View clinical trials related to Pulpitis.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial was to compare the clinical and radiographic success of laser versus formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars. The main questions it aimed to answer was: • Does laser pulpotomy has higher clinical and radiographic success rate as formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars? Participants were selected according to eligibility criteria to undergo pulpotomy for their lower primary molars under local anesthesia using one of the following techniques: - Group 1: Formocresol - Group 2: Diode laser Group 3: Er:CrYSGG laser Clinical and radiographic follow up were performed for 18 months
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of Totalfil and Neosealer sealers on post-endodontic pain compared to AH plus sealer in mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. The main question: do Totalfil and Neosealer sealers affect postoperative pain intensity after root canal treatment in mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis? Participants will undergo root canal treatment using totalfil, Neosealer, or AH-Plus sealer. Researchers will compare Totalfil, Neosealer, and AH-Plus to assess the intensity of post-endodontic pain.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effect of cooling of local anesthesia on intraoperative pain during root canal treatment in mandibular molars diagnosed as symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. The main question it aims to answer is: Is there a difference in intra-operative pain levels using intra-pulpal anesthesia with and without cryotherapy during root canal treatment? Participants will undergo root canal treatment using intrapulpal anesthesia with and without cooling. Researchers will compare cold and room temperature intrapulpal anesthesia to see the intensity of intraoperative pain.
This study will aim to evaluate postoperative pain after intraligamentary injections of dexamethasone (4mg/ml), diclofenac sodium (25mg/ml), 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine given to the patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis after completion of the first appointment. Objectives: 1. To evaluate postoperative pain in patients receiving intraligamentary injections of either dexamethasone (4mg/ml), diclofenac sodium (25mg/ml), 0.5% bupivacaine or 2% lidocaine. 2. To compare the postoperative pain in different groups.
This randomised controlled trial aims to compare treatment outcomes between pulpotomy and pulpectomy when used to treat vital primary molars diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Compared to the standard pulpectomy treatment, pulpotomy is a technically simpler procedure, less time consuming, easier for young patients to tolerate, while retaining the proprioceptive sensation of the tooth - all important advantages when treating young children.
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the outcome of total amputation and root canal treatment with or without cryotherapy in terms of postoperative pain, quality of life, and treatment success for the management of deep dentinal caries. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does cryotherapy influence the outcome, life quality and treatment success in total pulpotomy? Does cryotherapy influence the outcome, life quality and treatment success in root canal treatment? Does the outcome of total pulpotomy and root canal treatment differ in cases of pulpitis? There are 4 experimental groups: 1. Total pulpotomy with cryotherapy group 2. Total pulpotomy group (Control 1) 3. Root canal treatment with cryotherapy group 4. Root canal treatment group (Control 2)
In this study, patients with symptoms of irreversible pulpitis in mature permanent molars were treated with two pulpotomies techniques after random allocation in either 2 groups: Diode laser pulpotomy and traditional pulpotomy using bioactive materials (retro mineral trioxide aggregate ) with each group.The null hypothesis of the study was there would be no difference in success rate between Diode laser and traditional methods of adult pulpotomy .
The teeth were randomly allocated in two equal groups : Control group (A):- included 20 mandibular primary molars in which pulpectomy were performed by hand instrumentation system using K- File from size 15 to size 35. Experimental Group (B):- included 20 mandibular primary molars in which pulpectomy were performed by rotary system using Kedo-SG rotary file system according to manufacturer's instructions Methods of Evaluation Stage I :- During and after canal preparation:- The following parameters were evaluated for all cases in both groups:- A- The instrumentation and canal filling time were recorded for both groups using stopwatch. B- Radiographic assessment for filling were done immediately postoperative to record :- 1. Distance between the apex to filling level of the mesial and distal roots . 2. Obturation form Stage II : Follow up : The follow up were carried out by clinical and radiographic evaluation for all cases in both groups:- The clinical evaluation were carried out at (0 base line = after 7 days ) then after 1 , 3 , 6 and 12 months . Radiographic evaluation were performed immediately postoperative as (0 baseline ) after cementation of stainless steel crowns for assessment of filling quality. Radiographs will be used for comparison for consequent radiographs . Follow ups were performed after 6 and 12 months.
This is a clinical trial to assess the treatment outcomes of pulpotomy in vital primary molars diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Pulpotomy is a more conservative treatment option over the conventional pulpectomy treatment. Compared to pulpectomy, pulpotomy is a technically simpler procedure, less time consuming, easier for young patients to tolerate, and retains the proprioceptive sensation of the tooth - all important advantages when treating young children.
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of a single rotary file system versus a multiple rotary files system in pulpectomy of primary molars