The Efficacy Of Mapping For Cognitive Prostate Biopsy

Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial

— MAPROSTATE  

Official title:

The Efficacy Of Mapping For Cognitive Prostate Biopsy: A Prospective, Randomized Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05902637
• Other study ID #: MAR.UAD.006
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 1, 2023
• Est. completion date: September 1, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: June 2023
• Source: Marmara University
• Contact: Yunus Emre Genc, MD.
• Phone: +905070554431
• Email: yunusemregencc5[@]gmail.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Today, many centers still perform Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) cognitive prostate biopsy. The efficacy of detecting clinically significant prostate cancer, which is thought to be due to the experience of the urologist who performed the sampling and the difference in experience of the radiologists who performed the Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance (MPMR) evaluation, has been reported between 25% and 34% in the literature.

In order to eliminate this reporting and sampling difference, The goal of this interventional study is to compare the effectiveness of Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance (MPMR) Imaging routinely taken before biopsy with a single-center randomized and prospective study and prostate biopsies to be performed by the same urologist with the mapping technique created by a single genitourinary radiologist working in our center with standard cognitive prostate biopsy and to contribute to the literature Type of study: Clinical trial participant population: Male patients with elevated serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) or indicated prostate biopsy by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) imaging and underwent Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance (MPMR) before the procedure Participants will undergo transrectal prostate biopsy with or without mapping, Researches will compare to see if the cancer detection rates differ

Description:

In this preliminary clinical study, 200 patients who underwent cognitive prostate biopsy under the guidance of transrectal ultrasonography between 01.03.2023 and 01.09.2023 by Marmara University Department of Urology, Department of Urooncology due to serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) elevation and/or abnormal rectal examination findings will be included in the study. All patients will undergo prostate biopsy under local or general anesthesia with transrectal ultrasonography by a single surgeon after mapping or report is extracted by a single genitourinary radiologist in the Department of Radiology of our hospital.

In the power analysis, 200 patients were included in the study with the prediction that the efficacy difference would be calculated as 5%. All patients will be randomized to two equal groups by the flip-flip method.

1. Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and reports of the mapped patients will be examined and cognitive prostate biopsy will be performed by looking at the map (Sample Figure 1,2) created by the same urologist and the same radiologist (Sample Figure 1,2). Standard 12 core (6 peripheral zones from both lobes) will be sampled and 4 extra biopsies will be taken from Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Category 3-4-5 areas in the mapping.

2. Based on the Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging reports and images, without mapping by the radiologist, only the standard 12 core (6 from each peripheral zone from both lobes) determined cognitively by the urologist and 4 extra biopsies from the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Category 3-4-5 areas described in the report will be taken.

And then the biopsy results will be compared to see the efficacy of mapping

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 200
• Est. completion date: September 1, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: August 1, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Male
• Age group: 40 Years to 90 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients with elevated serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)

• Indicated prostate biopsy by MR imaging and underwent Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance (MPMR) imaging before the procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with suspicious Rectal Examination findings

• Patients who cannot enter Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance (MPMR) imaging for various reasons (such as Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance (MPMR) imaging incompatible pacemaker, Chronic Kidney Disease)

• Patients with diagnosed prostate cancer and active surveillance

• Patients without indication for prostate biopsy

• Patients with very high serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) levels (>15)

• Patients who are planned to start treatment by diagnosing with standard 12 core biopsy without losing time with imaging method

• Patients who do not want to participate in the study.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Prostate Adenocarcinoma
• Prostate Cancer
• Prostate Cancer Stage
• Prostate Disease
• Prostatic Diseases
• Prostatic Neoplasms

Intervention

Procedure:
• Performing cognitive prostate biopsy with a radiologist's guidance with map
All patients will undergo prostate biopsy under local or general anesthesia with transrectal ultrasonography by a single surgeon after mapping extracted by a single genitourinary radiologist in the Department of Radiology of our hospital.
• Performing cognitive prostate biopsy without a radiologist's guidance with map
All patients will undergo cognitive prostate biopsy under local or general anesthesia with transrectal ultrasonography by a single surgeon after reported by a single genitourinary radiologist in the Department of Radiology of our hospital.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Turkey	Marmara University, School of Medicine, Department of Urology	Istanbul

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Marmara University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

References & Publications (8)

Barkovich EJ, Shankar PR, Westphalen AC. A Systematic Review of the Existing Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2) Literature and Subset Meta-Analysis of PI-RADSv2 Categories Stratified by Gleason Scores. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Apr;212(4):847-854. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20571. Epub 2019 Feb 26. — View Citation

Bell KJ, Del Mar C, Wright G, Dickinson J, Glasziou P. Prevalence of incidental prostate cancer: A systematic review of autopsy studies. Int J Cancer. 2015 Oct 1;137(7):1749-57. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29538. Epub 2015 Apr 21. — View Citation

Culp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, Bray F, Jemal A. Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):38-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Sep 5. — View Citation

Jansson KF, Akre O, Garmo H, Bill-Axelson A, Adolfsson J, Stattin P, Bratt O. Concordance of tumor differentiation among brothers with prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2012 Oct;62(4):656-61. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.032. Epub 2012 Feb 24. — View Citation

Lendinez-Cano G, Ojeda-Claro AV, Gomez-Gomez E, Morales Jimenez P, Flores Martin J, Dominguez JF, Amores J, Cozar JM, Bachiller J, Juarez A, Linares R, Garcia Galisteo E, Alvarez Ossorio JL, Requena Tapia MJ, Moreno Jimenez J, Medina Lopez RA; AEU-PIEM/2018/000 Investigators. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy in the detection of high-grade prostate cancer in biopsy-naive patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who underwent the Select MDx test. Prostate. 2021 Sep;81(12):857-865. doi: 10.1002/pros.24182. Epub 2021 Jun 29. — View Citation

Oerther B, Engel H, Bamberg F, Sigle A, Gratzke C, Benndorf M. Cancer detection rates of the PI-RADSv2.1 assessment categories: systematic review and meta-analysis on lesion level and patient level. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022 Feb;25(2):256-263. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00417-1. Epub 2021 Jul 6. — View Citation

Presti JC Jr. Prostate biopsy: how many cores are enough? Urol Oncol. 2003 Mar-Apr;21(2):135-40. doi: 10.1016/s1078-1439(03)00006-1. — View Citation

Wegelin O, Exterkate L, van der Leest M, Kummer JA, Vreuls W, de Bruin PC, Bosch JLHR, Barentsz JO, Somford DM, van Melick HHE. The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies. Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):582-590. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.040. Epub 2018 Dec 3. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Detecting prostate cancer	Detection of any kind or any grade of prostate cancer on the pathological specimen of Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy: Detection of prostate adenocarcinoma of any ISUP (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3, grade 4 or grade 5) / Gleason score (Gleason score 6-10); Detection of non-adenocarcinoma cancers of prostate (small cell carcinoma, neuroendocrine tumor, sarcomatous carcinoma, signet ring cell, basaloid carcinoma, pseudohyperplastic carcinoma, lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma, adenosquamous cell carcinoma)	6 months