Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02397408
Other study ID # 145511
Secondary ID NCI-2015-00731R0
Status Completed
Phase Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date April 9, 2015
Est. completion date June 30, 2015

Study information

Verified date October 2020
Source University of California, San Francisco
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This phase II trial studies how well 11C-choline (carbon C 11 choline) and 18F-choline (fluorine F 18 choline) positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) imaging works in diagnosing patients with unfavorable intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer. Diagnostic procedures, such as 11C- and 18F-choline PET/MR may help find and diagnose prostate cancer and find out how far the disease has spread.


Description:

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the ability of 11C- and 18F-choline PET/MR to detect and localize prostate cancer within the prostate gland. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the ability of 11C- and 18F-choline PET/MR to detect the specific location of metastatic prostate cancer within pelvic lymph node regions in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. II. To assess the comparative performance of 11C- and 18F-choline PET/MR to already available imaging scans (bone scan, sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography [NaF PET/CT], multiparametric1H magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], and/or pelvic CT scans) for detecting and localization of disease within the prostate, lymph nodes, and distant metastatic sites. III. To determine the temporal distribution of 11C- and 18F-choline radiotracer in patients. The tissue uptake, retention, and clearance will be determined. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare regions of uptake on the 11C- and 18F-choline PET/MR to that on the sentinel lymph node imaging scans in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node-guided extended pelvic lymph node dissection. OUTLINE: Patients undergo 11C- and 18F-choline whole-body PET/MR imaging. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 3 hours


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 18
Est. completion date June 30, 2015
Est. primary completion date June 30, 2015
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Age: Patients must be >=18 years of age - Diagnosis: Patients must have a diagnosis of prostate cancer by histologic verification and a hypoechoic lesion seen on ultrasound. - Disease Status: Unfavorable intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer, per the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Score (CAPRA) (CAPRA 5-10) - Karnofsky Performance Status >=70 - Metastatic workup: Whole Body Sodium Fluoride (NaF) PET/CT or 99mTc Bone Scan - Planned to undergo radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection - Adequate bone marrow and organ function defined as follows: - Adequate bone marrow function: - Leukocytes >= 3,000/microliter (mcL) - Absolute Neutrophil Count >= 1,500/mcL - Platelets >= 100,000/mcL - Adequate hepatic function: - Total bilirubin - within normal institutional limits - Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/ serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) <= 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal - Alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) <= 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal - Adequate renal function: - Creatinine - within normal institutional limits OR - Creatinine clearance >= 60 mL/min/ 1.73m2 for patients with creatinine levels above institutional normal - Ability to understand a written informed consent document, and the willingness to sign it Exclusion Criteria: - Participation would significantly delay the scheduled standard of care therapy - Karnofsky performance status of < 60 - Inadequate venous access - Administered a radioisotope within 5 physical half lives prior to study enrollment - Have a medical condition or other circumstances which, in the opinion of the investigator would significantly decrease the chances of obtaining reliable data, achieving the study objectives, or completing the study.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Carbon C 11 Choline
Given intravenously (IV) prior to imaging
Fluorine F 18 Choline
Given intravenously (IV) prior to imaging
Procedure:
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) / Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Undergo whole-body PET/MR imaging

Locations

Country Name City State
United States University of California San Francisco San Francisco California

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of California, San Francisco National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (1)

Choi JY, Yang J, Noworolski SM, Behr S, Chang AJ, Simko JP, Nguyen HG, Carroll PR, Kurhanewicz J, Seo Y. (18)F Fluorocholine Dynamic Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- to High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Initial Clinica — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Mean Kinetic Parameters Reflecting Fluorocholine (FCH) Fluorine 18 FCH (F-18) Influx (K1) The average K1 values of primary tumors will be reported along with the standard deviation Day 1
Primary Mean Maximum Kinetic Parameters Reflecting F-18 Influx (K1max) The K1max values of primary tumors will be reported along with the standard deviation Day 1
Primary Average Standardized Uptake Value (SUVavg) The SUVavg values of primary tumors will be reported along with the standard deviation. Typically, a standardized uptake value (SUV), a quantity that incorporates the patient's size and the injected dose, that is more than 2.0 is considered to be suggestive of malignancy Day 1
Primary Mean of the Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) The SUVmax values of primary tumors will be reported along with the standard deviation. Typically, a standardized uptake value (SUV), a quantity that incorporates the patient's size and the injected dose, that is more than 2.0 is considered to be suggestive of malignancy. Day 1
Primary Sensitivity of Combined Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging Sensitivity (True Positive Rate, TPR) measures the ability of a 11C- and 18F-Choline PET/MR Imaging for Prostate Cancer to correctly identify patient status as respectively diseased or non-dis- eased and is reported as a percentage ranging from 0 -100 with higher percentages indicating a higher sensitivity to identify the prostate cancer using SUVmax . The sensitivity of the combined PET and MR imaging for prediction of pathologic extraprostatic extension will be reported. Day 1
Primary Specificity of of Combined Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging Specificity (True Negative Rate) measures the ability of a 11C- and 18F-Choline PET/MR Imaging for Prostate Cancer to correctly identify patient status as respectively diseased or non-dis- eased and is reported as a percentage ranging from 0 -100 with higher percentages indicating a higher specificity to identify the prostate cancer using SUVmax. The specificity of the combined PET and MR imaging for prediction of pathologic extraprostatic extension will be reported. Day 1
Primary Correlation of K1 of Primary Tumors With K1max A spearman rank correlation test was performed to test the correlation of K1 with K1max. Spearman's correlation coefficient (?) determines the strength and direction of the monotonic relationship between two variables. The Spearman correlation coefficient is reported in values from +1 to -1. A ?= +1 indicates a perfect association of ranks, a ? = zero indicates no association between ranks and a ? = -1 indicates a perfect negative association of ranks. The closer ? is to zero, the weaker the association between the ranks. Day 1
Primary Correlation of K1 of Primary Tumors With Average Standardized Uptake Value (SUVavg) A spearman rank correlation test was performed to test the correlation of K1 with the SUVavg of primary tumors. Spearman's correlation coefficient (?) determines the strength and direction of the monotonic relationship between two variables. The Spearman correlation coefficient is reported in values from +1 to -1. A ?= +1 indicates a perfect association of ranks, a ? = zero indicates no association between ranks and a ? = -1 indicates a perfect negative association of ranks. The closer ? is to zero, the weaker the association between the ranks. Day 1
Primary Correlation of K1max of Primary Tumors With SUVmax A spearman rank correlation test was performed to test the correlation of K1max with SUVmax. Spearman's correlation coefficient (?) determines the strength and direction of the monotonic relationship between two variables. The Spearman correlation coefficient is reported in values from +1 to -1. A ?= +1 indicates a perfect association of ranks, a ? = zero indicates no association between ranks and a ? = -1 indicates a perfect negative association of ranks. The closer ? is to zero, the weaker the association between the ranks. Day 1
Primary Correlation of K1max of Primary Tumors With SUVavg A spearman rank correlation test was performed to test the correlation of K1max with SUVavg. Spearman's correlation coefficient (?) determines the strength and direction of the monotonic relationship between two variables. The Spearman correlation coefficient is reported in values from +1 to -1. A ?= +1 indicates a perfect association of ranks, a ? = zero indicates no association between ranks and a ? = -1 indicates a perfect negative association of ranks. The closer ? is to zero, the weaker the association between the ranks. Day 1
Primary Correlation of SUVmax of Primary Tumors With SUVavg A spearman rank correlation test was performed to test the correlation of SUVmax with SUVavg. Spearman's correlation coefficient (?) determines the strength and direction of the monotonic relationship between two variables. The Spearman correlation coefficient is reported in values from +1 to -1. A ?= +1 indicates a perfect association of ranks, a ? = zero indicates no association between ranks and a ? = -1 indicates a perfect negative association of ranks. The closer ? is to zero, the weaker the association between the ranks. Day 1
Secondary Correlation of SUVmax of Primary Tumors With Serum Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Level A spearman rank correlation test was performed to test the correlation of SUVmax with a patients baseline PSA. Spearman's correlation coefficient (?) determines the strength and direction of the monotonic relationship between two variables. The Spearman correlation coefficient is reported in values from +1 to -1. A ?= +1 indicates a perfect association of ranks, a ? = zero indicates no association between ranks and a ? = -1 indicates a perfect negative association of ranks. The closer ? is to zero, the weaker the association between the ranks. Day 1
Secondary Correlation of SUVmax of Primary Tumors With Pathological Stage The system of pathological staging is developed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and is divided into 5 stages: stage 0 (zero) and stages I through IV (1 through 4). A spearman rank correlation test was performed to test the correlation of SUVmax with a patient's baseline pathological stage. Spearman's correlation coefficient (?) determines the strength and direction of the monotonic relationship between two variables. The Spearman correlation coefficient is reported in values from +1 to -1. A ?= +1 indicates a perfect association of ranks, a ? = zero indicates no association between ranks and a ? = -1 indicates a perfect negative association of ranks. The closer ? is to zero, the weaker the association between the ranks. Day 1
Secondary Correlation of SUVmax of Primary Tumors With Post-surgical Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) Scores The CAPRA is a 5 item questionnaire completed by the clinicians with a total score range from 0-10 calculated using points assigned to: age at diagnosis, PSA at diagnosis, Gleason score of the biopsy, clinical stage and percent of biopsy cores involved with cancer. A CAPRA score of 0 to 2 indicates low-risk, a score of 3 to 5 indicates intermediate-risk, and a score of 6 to 10 indicates high-risk. A spearman rank correlation test was performed to test the correlation of SUVmax with a patient's CAPRA score after surgery. Spearman's correlation coefficient (?) determines the strength and direction of the monotonic relationship between two variables. The Spearman correlation coefficient is reported in values from +1 to -1. A ?= +1 indicates a perfect association of ranks, a ? = zero indicates no association between ranks and a ? = -1 indicates a perfect negative association of ranks. The closer ? is to zero, the weaker the association between the ranks. After surgery, Up to 6 months
Secondary Comparison of SUVmax of Primary Tumors With Post-surgical Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) Score Groups The CAPRA is a 5 item questionnaire completed by the clinicians with a total score range from 0-10 calculated using points assigned to: age at diagnosis, PSA at diagnosis, Gleason score of the biopsy, clinical stage and percent of biopsy cores involved with cancer. A CAPRA score of 0 to 2 indicates low-risk, a score of 3 to 5 indicates intermediate-risk, and a score of 6 to 10 indicates high-risk. A Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare the SUVmax with patients classified as intermediate-risk and high risk based on their CAPRA Score. Means and standard deviations will be reported. After surgery, Up to 6 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05613023 - A Trial of 5 Fraction Prostate SBRT Versus 5 Fraction Prostate and Pelvic Nodal SBRT Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05540392 - An Acupuncture Study for Prostate Cancer Survivors With Urinary Issues Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05156424 - A Comparison of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise to Counteract Treatment Side Effects in Men With Prostate Cancer Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT03177759 - Living With Prostate Cancer (LPC)
Completed NCT01331083 - A Phase II Study of PX-866 in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05540782 - A Study of Cognitive Health in Survivors of Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting NCT04742361 - Efficacy of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT in Patients With Biochemial Recurrent Prostate Cancer Phase 3
Completed NCT04400656 - PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial
Completed NCT02282644 - Individual Phenotype Analysis in Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With CellSearch® and Flow Cytometry N/A
Recruiting NCT06037954 - A Study of Mental Health Care in People With Cancer N/A
Recruiting NCT06305832 - Salvage Radiotherapy Combined With Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) With or Without Rezvilutamide in the Treatment of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05761093 - Patient and Physician Benefit/ Risk Preferences for Treatment of mPC in Hong Kong: a Discrete Choice Experiment
Completed NCT04838626 - Study of Diagnostic Performance of [18F]CTT1057 for PSMA-positive Tumors Detection Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03101176 - Multiparametric Ultrasound Imaging in Prostate Cancer N/A
Completed NCT03290417 - Correlative Analysis of the Genomics of Vitamin D and Omega-3 Fatty Acid Intake in Prostate Cancer N/A
Completed NCT00341939 - Retrospective Analysis of a Drug-Metabolizing Genotype in Cancer Patients and Correlation With Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamics Data
Completed NCT01497925 - Ph 1 Trial of ADI-PEG 20 Plus Docetaxel in Solid Tumors With Emphasis on Prostate Cancer and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 1
Recruiting NCT03679819 - Single-center Trial for the Validation of High-resolution Transrectal Ultrasound (Exact Imaging Scanner ExactVu) for the Detection of Prostate Cancer
Completed NCT03554317 - COMbination of Bipolar Androgen Therapy and Nivolumab Phase 2
Completed NCT03271502 - Effect of Anesthesia on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy N/A