View clinical trials related to Polypharmacy.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of providing a medication optimization program to improve patient health outcomes during the transition from hospital to home. This is because the period after hospital discharge is critical to long-term recovery, overall quality of life, and prevention of future hospitalizations.
Background Polypharmacy is a common condition among older adults and is a major issue of concern for its association with adverse drug reactions and adverse health outcomes, including falls, functional and cognitive impairment, frailty, and increased use of healthcare resources. Therefore, an appropriate interprofessional collaboration is essential to face this growing concern. In our outpatient clinic, we have initiated a new approach to provide specialized care for older adults based on a close collaboration between different professionals to optimize drug therapy. With the aim to assess the impact of this specialized outpatient clinic on patients' abilities, a prospective study will be conducted in community-dwelling older adults with polypharmacy. Methods The present study will be conducted with geriatric outpatients with polypharmacy (defined as ≥ 5 prescribed medications at the time of inclusion) in the Navarra University Hospital, a Spanish Public tertiary University Hospital. At least 104 patients aged 75 years or older, with a life expectancy ≥ 3 months willing to provide informed consent will be recruited from the outpatient clinic. Drug optimization in the first consultation will be accompanied by subsequent face-to-face and/or telephone follow-up at intermediate (~ 3 months) and end of study (~ 6 months). The primary endpoint will be the change in functional and cognitive capacities measured at baseline and follow-up. Secondary endpoints will be the analysis of medication changes (i.e. number of medications and drugs, type of intervention, anticholinergic burden, and the number of STOPP/START criteria), change in patient's quality of life, rate of falling, and use of healthcare resources. Discussion Regarding geriatric outpatients, studies in which medication review has been conducted by a multidisciplinary team (at least comprising a physician and a pharmacist) functional and cognitive patient's capacities have not been reported. What this study adds is the impact of a specialized consultation team focused on pharmacotherapy optimization in functional and cognitive abilities of community-dwelling older adults with polypharmacy. A multidisciplinary approach to polypharmacy could be an effective way for improving patients' functional and cognitive abilities. We expect that the association of different complementary professional roles working together will have a synergistic effect and will be an effective strategy for this purpose.
The World Health Organisation Patient Safety Challenge: Medication Without Harm has brought our attention to the importance of medication-related harm as a global public health issue. One of the major contributing factors is polypharmacy, the usage of multiple medicines at the same time. People are getting older and living longer with chronic diseases; they need more medications, which frequently leads to polypharmacy. Subsequently, they are at more risk of medication-related harm. The planned project is an epidemiological study on polypharmacy, medication appropriateness, risk factors, and clinical outcomes post-discharge from a hospital for surgical patients. The study group hypothesise that pre-and post-operative polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing is common, especially among older patients, patients with a high comorbidity and frailty burden, and patients undergoing more complicated surgery. Our hypothesis is additionally that preoperative polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing is associated with a higher short- and long-term mortality, a longer primary hospitalization length of stay, and a higher risk of readmission.
This study will evaluate the impact of academic detailing (evidence-based provider education) with or without patient pre-visit preparation (elicitation of values and preferences) on safe insulin de-prescribing among older patients with type 2 diabetes at risk for hypoglycemia. The hypothesis is that patients who are well-prepared for their primary care visit will engage in more informed discussions with their providers regarding re-evaluation of current treatment regimens. In clinically appropriate cases, these more effective discussions will result in safe de-prescribing and fewer future episodes of hypoglycemia.
In the past, prescribing many medicines (polypharmacy) was seen in a negative light. However, because people are living longer and have several medical conditions at the same time, views on polypharmacy have changed. The challenge is to have the correct balance between enough medicines and too many medicines. Members of the research team have developed a new approach to achieving this balance. This approach has been tested in two general practices in Northern Ireland (NI). The approach (intervention package) currently consists of two parts: (1) a video showing how general practitioners (GPs) can prescribe appropriate polypharmacy for older patients, and (2) an appointment system for patients to visit a GP to have their medicines reviewed. As the intervention package was developed and tested in NI, further testing needs to be carried out in NI and the six border counties of the Republic of Ireland (ROI; Cavan, Donegal, Leitrim, Louth, Monaghan, and Sligo). This will be done in three stages or phases. In phase 1, which is now complete, 13 GPs were interviewed across 12 practices in the six border counties in the ROI; shown the video, asked about this new approach and asked if any changes are needed before doing more testing. In the next two phases (Phase 2 & 3) a small study will be carried out involving 12 practices: six practices in NI and six practices in the six border counties in the ROI and approximately 10 patients per practice. GP practices will either receive the intervention package and conduct medication reviews with recruited patients (intervention group) or continue to treat recruited patients as usual (control group). Interviews with up to 10 GPs and six members of practice staff (i.e. those involved in implementing the intervention within each practice) respectively in the six intervention group practices will also be conducted at the end of the intervention. Patients from the six intervention group practices will be asked to complete a feedback questionnaire after the delivery of the intervention (i.e. after completion of their final follow-up questionnaires).
The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical and economic effectiveness of a pharmacogenomic (PGx) approach to prescribing medications in patients with high-risk polypharmacy in an integrated healthcare delivery system. Investigators hypothesize that patients who receive the RightMed® PGx test from OneOme, LLC with subsequent counseling of their prescribers by a study pharmacist, as needed, on the appropriateness of their prescribed medications will experience lower one-year follow-up healthcare utilization and expenditures compared to control patients who receive usual care.
This is a randomized trial testing a peri- and post-discharge pharmacist-led medication management intervention on post-discharge utilization, including both readmissions and emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge. The intervention incorporates evidence addressing three main areas: medication reconciliation, medication adherence, and polypharmacy. This study uses a pragmatic trial randomized at the patient level and conducted in two large hospitals to achieve the following aims, each of which has been designed using the RE-AIM framework: Aim 1: To test the effect of PHARM-DC on post-discharge utilization among patients most at risk for post-discharge ADEs: recently discharged older adults taking >10 medications or >3 high-risk medications using a prospective, randomized, pragmatic multi-site study. Aim 2: To study barriers and facilitators of implementing PHARM-DC using a qualitative study. Aim 3: To analyze the costs of PHARM-DC, including the incremental cost per readmission averted and the net incremental cost from the health system perspective using a time-and-motion study and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Deprescribing is a systematic method of withdrawing potentially inappropriate or unnecessary medications and is warranted in the elderly due to the high prevalence of polypharmacy. In particular, symptomatic control medications, such as acid suppressants, laxatives and painkillers, are frequently prescribed and continued, though such medications are rarely needed on a long-term basis. Therefore, the study objectives were to determine the cost savings, effects and feasibility of implementing a systematic process of deprescribing medications for symptomatic management, namely, acid suppressants, laxatives, analgesics, and antiemetics.
In this study, the investigators will investigate and characterize acute medical patients in order to optimize patient courses in the acute care departments, especially with regard to polypharmacy and undernourishment. In addition, the investigators will investigate underlying immunological mechanisms of chronic inflammation and biological aging in this population to improve the current knowledge and possibilities for preventing chronic diseases and acute hospitalization.
The study is a randomized study of patients living in four municipalities in Eastern Jutland. After geriatric assessment half of the patients will be offered a tailor-made intervention in their homes. The follow-up will last for at least 90 days and include treatment of the patients' multimorbidity, e.g. of dehydration, anaemia, infections, and malnutrition. The other half of the patients, the results of the assessment and recommendations will be given to the patients and their general practitioner. The primary efficacy variables are accomplishment of planned cancer treatment, reduction of complications and admissions to hospital and increased quality of life,. If geriatric assessment and a tailor-made follow-up result in a better quality of life with less complications and admissions the offer may be extended to a longer period, younger age groups and other cancer diagnoses.