View clinical trials related to Polyps.
Filter by:This is a study to compare two different, but normally, used methods of colonoscopy in patients that require a routine or repeat colonoscopy. There will be three arms in this study: WE water control, water plus Cap-1, and water plus Cap-2. The patient will prepare himself/herself for the colonoscopy as per normal instructions and he/she will be given the information for the study at that time so that he/she can make a decision to participate in the study. The control method will use water instead of air inserted into the colon. The study method will use a new accessory, a cap that will fit onto the end of the colonoscope plus water during the procedure. This study will also confirm if using the cap method with water is a better way of detecting polyps in the colon and possibly cancer.
The study aims to compare the results between colonoscopies with two different attachments on the distal end of the colonoscope.
The aim of the study is to develop a computer program which is able to classify different entities of colorectal polyps on the basis of optical polyp features. In the end, the computer program shall differentiate between (i) hypeplastic polyps, (ii) adenomas and (iii) serrated adenomas . In the first phase of the study a computer program will be established which aims to distinguish between the above mentions entities on the basis of optical features derived from still images. A machine learning apporach will be used for creating the program. Afterwards, in a second phase of the study, still images of 100 polyps (not used in the first phase) will be presented to the computer program. Quality of the computer program will be tested by calculating the accuracy for differentiating the three different polyp types. The gold standard for true polyp diagnoses will be based on histopathological diagnoses of the polyps. The same pictures of 100 polyps will also be presented to human experts. Experts will also predict histopathological diagnoses on the basis of optical polyps featurs. Accuracy of computer-decisions and human expert predictions will be compared. The establishment of a well- functioning computer program is the primary aim of the study.
A Prospective Study: Longterm Follow Up until S2 (2nd surveillance) at 18 months after EMR for Large Flat/Sessile Colonic Polyps.
This prospective randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the new Optivista system compared to the iScan for his optical diagnosis and interval agreement monitoring with pathology. The Participants will be randomized to be diagnosed by either Optivista or Pentax iScan, and all polyps detected during the procedure, their size, location and morphology will be recorded according to the Paris classification after which all polyps will be resected per standard practices and sent for histopathologic evaluation. Further optical assessments will be performed for all polyps of 1-10 mm in size (WASP, NICE, SANO and SIMPLE classification) after with an analysis of comparison between optical diagnosis and pathology results will be performed.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common new cancer diagnosis and a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Early detection and treatment are critical factors in the course and prognosis of CRC, and screening programs have proven to be an important means to reduce both CRC related mortality and secondary economic burden. The diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive screening tests is still limited and a follow-up colonoscopy is required for confirmation of the diagnosis. The faecal occult blood test (FIT) is the most commonly used fecal screening test worldwide, but sensitivity for CRC ranges between 53%-99% depending on the cut-off values used, whereas sensitivity for advanced adenomas is disturbingly low (39%-57%). The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the AeonoseTM to distuinguish people with CRC from healthy controls.
The overall purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and durability of response of omalizumab in an open-label setting in adult participants with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps who completed the double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III studies GA39688 (NCT03280550) or GA39855 (NCT03280537). Participants will be eligible for enrollment in the study at, or within 28 days after, the Week 24 visit of Studies GA39688/GA39855. After enrollment into this open-label extension (OLE) study, participants will receive 28 weeks of dosing of omalizumab before entering a 24-week off-treatment observation phase of the study. Baseline in this OLE study is defined as the last pre-treatment measurement prior to randomization in Studies GA39688/GA39855 (i.e., baseline of Studies GA39688/GA39855). The data that will be reported from baseline to Week 24 inclusive will come from Studies GA39688/GA39855.
The study purpose is to assess the accuracy of experienced endoscopists at a community hospital in predicting histological types of polyps resected at colonoscopy using white light. Patients 50 years or older undergoing first-time screening colonoscopy will be included in this observational study.
To assess the efficacy of intra-sinus installation of a poloxamer gel that releases antibiotics and corticosteroids topically after balloon sinuplasty in chronic sinusitis patients with or without polyps. This is a single-blinded Randomized Control Trial study, in which every patient receives active gel on one side and placebo on the other (L or R to be randomly selected).
The study will compare the use of cold snare, hot snare, cold EMR, and hot EMR for polyp resection. Although previous studies have compared two of the potential resection methods, no previous study has evaluated all four of the resection methods.