View clinical trials related to Pneumonia.
Filter by:In this context, this study aims to explore the risk factors for mortality from VAP in respiratory ICU.
The current IDSA/ATS guidelines recommend Linezolid and Vancomycin for MRSA coverage in hospitalized patients with pneumonia, which is common clinical practice in Italy. However, a nasal PCR-assay for MRSA has a high negative predictive value and can facilitate rapid antibiotic de-escalation, thereby avoiding unnecessary anti-MRSA treatments. The indiscriminate use of these drugs has contributed to the emergence of resistant S. aureus strains and has led to significant adverse effects, without providing any survival benefits. Additionally, it has increased hospital stays and associated costs. The proposed study aims to use this diagnostic tool to shorten empirical anti-MRSA treatment duration in pneumonia patients, focusing on reducing antimicrobial therapy days while measuring in-hospital mortality, length of stay and adverse drug event incidence.
Reduce inappropriate antibiotic use is a priority of public health agencies. Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the most important indications for antibiotic prescriptions. In the majority of the studies of CAP, there is a large proportion of cases with no pathogen identified. Thus, the choice of the empirical antibiotic depends on the most likely pathogen, individual risk factors, comorbidities, and allergies. Patients aged 65 years or older are often treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate or with another broad-spectrum antibiotic (third-generation cephalosporins, antipneumococcal fluoroquinolone). However, broad-spectrum antibiotic prescription in CAP is debated and concerns exist about side-effects and selective pressure for resistance. Due to lack of head-to-head antibiotic comparisons, a recent Cochrane review concluded that current evidence from Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) is insufficient to make evidence-based recommendations for the choice for antibiotic to be used, highlighting an important evidence gap.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of dialectical treatment in the patients with CAP after discharge in a prospective cohort study: one is the Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) cohort, which has been evaluated and has certain effects; The other is a non traditional Chinese medicine queue.
Patients who have suffered a pneumonia used to reduce their activity levels because of the symptoms and the fear to suffer breathlessness. These patients often have sequelae after the hospitalization that previous studies have associated with a lack of physical activity. The main objective of this research is to investigate the efficacy of a rehabilitation program for promotion higher activity levels in quality of life and self-perceived discapacity of pneumonia patients.
This is a Phase II, multi-center, double-blind, randomized, interventional study in approximately 120 subjects to evaluate clinical benefit of CX-4945 in adult outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viral infection-associated pneumonia. The subjects will be recruited into two domains, including SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus domains. The study will compare the efficacy of Standard of Care (SOC) combined with CX-4945 against SOC paired with a placebo, utilizing a 1:1 allocation ratio in each domain.
The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to compare standard of care, low-flow oxygen, and high-flow nasal canula oxygen in pediatric patients aged 1-59 months with pneumonia and an oxygen saturation of 90-93% in Malawi. The main question it aims to answer is: - Does the protocol for the randomized control trial work well? - Can the researchers safely conduct the protocol for the trial? Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups (normal care without oxygen, low-flow oxygen, and high-flow nasal cannula oxygen) and treated with that therapy in the hospital. Researchers will look at the ability to safely conduct each part of the study.
This is a mixed-methods program evaluation from a health systems and policy perspective, involving (i) stakeholder analysis, (ii) policy-implementation gap analysis, and (iii) comparative country case studies. This study aims to understand how national oxygen strategies achieve impact at national, and subnational level, across country contexts, at what cost. The the investigators seek to: 1. Involve policymakers, implementers (including private sector), and medical oxygen users in identifying challenges and understanding potential solutions to medical oxygen access; 2. Generate new data on how medical oxygen systems work and can be improved from multiple perspectives; 3. Draw lessons on medical oxygen that can directly inform national and global practice and policy. This study will be conducted in 6 of the 9 countries participating in the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) led Medical Oxygen Implementation (MOXY) program (Uganda, Nigeria, Rwanda, Liberia, Lao PDR, Cambodia). Key informants will be selected representing government, non-governmental agencies, professional associations, private sector, and civil society. This study will be completed over 4 years, with timelines varying between country study sites.
This is a Phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, non-inferiority study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefepime-taniborbactam compared to meropenem in patients ≥ 18 years of age with ventilated HABP or VABP.
This study intends to use a standardized cohort study to collect biological samples (including throat swabs, sputum and blood) from subjects eligible for inclusion, and use 16s DNA / metagenomic sequencing and metabolome technology to explore the microbial-host interaction relationship of SAP patients.