Quality of Life in Kidney Stone Patients Undergoing Surgery

Quality of Life Clinical Trial

Official title:

Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Ureteroscopic to Percutaneous Removal for the 1-2 cm Calculus Measuring Quality of Life as the Primary Outcome

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02625051
• Other study ID #: CHR15-17595
• Secondary ID: P20DK100863
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: July 2016
• Est. completion date: June 30, 2019

Study information

• Verified date: July 2021
• Source: University of California, San Francisco
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a prospective randomized study, comparing quality of life in renal stone patients undergoing surgical treatment with ureteroscopy (URS) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL).

Description:

In United States, the prevalence of renal stone is 8.8% with slight predomination in male than female. They can be symptomatic marked by symptoms of flank pain, hematuria or urinary tract infection, or completely asymptomatic and incidentally discovered. Three modalities are accepted as treatment options for renal stone, including shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and ureteroscopy (URS). While some standard guidelines were proposed for appropriate treatment selection with regard to stone size, no recommendations or guidelines exist for the surgical management of 1-2 cm renal stones. Both PNL and URS are equally accepted as treatment options for stones at this size. The selection of either procedure currently is left to the treating surgeon can be influenced by anatomical or stone factors as well as patient preference. For URS, frequent requirement for postoperative ureteral stents may result in significant morbidity and a detriment to quality of life owing to irritating bladder symptoms caused by the stent itself. PNL rarely requires postoperative ureteral stent but it may bring longer operative time and hospitalization. PNL therefore may be a treatment option that preserves quality of life compared to URS for patients presenting with the 1-2 cm sized kidney or ureteral stone.

One reasonable way to evaluate efficacy of treatment options is to assess patient's quality of life resultant from the selected modality. Quality of life for renal stone formers is an important but under-studied facet of nephrolithiasis management that should be incorporated into clinical decision making.

The short form-36 health survey questionnaire (SF-36) is a patient-reported survey of health status. It has been validated and is commonly used to determine the efficacy of a given health treatment in many settings, including urologic intervention. The Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) is a validated and widely accepted instrument to evaluate the impact of ureteral stents on quality of life. The investigators plan to use these two questionnaires as a standard outcome measurement to compare impact on quality of life in patients randomized to undergo two different modalities (PNL versus URS) of stone treatment.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 30
• Est. completion date: June 30, 2019
• Est. primary completion date: June 30, 2019
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patient with a renal or proximal ureteral stone measuring 1-2 cm in size on preoperative ultrasound, computed tomography, or plain radiographic imaging

Exclusion Criteria:

• Serious illness likely to cause death within the next 5 years, so as to exclude significant metabolic derangements that might lead to adverse surgical outcome.

• Stones with measured size larger than 2 cm or smaller than 1 cm.

• Patients with ureteral or renal anatomy or stones located in a position judged to be unsafe for randomization.

• Pregnancy.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Calculi
• Kidney Calculi
• Nephrolithiasis
• Quality of Life

Intervention

Procedure:
• Ureteroscopy
Under general anesthesia, the patient is placed in the lithotomy position. All procedures are performed under direct videoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance. Fluoroscopic screening is utilized using a mobile multidirectional C-arm fluoroscopy unit. A safety guide-wire is then placed into renal pelvis, followed by a ureteral access sheath to maintain low intra-renal pressure, and to facilitate the procedures. Using flexible ureteroscope, renal or proximal ureteral stone is identified and fragmented with a holmium laser. Basket extraction of residual fragments is done until visual complete clearance of stone fragments is achieved.
• Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Under general anesthesia, an open-ended 5 french ureteral exchange catheter is placed into the ipsilateral ureter under cystoscopic guidance. The patient is then safely turned and secured in the prone position. Percutaneous renal access is obtained under ultrasonographic or fluoroscopic guidance. Either a 24 or 30 french sheath is advanced in the kidney and nephroscopy is performed with a rigid offset nephroscope. Stone fragmentation is accomplished using a dual CyberWand lithotripter or holmium laser lithotripsy. Flexible nephroscopy is performed to look for possible residual fragments and basket extraction is done for complete clearance of stone.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	University of California, San Francisco	San Francisco	California

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of California, San Francisco	National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (12)

Barnes KT, Bing MT, Tracy CR. Do ureteric stent extraction strings affect stent-related quality of life or complications after ureteroscopy for urolithiasis: a prospective randomised control trial. BJU Int. 2014 Apr;113(4):605-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.12541. — View Citation

Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992 Jul 18;305(6846):160-4. — View Citation

Duvdevani M, Chew BH, Denstedt JD. Minimizing symptoms in patients with ureteric stents. Curr Opin Urol. 2006 Mar;16(2):77-82. Review. — View Citation

Haleblian G, Kijvikai K, de la Rosette J, Preminger G. Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: a systematic review. J Urol. 2008 Feb;179(2):424-30. Review. — View Citation

Joshi HB, Newns N, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh RP, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG. Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire: development and validation of a multidimensional quality of life measure. J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):1060-4. — View Citation

Kirac M, Bozkurt ÖF, Tunc L, Guneri C, Unsal A, Biri H. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm. Urolithiasis. 2013 Jun;41(3):241-6. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0552-0. Epub 2013 Mar 13. — View Citation

Kumar A, Kumar N, Vasudeva P, Kumar Jha S, Kumar R, Singh H. A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi: a single center experience. J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):160-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.088. Epub 2014 Jul 24. — View Citation

Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC; Urologic Diseases of America Project. Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis. J Urol. 2005 Mar;173(3):848-57. — View Citation

Pérez-Fentes DA, Gude F, Blanco B, Freire CG. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: short- and long-term effects on health-related quality of life. J Endourol. 2015 Jan;29(1):13-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0081. — View Citation

Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS; Urologic Diseases in America Project. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):160-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052. Epub 2012 Mar 31. — View Citation

Staios D, Andrews HO, Shaik T, Buchholz NN. Quality of life after percutaneous nephrolithotomy for caliceal diverticulum and secluded lower-pole renal stones. J Endourol. 2007 May;21(5):515-9. — View Citation

Tiselius HG, Ackermann D, Alken P, Buck C, Conort P, Gallucci M; Working Party on Lithiasis, European Association of Urology. Guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2001 Oct;40(4):362-71. Review. — View Citation

* Note: There are 12 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Change of overall quality of life (QOL) score as measured by Short form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire at late postoperative period	This instrument consisted of 36 questions with response ranging from 0 (poor QOL) to 100 (best QOL).	Change from baseline score at 3 months after surgery
Other	Change of overall quality of life (QOL) score as measured by Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) at late postoperative period	This instrument consisted of 38 questions in 6 non-uniformed categories with response ranging from the least (best QOL) to the most (poor QOL).	Change from baseline score at 3 months after surgery
Primary	Change of overall quality of life (QOL) score as measured by Short form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire at early postoperative period	This instrument consisted of 36 questions with response ranging from 0 (poor QOL) to 100 (best QOL).	Change from baseline score at 1 week after surgery
Secondary	Change of overall quality of life (QOL) score as measured by Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) at early postoperative period	This instrument consisted of 38 questions in 6 non-uniformed categories with response ranging from the least (best QOL) to the most (poor QOL).	Change from baseline score at 1 week after surgery