Higher scores indicate greater caregiver guilt/grief. Baseline (1-week Pre-intervention), 1-week Post-intervention, 1-month Post-intervention, 3-months post-intervention
Primary Relational Burnout/Load Scale - changes from Baseline Relational burnout/load is assessed with 5 items from the Relational Load Scale (Afifi et al., 2019). (Completed by the adult child.) Items are rated on a 5-point scale: 1=Strongly disagree 2=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=Agree, 5=Strongly agree. Total score is the average of the 6 items, some reverse-scored (range: 1 to 5). Higher scores indicate greater sense of relational load/burnout. Baseline (1-week Pre-intervention), 1-week Post-intervention, 1-month Post-intervention, 3-months post-intervention
Primary Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale - changes from Baseline Relationship closeness is assessed with 4-items from the Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale (Dibble, Levine, & Park, 2011). (Completed by the older adult and adult child). Items are rated on a 7-point scale: 1=Strongly disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Somewhat disagree, 4=Neutral, 5=Somewhat agree, 6=Agree, 7=Strong Agree. Total score is the average of the 4 items (range: 1 to 7). Higher scores indicated greater relationship closeness. Baseline (1-week Pre-intervention), 1-week Post-intervention, 1-month Post-intervention, 3-months post-intervention
Primary Communal Coping - changes from Baseline Communal coping is assessed with 3 items assessing feelings of unity when combatting stress (Afifi et al., 2019). Items are rated on a 5-point scale: 1=Strongly disagree 2=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=Agree, 5=Strongly agree. Total score is the average of the 3 items. Higher scores indicate greater sense of communal coping. Baseline (1-week Pre-intervention), 1-week Post-intervention, 1-month Post-intervention, 3-months post-intervention
Primary Relationship satisfaction - changes from Baseline Global relationship satisfaction is assessed with 3 items adapted from Huston et al.'s (1986) relationship satisfaction scale (completed by the older adult and adult child). Items are rated on a 6-point scale: 1=not at all, 2=A little, 3=Somewhat, 4=Very, 5= Almost completely, 6=Completely. Total scores are the average of the 3 items (rage: 1 to 6). Higher scores indicate greater relationship satisfaction. Baseline (1-week Pre-intervention), 1-week Post-intervention, 1-month Post-intervention, 3-months post-intervention
Secondary Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Positive and negative emotions experienced during the technology session (older adult and adult child). Rated on a scale from 1 to 5, and separate indexes are computed for positive emotion and negative emotion. Higher scores represent greater positive and negative emotion. Scores will be averaged across the intervention period (4 weeks) for overall measures of positive/negative affect experienced during the intervention. Immediately after each of the 4 technology sessions during the intervention (one week apart)
Secondary Social and Conversational Engagement Rating of social engagement during the technology session (older adult and adult child). Items written for this study based on the funded pilot study. Higher scores represent greater engagement. Scores will be averaged across the intervention period (4 weeks) for an overall score of engagement during the intervention. Immediately after each of the 4 technology sessions during the intervention (one week apart)
Secondary Relationship satisfaction and Communication Quality Multiple items designed to assess features of relationship quality (older adult and adult child). Higher scores represent greater satisfaction and communication quality. Scores will be averaged across the intervention period (4 weeks) for an overall score of relationship satisfaction and communication quality during the technology sessions, during the intervention period. Immediately after each of the 4 technology sessions during the intervention (one week apart)
Secondary Telepresence and Copresence Rating of engagement and immersion during the technology session (older adult and adult child). Items written for this study based on the funded pilot study. Higher scores represent greater telepresence and co-presence. Scores will be averaged across the intervention period (4 weeks) for an overall score of telepresence and copresence experienced during the technology sessions. Immediately after each of the 4 technology sessions during the intervention (one week apart)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT05559255 - Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI N/A
Completed NCT06238557 - Prospective Evaluation of Psychological Consequences and Impact on Long-term Quality of Life
Recruiting NCT05563805 - Exploring Virtual Reality Adventure Training Exergaming N/A
Completed NCT05472935 - Asynchronous Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction to Reduce Burnout in Licensed Clinical Social Workers N/A
Recruiting NCT04444544 - Quality of Life and High-Risk Abdominal Cancer Surgery
Completed NCT04281953 - Impact on Quality of Life of Long-term Ototoxicity in Cancer Survivors
Active, not recruiting NCT04746664 - Effects of Nutrition Counselling on Old Age People's Nutritional Status and Quality of Life in Bahir Dar City, North West Ethiopia N/A
Completed NCT05387174 - Nursing Intervention in Two Risk Factors of the Metabolic Syndrome and Quality of Life in the Climacteric Period N/A
Recruiting NCT04142827 - The Effect of Long Term Therapy With High Flow Humidification Compared to Usual Care in Patients With Bronchiectasis (BX) N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05903638 - A Pilot RCT: the Impact of a Virtual MBSR Course on Women With Primary Infertility N/A
Completed NCT05538455 - Investigating ProCare4Life Impact on Quality of Life of Elderly Subjects With Neurodegenerative Diseases N/A
Completed NCT06216015 - Exercise Training and Kidney Transplantation N/A
Completed NCT03813420 - Sleep Quality of Physiotherapy Students Quality of Life and Physical Activity Level N/A
Recruiting NCT05550545 - Infant RSV Infections and Health-related Quality of Life of Families
Completed NCT05346588 - THRIVE Feasibility Trial Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05233020 - Robotic Versus Hybrid Assisted Ventral Hernia Repair N/A
Terminated NCT03304184 - The Role of Biodentine in Class V Dental Lesions on Oral Health Related Quality of Life Phase 3
Completed NCT05063305 - Probiotics, Immunity, Stress, and QofL N/A
Recruiting NCT05380856 - Sacral Neuromodulation for Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract, Bowel and Sexual Dysfunction N/A
Completed NCT05934578 - Lymphatic Function in Patients With Fontan Circulation: Effect of Physical Training N/A