View clinical trials related to Problem Behavior.
Filter by:This study is a feasibility trial, testing the hypothesis that among sedentary mothers of behaviorally at-risk preschool-aged children, those who receive behavioral parent training (BPT) programs and concurrently increase their physical activity levels will demonstrate improved parenting and child behavior outcomes compared to those who receive BPT but remain sedentary.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether war-traumatize male adolescents with behavioral and emotional problems who participate in mind-body skills groups will have improvement in behavioral and emotional problems, aggression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, compared to a wait list control group.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an investigational device that has not been approved for the treatment of any medical condition by the FDA but is allowed to be used for research purposes. In clinical trials tDCS has been associated with pain relief by decreasing the intensity and duration of chronic pain. tDCS potentially works by stimulating the brain by delivering an extremely low-level electrical current to areas below the forehead - areas associated with chronic pain. It is anticipated that this current will increase brain activity or the likelihood of brain activity in these areas, affecting individual's ability to regulate pain. The purpose of this study is to compare eligible participants in the Pain Management Program at The Menninger Clinic receiving adjunctive real transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) versus those receiving sham tDCS in the resolution of chronic pain. The primary objectives are: (1) improving pain tolerance and (2) improving subjective pain experience. Secondary objectives are: (1) improving subjective experience of sleep quality and (2) increasing physical activity.
A significant minority of children (ages 5-12) display problematic sexual behavior and the persistence of this behavior is oftentimes as stable as other child behavior problems, such as aggression and defiance. Unfortunately, the only tested intervention protocols for these concerns utilize a group treatment modality that is not feasible in most community treatment settings. This project will define and pilot test an intervention for child sexual behavior problems that is applicable in most settings and can be easily disseminated as a first step toward validation in larger clinical trials.
This is a RCT study, aiming at evaluating the effectiveness of the Everyday Life in Balance (BEL) intervention. The intervention: The BEL was developed on the basis of previous research on lifestyle interventions made by the current research group and other researchers . It is a group-based programme (5-8 participants) with 12 sessions, one session a week, and 2 booster sessions with two-week intervals. The themes for the group sessions are, e.g., activity balance, healthy living, work-related activities, and social activities. Each session contains a main group activity and a home assignment to be completed between sessions. The main group activity starts with analysing the present situation and proceeds with identifying desired goals and finding strategies for how to reach them. The home assignment is aimed at testing one of the proposed strategies. Self-analysis, setting goals, finding strategies and evaluating the outcome of tested strategies form a process for each session, but also for the BEL intervention as a whole. After completed BEL, the participants will have developed an ability to reflect on their own situation and have strategies for changing their everyday life in a desired direction, such that they feel their everyday life has a satisfactory balance between rest and work, secluded and social activities, etc. The BEL intervention is led by occupational therapists. They take part in a specifically developed two-day education and follow the BEL manual [7]. They also participate in a web-based discussion forum where they can seek support from the researchers and/ or other BEL occupational therapists. Selection of units and participants: On the basis of blocks of four units, two are randomized to the BEL and two to the control condition, which is care as usual (CAU) and generally means standard occupational therapy. Occupational therapists in the units select participants based on the patients' needs for a lifestyle intervention and being likely to benefit from a group intervention. The same criteria are applied in the BEL units and the CAU units. Power analysis: The investigators desire 120 participants from each group. This will also allow for analysis of subgroups. Instruments: A number of self-report instruments tapping satisfaction with daily occupations, well-being, perceived worker role, social interaction, recovery etc., will be used, supplemented with qualitative interviews. Procedure: As the intervention starts, the attendees answer questionnaires about their personal situation regarding. Subsequently, the BEL is implemented in the units randomised to that condition. After 16 weeks of intervention (including the booster sessions), the measurements are repeated. A follow-up is then made after another six months. The same data collection is made at corresponding time points in the comparison units. Additional qualitative interviews are made in the intervention units, with strategically selected participants (attendees and staff) to get a deeper picture of the intervention process and its implications. When the research project is finished, the comparison units will be given the opportunity to go through the intervention. Analyses: The primary analysis concerns differences in outcomes between the BEL group and the CAU group. Analyses of the qualitative interviews, by means of grounded theory, will yield a more detailed description of the BEL and its implications, as perceived by both attendees and staff. Current state of the study: The project is in the initial phase and the first units were recruited in late 2012. At present, 24 units have been randomized to either condition. The second measurements (after completed BEL) have just been completed and follow-ups will continue until mid-2016, as will qualitative interviews. Analysing data and reporting results will continue until late 2018. By including 60 participants in each group the studies will be able to detect a medium effect size (ES=0.4), which would be a difference of clinical and practical significance. Age, gender and being of foreign origin will be considered as covariates, along with other socioeconomic factors such as family situation, educational level and money at one's disposal. Other factors that should be considered are the participant's functional status and diagnoses. Research has not shown that diagnosis per se plays any substantial role in the outcome of psychiatric rehabilitation, for the course of a psychiatric disability or for how people perceive their everyday occupations, but this should be investigated further because the evidence is inconclusive. Level of functioning, level of psychopathology, and negative symptoms have indeed been shown to be of importance for outcomes of psychiatric rehabilitation. Therefore, this project will also control for factors related to diagnosis and functional status.
Provide a description of patients admitted in the psychaitric department of the Mayotte Hospital
Evidence-based treatments (EBTs) are available for treating Disruptive Behavior Disorders ( DBDs) including Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT). Despite EBTs' potential to help children and families, they have primarily remained in university settings. Recognized field leaders have expressed concern over the discrepancy between treatment research and clinical practice, and have indicated that EBT implementation is a priority. Little empirical evidence exists regarding how effective commonly used training models are in changing clinician behavior, achieving full implementation (e.g., increasing treatment fidelity, integrating into service settings), and supporting positive client outcomes. This novel application will evaluate the effectiveness of three training models (Learning Collaborative, Train-the-Trainer, and Web-Supported Self-Study) to implement a well-established EBT in real-world, community settings. To accomplish this goal, the project will be guided by three specific aims: 1. to build knowledge about training outcomes, 2. to build knowledge about implementation outcomes, and 3. to understand the impact of training clinicians using LC, TTT, and SS models on key client outcomes. Seventy-two of 243 possible (30%) licensed psychiatric clinics across Pennsylvania will be randomized to one of three training conditions: 1. Learning Collaborative (LC), 2. Train-the-Trainer (TTT), or 3. Web-Supported Self-Study (SS). Data also will be collected on staff trained by clinicians in the TTT group given that the intention of a TTT model is for participants of that group to return to their organization and train others within the organization. The impact of training (clinician level) will be evaluated at 4 time-points coinciding with the training schedule: baseline, 6, 12, and 24-months. Immediately after training begins, parent-child dyads (client level) will be recruited from the caseloads of participating clinicians (N = 288). Client outcomes will be assessed at four timepoints (pre-treatment, 3, 6, and 12-months). Implementation outcomes (clinic level) will be assessed at baseline, 6, 12, and 24-months after training. This proposal builds on an ongoing state-led initiative to implement, and ultimately sustain, PCIT statewide. Lessons learned from this project will directly impact future EBT implementation efforts in Pennsylvania and other states, helping to increase the use of EBTs in community settings nationwide.
Profound multiple disabilities also called in French polyhandicap are defined by the combination of a deep mental disability and severe motor deficit with extreme restriction of autonomy. Life in institution for people with profound multiple disabilities induces emotional and educative deficiency and often conducts to behavioral disorders. These behavioral disorders also impact on quality of life and feelings of caregivers. An intensive multimodal educative program proposed to patients with profound multiple disabilities can improve their psychic well-being, reduce chronic pain and improve also quality of life and feelings of caregivers. The intensive multimodal educative program will be compared to the usual practice of educative program.
This study investigates the effectiveness of a clinic-adapted version of the Coping Power program compared to individualized child and family treatment for children with disruptive behaviour and their parents.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most frequent form of dementia, causing high level of disability with elevated social costs. Alternative solutions to the standard pharmacological therapies have been studied in order to reduce the use of medications that frequently generates side effects and worsen patients' quality of life. A recent alternative treatment for AD is the Environmental Ecological Therapy (EET) that, with the use of therapeutic gardens, seems to reduce behavioral disorders (BD). However, the effectiveness of this approach is still mater of debate. Therefore, the aim of this trial will be to analyze the effects of EET, in people with severe AD.