View clinical trials related to Pleural Effusion.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical research study is to compare 2 different methods for treating a pleural effusion. Researchers also want to learn how the treatment you receive effects your quality of life (your ability to do the things you like to do and how happy you feel.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether chest tubes to drain transudative pleural effusions helps patients come off mechanical ventilation earlier.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the addition of the bisphosphonate Zometa (zoledronic acid) used along with standard regimens of chemotherapy, will help to control the need for palliative intervention of malignant pleural effusions due to non-small cell lung cancer.
Purpose and Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine if the rate of spontaneous pleurodesis using the Pleurx® catheter could be increased by simply increasing the frequency of pleural drainage and, if so, whether catheter-related complications can be minimized and spare patients the need for long term management of the Pleurx® catheter.
This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II study to compare a triplet combination of CBP501, pemetrexed and cisplatin with pemetrexed/cisplatin when administered to patients with locally advanced (stage IIIB with malignant pleural effusion or pericardial effusion) or metastatic (stage IV) non-squamous NSCLC as consecutive i.v. infusions according to a once-every-3-weeks schedule. The protocol will evaluate full-dose cisplatin and pemetrexed with or without CBP501. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to pemetrexed, cisplatin and CBP501 (Arm A) or pemetrexed and cisplatin (Arm B). Randomization will be stratified according to whether or not patients are eligible for bevacizumab therapy. The combination of cisplatin/pemetrexed has come to be recognized as the new standard of care for patients with untreated, unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) and untreated NSCLC non-squamous cell histology. Preclinical and clinical findings that support this protocol are: - CBP501 has exhibited interesting preclinical activity in various lung cancer cell lines. - Synergism was documented with CBP501/cisplatin in the preclinical studies with lung cancer cell lines. - The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of CBP501 was rapid onset allergic reaction, as was suggested by preclinical toxicology. Other toxicities were quite limited. No evidence of potentiation of either CBP501 or cisplatin toxicity was found in the combination phase I trial, and the toxicity of the combination, primarily related to cisplatin, is manageable. It is expected that CBP501 and pemetrexed will display non-overlapping toxicity profiles in combination, given that hematological toxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity are the principal toxicity types of the latter. - Given the acceptable safety of the cisplatin/ pemetrexed combination, it is anticipated that the addition of CBP501 to this combination can be evaluated without excessive risk in the phase II programs. - The phase I study of CBP501 in combination with pemetrexed/cisplatin (phase I part of the mesothelioma program) did not show DLTs or evidence of enhancement of toxicities with the triplet combination. The RD of CBP501 25 mg/m², cisplatin 75 mg/m² and pemetrexed 500 mg/m² is currently in use in the phase II study with first line mesothelioma patients. - Hints of activity were observed during the phase I study with CBP501 and cisplatin. - No pharmacokinetics (PK) interaction was documented between cisplatin and CBP501.
Collections of fluid around the lung (pleural effusions) are common in patients on mechanical ventilation. Long stays on mechanical ventilation can lead to serious complications such as pneumonia and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The drainage of pleural effusions may lead to improvements in oxygenation making it easier to discontinue mechanical ventilation. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of thoracocentesis (pleural fluid drainage) on blood oxygenation over a 48 hour period to see whether the effects are sustained and therefore helpful in this discontinuation.
RATIONALE: Studying samples of pleural fluid in the laboratory from patients with lung cancer may help doctors identify early lung cancer cells. It may also help the study of lung cancer in the future. PURPOSE: This laboratory study is looking at malignant pleural effusion samples from patients with primary lung cancer to see if early lung cancer cells can be identified.
Fluid caused by cancer cells may accumulate in the lining of the lung. Draining the fluid with a chest tube may relieve pain and shortness of breath. To stop the fluid from coming back again, patients are given a medicine (talc) into the chest drain to seal up the space around the lung. This procedure is known as pleurodesis. This sometimes causes pain and discomfort, and the investigators do not know the best way of preventing this. The investigators hope to find the best way to prevent pain during pleurodesis.
The purpose of this study is: - To study the clinical usefulness of nurse-performed ultrasound and echocardiographic examinations in a cardiac intensive care unit. - To study reproducibility of nurse-performed ultrasound and echocardiographic examinations in a cardiac intensive care unit. - To study which ultrasound measure that best correlate with the amount of pleural effusion.
The purpose of this study is to analyze and compare radiological lung expansion after talc pleurodesis performed either by videothoracoscopy or chest tube and correlate it with clinical outcome. Secondary endpoints evaluated were: clinical efficacy, safety, quality of life and survival.