Whether Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Under Local-anaesthesia Using a Transperineal-access System is Non-inferior to Standard Transrectal Biopsy to Detect Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men

Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial

Official title:

Randomized-controlled Trial: Whether Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Under Local-anaesthesia Using a Transperineal-access System is Non-inferior to Standard Transrectal Biopsy to Detect Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04108871
• Other study ID #: UW18-392
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 3, 2018
• Est. completion date: September 1, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: September 2019
• Source: The University of Hong Kong
• Contact: Research Assistant
• Phone: 852-22554852
• Email: stac[@]hku.hk
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Tranperineal prostate biopsy(TPB) and Transrectal prostate biopsy(TRUSB) are now both routine diagnosis methods of prostate cancer in Queen Mary Hospital. The TRUSB has been the most common way to sample prostate tissue for decades. The TPB has been employed as one of our routine diagnosis methods in early 2018. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether Tranperineal prostate biopsy using a noval transperineal access system under local anaesthesia is non-inferior to standard 12-cores Transrectal prostate biopsy in detecting prostate cancer (PCa), in patients with clinical suspicion of PCa with no prior prostate biopsy.

Description:

The incidence of prostate cancer (PCa) has increased considerably in recent years [1, 2]. The reported lifetime risk for men in Hong Kong to be diagnosed with PCa is 1 in 31 before the age of 75, and is currently the third commonest cancer Hong Kong men according to the Hong Kong Cancer Registry [3]. This highlights the importance of thorough and fundamentally a safe investigation technique to correctly identify patients with PCa. Such test should be able to sensitively detect PCa, and provide early diagnosis. Critically, such test is required to provide accurate disease risk stratification, which is absolutely crucial in guiding level of appropriate treatment is necessary in patients diagnosed with PCa.

According to recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, current standard clinical practice considers histological diagnosis of PCa a necessity in majority of patients presented with localized disease who are eligible for treatment [4]. This, alongside with prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, digital rectal examination (DRE) findings, and increasingly the use of multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) imaging, collectively allows risk stratification of PCa.

The current pathway to obtain prostate tissue for histological diagnosis of CaP is by transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy (TRUSB) of the prostate, usually following the detection of a raised serum PSA level and/or suspicious rectal examination findings. TRUSB has been the standard prostate tissue sampling technique for men suspected with PCa for over 30 years. It is an office-based procedure carried out under local anaesthesia (LA), with 10 to 12 biopsy cores directed towards the lateral peripheral zones of the prostate thought to harbour majority of cancers [7]. However, there are still various well-known cancer detection limitations and patient safety problems associated with TRUSB.

Firstly, a very significant portion of tumours are being missed with the TRUSB technique [8]. It has been well- known that over 30% of patients with low risk PCa on TRUSB have been found to harbour clinically significant PCa [9]. Many of these tumours missed on TRUSB are located in the anterior and apical regions of the prostate, which TRUSB is difficult to access, in particular in patients with a large prostate volume

Secondly, TRUSB requires the biopsy needle to penetrate through the bowel (rectum). This results in high risk of developing sepsis following biopsy, despite all patients undergoing the procedure being started on antibiotics prophylactically. This is a serious complication which can potentially be life-threatening. Our previous study has already demonstrated a high prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant and ESBL-producing rectal flora in our local population in Hong Kong [10]. The risk of developing post-biopsy sepsis in Hong Kong is high.

Transperineal prostate biopsy (TPB) has been developed to provide a more comprehensive biopsy method to improve cancer detection rate by directing biopsy cores through the perineal skin. Theoretically, TPB enables access to sample the entire prostate, in particular the anterior and apical regions which are not easily accessible through the standard TRUSB method. By sampling the prostate using biopsy needles directly inserted through the perineal skin rather than bowel, the risk of sepsis is reduced. However, this technique requires multiple needles traversing through the perineum, and requires to be carried out under general anaesthesia (GA). Another disadvantage is a stabilising stepping unit is required to provide a consistent alignment of the ultrasound probe against the prostate in order to carry out the biopsies. Such stabilising stepping units are costly.

A novel but simple transperineal access system device known as PrecisionPoint (Perineologic, Cumberland, MD, USA) has been developed to tackle the aforementioned limitations of TPB. This revolutionary device utilises a single access needle cannula mounted directly on to the ultrasound probe, which acts as an access point traversing through the perineal skin. This design minimises the number of needle punctures through the skin, enabling TPB to be carried out under LA. A stabilising stepping unit is not required with this technique. The device has gained the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval [11], and results from small contemporary series have already been published with very promising results in terms of cancer detection rate and safety [12].

TRUSB has a poor cancer detection rate and is associated with potentially fatal septic risk. TPB, if able to be carried out under LA as an office-based procedure, can potentially provide a better cancer detection rate with significantly reduced sepsis risk. It has fundamentally a very high potential to become the new gold standard in obtaining prostate tissue for histological diagnosis of PCa.

With an increasing number of men in Hong Kong with elevated serum PSA suspicion of PCa needing prostate biopsy, it is fundamental to carry out a study to determine the most effective, safe and tolerable prostate biopsy technique which fits with the clinical practice in Hong Kong.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 180
• Est. completion date: September 1, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: June 1, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Male
• Age group: 40 Years to 80 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Serum PSA larger or equal to 20ng/mL

• Suspected tumour clinical stage T2 on DRE

• No previous history of prostate biopsy

• Medically fit to undergo procedures according to study protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients who are unable to provide written informed consent

• Known history of prostate cancer

• Contraindication to prostate biopsy

• Had pre-biopsy mpMRI

• Rectal abnormality precluding transrectal ultrasound

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Hyperplasia
• Prostate Cancer
• Prostatic Hyperplasia
• Prostatic Neoplasms

Intervention

Procedure:
• Prostate Biopsy
Samples of tissue are removed from the prostate for histopathological diagnosis of prostate cancer through the use of a needle with the assistance of transrectal ultrasound.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Hong Kong	Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital	Hong Kong

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
The University of Hong Kong

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Hong Kong, 

References & Publications (8)

Falzarano SM, Zhou M, Hernandez AV, Moussa AS, Jones JS, Magi-Galluzzi C. Can saturation biopsy predict prostate cancer localization in radical prostatectomy specimens: a correlative study and implications for focal therapy. Urology. 2010 Sep;76(3):682-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.067. Epub 2010 Mar 5. — View Citation

Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol. 1989 Jul;142(1):71-4; discussion 74-5. — View Citation

Hsing AW, Tsao L, Devesa SS. International trends and patterns of prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Int J Cancer. 2000 Jan 1;85(1):60-7. — View Citation

Klotz L. Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep. 2015 Apr;16(4):24. doi: 10.1007/s11934-015-0492-z. Review. — View Citation

Meyer AR, Joice GA, Schwen ZR, Partin AW, Allaf ME, Gorin MA. Initial Experience Performing In-office Ultrasound-guided Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Under Local Anesthesia Using the PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System. Urology. 2018 May;115:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Feb 1. — View Citation

Nakai Y, Tanaka N, Anai S, Miyake M, Hori S, Tatsumi Y, Morizawa Y, Fujii T, Konishi N, Fujimoto K. Transperineal template-guided saturation biopsy aimed at sampling one core for each milliliter of prostate volume: 103 cases requiring repeat prostate biopsy. BMC Urol. 2017 Apr 5;17(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0219-1. — View Citation

Presti JC Jr, O'Dowd GJ, Miller MC, Mattu R, Veltri RW. Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study. J Urol. 2003 Jan;169(1):125-9. — View Citation

Tsu JH, Ma WK, Chan WK, Lam BH, To KC, To WK, Ng TK, Liu PL, Cheung FK, Yiu MK. Prevalence and predictive factors of harboring fluoroquinolone-resistant and extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing rectal flora in Hong Kong Chinese men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Urology. 2015 Jan;85(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.078. Epub 2014 Nov 8. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Detection rate of prostate cancer	Absolute differences in PCa detection rate will be calculated with 95% CIs. If lower bound of 97.5% CI for the difference in cancer detection rates of LA TP biopsy compared with TRUS biopsy is greater than -5%, then TP biopsy will be deemed non-inferior. If lower bound is greater than 0, TP will be deemed superior.	When histopathology results available, expected to be within 14 days following biopsy
Secondary	Procedure tolerability	The pain score of the procedure reported by patient	Immediately following test
Secondary	General health-related quality of life	EQ-5D-5L	Baseline and 30 days post-biopsy
Secondary	Quality of life concerning urinary symptoms	International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS)	Baseline and 30 days post-biopsy
Secondary	Quality of life concerning erectile function	International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)	Baseline and 30 days post-biopsy
Secondary	Rate of procedure induced sepsis		1 week to 30 days post-biopsy
Secondary	Detection rates of patients with clinically significant PCa	Ca Prostate with Gleason score larger or equal to 3+4	When histopathology results available, expected to be within 14 days following biopsy
Secondary	Maximum cancer core length (MCCL, mm)		When histopathology results available, expected to be within 14 days following biopsy
Secondary	Proportion of men go on to undergo definitive curative treatment for local disease (including surgery and radiotherapy)		After treatment decision, expected to be within 30 days following biopsy
Secondary	Procedure times (minutes)	Time from start of ultrasound probe insertion to probe removal	During test
Secondary	Cost per diagnosis of cancer (HKD)	The cost of each diagnosis based on the equipment, manpower and medication	30 days post-biopsy

External Links

•   11. United States Food and Drug Adminstration Approval of PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System.
•   Prostate cancer incidence statistics. Cancer research UK. London, United Kingdom: cancer research 2014.
•   The Hong Kong cancer registry. Hospital Authority, Hong Kong.