Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized Phase 2 Study Evaluating Abiraterone Acetate With Different Steroid Regimens for Preventing Symptoms Associated With Mineralocorticoid Excess in Asymptomatic, Chemotherapy-naïve and Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Patients
| Verified date | July 2019 |
| Source | Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of the study is to determine the safety and clinical benefit of the combinations of abiraterone acetate and prednisone or abiraterone and dexamethasone in prostate cancer patients. Prednisone will be given at one of three different dose schedules. Dexamethasone will be given at one dose schedule. This will include looking at what side effects occur and how often they occur. In addition the impact of the study drug on quality of life and pain will be evaluated. The study will also collect data on subsequent treatment of patients after they come off the study drug (approximately 4.5 years after the start of study treatment of the first subject participating in the study). By analyzing blood samples, the study aims to identify if some markers could help to understand if the treatment with abiraterone is effective and also help to understand if patients can become resistant.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 164 |
| Est. completion date | June 5, 2018 |
| Est. primary completion date | April 20, 2015 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | Male |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: Have a histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate Have metastatic disease documented by positive bone scan or by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging Have prostate cancer progression documented by prostate specific antigen according to Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 or radiographic progression according to modified RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, v1.1) criteria Be asymptomatic from prostate cancer. A score of 0-1 on BPI-SF Question #3 (worst pain in last 24 hours) will be considered asymptomatic Be surgically or medically castrated, with testosterone levels of <50 ng/dL (<2.0 nmol/L). If the subject is being treated with luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists or antagonists (subjects who have not undergone orchiectomy), this therapy must have been initiated at least 4 weeks prior to Day 1, Cycle 1 and must be continued throughout the study. Exclusion Criteria: Has a history of pituitary or adrenal dysfunction Has an active infection or other medical condition that would contraindicate corticosteroid use Has any chronic medical condition requiring corticosteroid treatment or has received prior corticosteroid treatment for prostate cancer Has a pathological finding consistent with small cell carcinoma of the prostate Has a known brain metastasis |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | |||
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium |
Belgium, Germany, Hungary, United Kingdom,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Experiencing Neither of the 2 Mineralocorticoid Excess Toxicity During the First 24 Weeks of Treatment | No mineralocorticoid excess is defined as experiencing neither of the 2 mineralocorticoid excess toxicities, that is, neither hypokalemia nor hypertension. | Week 24 | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate [Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 50 Percent (%) Decline From Baseline] at Week 12 | The PSA response is defined as a >= 50% decline from baseline according to the adapted Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 (PCWG2) criteria. For a PSA response to be confirmed, an additional PSA measurement obtained 4 or more weeks later has to show >=50% decline from baseline. | Week 12 | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Brief Pain Inventory- Short Form (BPI-SF) Score: Worst Pain | BPI-SF is 11-item self-reported questionnaire designed to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions (pain interference). It includes 4 questions that assess pain intensity/severity (worst, least, average, right now) and 7 questions that assess impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). BPI-SF scores range from 0=No pain to 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine; Higher scores indicate greater pain. Worst pain item has a scale of 0 to 10 with 0 indicating "No pain" and 10 indicating "Pain as bad as you can imagine". Last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach used for endpoint analysis. Last observation defined as last visit with non-missing data for parameter analyzed. | Baseline up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 156 weeks of main study treatment period [MSTP]) | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Brief Pain Inventory- Short Form (BPI-SF) Score: Pain Intensity Subscale | BPI-SF is 11-item self-reported questionnaire designed to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions (pain interference). It includes 4 questions that assess pain intensity/severity (worst, least, average, right now) and 7 questions that assess impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). BPI-SF scores range from 0=No pain to 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine; Higher scores indicate greater pain. Pain Severity Index is the mean of the 4 pain scores (worst, least, average, and right now) on the BPI-SF; range is 0=No pain to 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine; A higher score indicates greater pain severity. LOCF approach used for endpoint analysis. Last observation is defined as last visit with non-missing data for parameter analyzed. | Baseline up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 156 weeks of MSTP) | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Brief Pain Inventory- Short Form (BPI-SF) Score: Pain Interference Subscale | BPI-SF is 11-item self-reported questionnaire designed to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions (pain interference). It includes 4 questions that assess pain intensity/severity (worst, least, average, right now) and 7 questions that assess impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). BPI-SF scores range from 0=No pain to 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine; Higher scores indicate greater pain. Pain Interference Index is the mean of the scores for the 7 items of the BPI-SF; range is 0=Does not interfere to 10=Completely interferes. LOCF approach used for endpoint analysis. Last observation is defined as last visit with non-missing data for parameter analyzed. | Baseline up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 156 weeks of MSTP) | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Endpoint in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L): Index Score | EQ-5D-5L measures health outcome self-completed by respondents. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). The descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each has 5 levels (1-no problem, 2-slight problems, 3-moderate problems, 4-severe problems, 5-extreme problems). Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health "today". Responses were used to generate a Health Status Index (HSI). HSI ranges from -0.148 to 0.949 and is anchored at 0 (health state value equal to dead) and 1 (full health). LOCF approach used for endpoint analysis. Last observation is defined as last visit with non-missing data for parameter analyzed. | Baseline up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 156 weeks of MSTP) | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Endpoint in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L): EQ-VAS | EQ-5D-5L measures health outcome self-completed by respondents. It consists of EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). EQ-VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on scale of 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 100 (the best health you can imagine). LOCF approach used for endpoint analysis. Last observation is defined as last visit with non-missing data for parameter analyzed. | Baseline up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 156 weeks of MSTP) | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Questionnaire Score | FACT-P is a 39-item participant rated questionnaire which consists of 5 subscales assessing physical well-being (7 items; score range 0-28), social/family well-being (7 items; score range 0-28), emotional well-being (6 items; score range 0-24), functional well-being (7 items; score range 0-28), prostate-specific concerns (12 items; score range 0-48). Each item rated on 0 to 4 Likert type scale, then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as global quality of life (QoL) score that ranges from 0 to 156. Higher scores represent better QoL. Additional Concerns subscale has 12 items, each with a score 0-6 making a total subscale range 0-72 (higher scores are better). Missing data imputed as per FACT-P Ver4 scoring system (sum of item scores*number of items in subscale/number of items answered). | Baseline up to the Endpoint (last post-baseline assessment value during 156 weeks of MSTP) | |
| Secondary | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | PFS: Time from randomization to one of following: radiographic progression (RP), clinical progression (CP) or death. RP- per PCWG2 criteria and modified RECIST as time from randomization to one of following: 1) considered to have progressed by bone scan if: a) first scan with >=2 new lesions compared to baseline at <12 weeks from randomization and confirmed by second scan >=6 weeks later with >=2 additional new lesions, b) first scan with >=2 new lesions compared to baseline at >=12 weeks from randomization and new lesions on next bone scan >=6 weeks later; 2) Progression of soft tissue lesions per modified RECIST; CP: cancer pain requiring initiation of chronic use of opiate analgesia (oral use for >=3 weeks; parenteral use for >=7 days), Or immediate need to initiate cytotoxic chemotherapy or either radiation therapy or surgical intervention for complications due to tumor progression, even in absence of RP, Or deterioration in ECOG performance status to grade 3 or above. | Up to 4.9 years | |
| Secondary | Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression | Time to PSA progression was defined as time interval from the date of randomization to the date of the first prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression as defined in the protocol-specific Prostate Specific Antigen Working Group 2 (PSAWG2) criteria during the main study treatment period. PCWG2 defines PSA progression as the date that a 25 percent (%) or greater increase and an absolute increase of 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) or more from the nadir is documented, which is confirmed by a second value obtained 3 or more weeks later. | Up to 156 weeks | |
| Secondary | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline achieving a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria. RECIST criteria for CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions , any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 millimetre [mm] short axis). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. | Up to 4.9 years | |
| Secondary | Time to Opiate Use for Cancer-related Pain | Time to opiate use for cancer-related pain is defined the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date of opiate use for cancer pain. | Up to 156 weeks | |
| Secondary | Time to Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Score by 1 Point | Time to deterioration in ECOG Performance Status, the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date in which at least one point change (worsening) in the ECOG is observed during the main study treatment period. The ECOG performance status is a grade scale to measure quality of life (QoL). Scores run from 0 to 5, with 0 denoting perfect health and 5 denoting death. | Up to 156 weeks | |
| Secondary | Overall Survival | Overall survival was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. | Up to 156 weeks | |
| Secondary | Time to Next Prostate Cancer Therapy | Time to next prostate cancer therapy is defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of initiation of first next therapy for prostate cancer. | Up to 4.9 years |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT05540392 -
An Acupuncture Study for Prostate Cancer Survivors With Urinary Issues
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05613023 -
A Trial of 5 Fraction Prostate SBRT Versus 5 Fraction Prostate and Pelvic Nodal SBRT
|
Phase 3 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05156424 -
A Comparison of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise to Counteract Treatment Side Effects in Men With Prostate Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT03177759 -
Living With Prostate Cancer (LPC)
|
||
| Completed |
NCT01331083 -
A Phase II Study of PX-866 in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05540782 -
A Study of Cognitive Health in Survivors of Prostate Cancer
|
||
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT04742361 -
Efficacy of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT in Patients With Biochemial Recurrent Prostate Cancer
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT04400656 -
PROState Pathway Embedded Comparative Trial
|
||
| Completed |
NCT02282644 -
Individual Phenotype Analysis in Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With CellSearch® and Flow Cytometry
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06305832 -
Salvage Radiotherapy Combined With Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) With or Without Rezvilutamide in the Treatment of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06037954 -
A Study of Mental Health Care in People With Cancer
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05761093 -
Patient and Physician Benefit/ Risk Preferences for Treatment of mPC in Hong Kong: a Discrete Choice Experiment
|
||
| Completed |
NCT04838626 -
Study of Diagnostic Performance of [18F]CTT1057 for PSMA-positive Tumors Detection
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03101176 -
Multiparametric Ultrasound Imaging in Prostate Cancer
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03290417 -
Correlative Analysis of the Genomics of Vitamin D and Omega-3 Fatty Acid Intake in Prostate Cancer
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT00341939 -
Retrospective Analysis of a Drug-Metabolizing Genotype in Cancer Patients and Correlation With Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamics Data
|
||
| Completed |
NCT01497925 -
Ph 1 Trial of ADI-PEG 20 Plus Docetaxel in Solid Tumors With Emphasis on Prostate Cancer and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03679819 -
Single-center Trial for the Validation of High-resolution Transrectal Ultrasound (Exact Imaging Scanner ExactVu) for the Detection of Prostate Cancer
|
||
| Completed |
NCT03554317 -
COMbination of Bipolar Androgen Therapy and Nivolumab
|
Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT03271502 -
Effect of Anesthesia on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
|
N/A |