Efficacy of Two Local Anesthetics on Quality of Life After Endodontic Treatment

Quality of Life Clinical Trial

— B-OHIP14  

Official title:

Efficacy of Two Dental Local Anesthetics on the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life After Endodontic Treatment in the Symptomatic Mandibular Molars: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Suspended

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04787731
• Other study ID #: s19-00069
• Status: Suspended
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: July 29, 2019
• Est. completion date: October 1, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: November 2023
• Source: NYU College of Dentistry
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

In this randomized controlled double-blinded study, subjects will be assigned to one of two study groups to either be anesthetized with Bupivacaine or Lidocaine prior to needed treatment of pulpectomy/endodontic debridement on a symptomatic tooth. Subjects' oral health related quality of life and postoperative pain resolution, pain medication use and numbness will be compared in two study groups.

Description:

This is a double-blind randomized controlled single-site trial. We aim to recruit 100 subject, with an anticipated dropout rate of 20%; our goal is to enroll 40 subjects in each study arm based on the power analysis described in data analysis section as well as general feasibility for recruitment, and the ability to complete the study in within one year. After screening for eligibility based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria listed below, and after preoperative data collection, in the experimental arm, inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) will be administered 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine whereas in the control arm, IANB will be administered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for a standardized pulpectomy/endodontic debridement treatment as the 1st visit endodontic treatment for subjects with preoperative pain. Postoperative oral health related quality of life questionnaire (OHIP-14) responses at day 1 and 5 as well as 5-day postoperative pain intensity questionnaire will be collected remotely. In this way, we will be able to compare OHQoL change as well as postoperative pain resolution, pain medication use and postoperative soft tissue anesthesia reported by the patient in two study arms.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Suspended
• Enrollment: 100
• Est. completion date: October 1, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: October 1, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 85 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients between the ages of 18-85 years
• Patients with pulpal diagnosis of either symptomatic irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis and periapical diagnosis of normal apical tissues, symptomatic apical periodontitis or asymptomatic apical periodontitis.
• Patients who only have one tooth with odontogenic pain at the time point of the screening.
• Patients who are treatment planned, and have agreed to have, pulpectomy/endodontic debridement.
• Patients with acute dental pain of at least 3/10 on NRS
• Patients must be able to comprehend and complete all study questionnaires
• Patients must be able to comprehend the description of the study protocol and written consent Patients must be able to be contacted by text messages, phone calls or email during 5 days after pulpectomy/endodontic debridement

Exclusion Criteria:

• Medically complex patients with severe systemic diseases (ASA III or above). These may include uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled blood pressure and/or chronic renal failure, for example, and potential participants will be asked about these conditions during the screening process.
• Pregnant Patients
• Patients who have already been enrolled in the study. Patients can only be enrolled for treatment on one tooth.
• Patients with known hypersensitivity or allergy to any local anesthetic agent of the amide group, or any other components of the two anesthetic solutions such as epinephrine, sodium metabisulfite used in the study.
• Patients who use ergot-type oxytocic drugs for uterine contraction, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, antidepressant of triptyline or imipramine types or patients who are planned to receive sedatives for the treatment.
• Patients with additional elective dental treatments like extraction, implant placement, root canal therapy planned in the 5 days following the date of enrollment in this study
• Patients with pain whose examined tooth is planned for vital pulp therapies e.g. pulpotomy, retreatment, apical surgery or extraction
• Patients with a pulpal diagnosis or reversible pulpitis, previously treated, previously initiated therapy and periapical diagnosis of acute apical abscess or chronic apical abscess.
• Patients who have multiple teeth with odontogenic pain at the time of the screening
• Patients who do not understand or are able to read the questionnaires
• Non-English speaking patients

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Pain, Postoperative
• Quality of Life

Intervention

Drug:
• Bupivacaine Local Anesthetic
Long lasting local anesthetic administered to be compared to Lidocaine for quality of life outcomes in dental patients undergoing endodontic treatment

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	NYU College of Dentistry	New York	New York

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
NYU College of Dentistry

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (27)

Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S. Comparative Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy of 2% Lidocaine, 4% Articaine, and 0.5% Bupivacaine on Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2017 Spring;31(2):124-128. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1642. — View Citation

Arias A, de la Macorra JC, Hidalgo JJ, Azabal M. Predictive models of pain following root canal treatment: a prospective clinical study. Int Endod J. 2013 Aug;46(8):784-93. doi: 10.1111/iej.12059. Epub 2013 Feb 12. — View Citation

Balocco AL, Van Zundert PGE, Gan SS, Gan TJ, Hadzic A. Extended release bupivacaine formulations for postoperative analgesia: an update. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):636-642. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000648. — View Citation

Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T, Carter T, Cassidy CL, Chittenden EH, Degenhardt E, Griffith S, Manworren R, McCarberg B, Montgomery R, Murphy J, Perkal MF, Suresh S, Sluka K, Strassels S, Thirlby R, Viscusi E, Walco GA, Warner L, Weisman SJ, Wu CL. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):131-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008. Erratum In: J Pain. 2016 Apr;17(4):508-10. Dosage error in article text. — View Citation

Fernandez C, Reader A, Beck M, Nusstein J. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks. J Endod. 2005 Jul;31(7):499-503. doi: 10.1097/01.don.0000167395.61075.38. — View Citation

Gordon SM, Mischenko AV, Dionne RA. Long-acting local anesthetics and perioperative pain management. Dent Clin North Am. 2010 Oct;54(4):611-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2010.06.002. — View Citation

Hamasha AA, Hatiwsh A. Quality of life and satisfaction of patients after nonsurgical primary root canal treatment provided by undergraduate students, graduate students and endodontic specialists. Int Endod J. 2013 Dec;46(12):1131-9. doi: 10.1111/iej.12106. Epub 2013 Apr 6. — View Citation

Hargreaves KM, Berman L. H. Cohen's Pathways of the Pulp. Missouri:Elsevier;2016

Joseph P. Crowley CoADA. ADA wants Federal agencies to address Best Practices for managing acute pain. In: Vanilla M. Singh PMBPI-ATF, editor.: American Dental; Association; 2018.

Khan AA, Owatz CB, Schindler WG, Schwartz SA, Keiser K, Hargreaves KM. Measurement of mechanical allodynia and local anesthetic efficacy in patients with irreversible pulpitis and acute periradicular periodontitis. J Endod. 2007 Jul;33(7):796-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.01.021. Epub 2007 Mar 26. — View Citation

Law AS, Nixdorf DR, Aguirre AM, Reams GJ, Tortomasi AJ, Manne BD, Harris DR; National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group. Predicting severe pain after root canal therapy in the National Dental PBRN. J Dent Res. 2015 Mar;94(3 Suppl):37S-43S. doi: 10.1177/0022034514555144. Epub 2014 Oct 29. — View Citation

Menhinick KA, Gutmann JL, Regan JD, Taylor SE, Buschang PH. The efficacy of pain control following nonsurgical root canal treatment using ibuprofen or a combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Int Endod J. 2004 Aug;37(8):531-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00836.x. — View Citation

Montero J, Lorenzo B, Barrios R, Albaladejo A, Miron Canelo JA, Lopez-Valverde A. Patient-centered Outcomes of Root Canal Treatment: A Cohort Follow-up Study. J Endod. 2015 Sep;41(9):1456-61. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jul 26. — View Citation

Moradi S, Naghavi N. Comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine use for postoperative pain control in endodontics. Iran Endod J. 2010 Winter;5(1):31-5. Epub 2010 Feb 20. — View Citation

Olmedo-Gaya MV, Manzano-Moreno FJ, Munoz-Lopez JL, Vallecillo-Capilla MF, Reyes-Botella C. Double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial on analgesic efficacy of local anesthetics articaine and bupivacaine after impacted third molar extraction. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Dec;22(9):2981-2988. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2386-1. Epub 2018 Feb 15. — View Citation

Owatz CB, Khan AA, Schindler WG, Schwartz SA, Keiser K, Hargreaves KM. The incidence of mechanical allodynia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 2007 May;33(5):552-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.01.023. Epub 2007 Mar 6. — View Citation

Pak JG, White SN. Pain prevalence and severity before, during, and after root canal treatment: a systematic review. J Endod. 2011 Apr;37(4):429-38. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.12.016. — View Citation

Parirokh M, Yosefi MH, Nakhaee N, Abbott PV, Manochehrifar H. The success rate of bupivacaine and lidocaine as anesthetic agents in inferior alveolar nerve block in teeth with irreversible pulpitis without spontaneous pain. Restor Dent Endod. 2015 May;40(2):155-60. doi: 10.5395/rde.2015.40.2.155. Epub 2015 Mar 16. — View Citation

Parirokh M, Yosefi MH, Nakhaee N, Manochehrifar H, Abbott PV, Reza Forghani F. Effect of bupivacaine on postoperative pain for inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia after single-visit root canal treatment in teeth with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 2012 Aug;38(8):1035-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.04.012. Epub 2012 May 30. — View Citation

Rechenberg DK, Held U, Burgstaller JM, Bosch G, Attin T. Pain levels and typical symptoms of acute endodontic infections: a prospective, observational study. BMC Oral Health. 2016 May 27;16(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12903-016-0222-z. — View Citation

Sampaio RM, Carnaval TG, Lanfredi CB, Horliana AC, Rocha RG, Tortamano IP. Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy between bupivacaine and lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molar. J Endod. 2012 May;38(5):594-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.01.008. Epub 2012 Feb 4. — View Citation

Shahi S, Rahimi S, Yavari HR, Ghasemi N, Ahmadi F. Success Rate of 3 Injection Methods with Articaine for Mandibular First Molars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A CONSORT Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial. J Endod. 2018 Oct;44(10):1462-1466. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Aug 31. — View Citation

Shamszadeh S, Shirvani A, Eghbal MJ, Asgary S. Efficacy of Corticosteroids on Postoperative Endodontic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Endod. 2018 Jul;44(7):1057-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.03.010. Epub 2018 Apr 30. — View Citation

Shapiro MR, McDonald NJ, Gardner RJ, Peters MC, Botero TM. Efficacy of Articaine versus Lidocaine in Supplemental Infiltration for Mandibular First versus Second Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial. J Endod. 2018 Apr;44(4):523-528. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.10.003. Epub 2018 Feb 1. — View Citation

Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;25(4):284-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x. — View Citation

St George G, Morgan A, Meechan J, Moles DR, Needleman I, Ng YL, Petrie A. Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 10;7(7):CD006487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006487.pub2. — View Citation

Su N, Wang H, Zhang S, Liao S, Yang S, Huang Y. Efficacy and safety of bupivacaine versus lidocaine in dental treatments: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int Dent J. 2014 Feb;64(1):34-45. doi: 10.1111/idj.12060. Epub 2013 Oct 11. — View Citation

* Note: There are 27 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Effects of Bupivacaine/Lidocaine will be assessed on post-operative pain intensity, medication use and length of numbness compared between the two study groups using Oral Health Related Quality-of-Life (OHQoL) questionnaire and Visual Analog Scale (VAS).	The OHQoL questionnaire contains 14 questions and scores can range from 0 to 56. Pain intensity is measured by VAS scale and scores can range from 0-10. Higher scores represent worse outcomes for both assessments.	4 weeks +-10 days