View clinical trials related to Peri-implantitis.
Filter by:The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness, in terms of clinical and radiographic changes, of non-surgical peri-implant therapy (mechanical/chemical) versus regenerative surgical therapy (xenograft and collagen membrane), after a follow-up period of 12 months.
This study will be carried out to evaluate the efficacy of Er: YSGG laser on oral biofilm removal from implant surface in various peri-implant defect morphology in the treatment of peri-implantitis as a primary objective. To assess the morphological changes and the biological response (biocompatibility) of implant surface after Er: YSGG laser therapy through Profilometer analysis and cell culture process to detect attachment, differentiation, and mineralization of Isolated rat Bone Marrow Mesenchymal stem cells (rBMMSCs) respectively as secondary objectives.
This in-vivo study investigates early (48h), mature (2 weeks) and long-term (3 months) biofilm formation and composition on temporary push-on cones (exchangeable conical rings) made of noble-alloy-based materials (Pagalinor, PA) in comparison to Titanium-6Aluminum-7Niobium alloy (TAN) presently used in the transmucosal portion of dental implant abutments.
Background: The control and maintenance of implants, bone tissue and soft tissue are fundamental for the clinical success of implant prostheses (PSIs). The type of ceramic surface finish can modify the biological response of peri-implant tissues adjacent to PSIs over time. Objective: To prospectively assess whether the peri-implant health of soft and hard tissues adjacent to monolithic zirconia PSIs varies with the type of surface finish (glazed or polished). It will also be evaluated if the patient perceives any clinical, comfort or satisfaction difference. Methodology: The study design is a randomized, prospective, paired clinical trial, with intra-subject comparison. The sample will consist of consecutive patients in need and indication for treatment with monolithic zirconia PSIs, attended at the Military Policlinic of Porto Alegre and in a private practice by a single specialist researcher. For each PSI, the allocation of a glazed or polished surface in contact with the soft gingival tissue will be randomized on the mesial and distal sides of the crown. Data will be collected by routine clinical and radiographic examination with a focus on peri-implant health (hygiene index, gingival bleeding index, crestal bone level), satisfaction questionnaire and intraoral images (thermography and photographs), after one week of installation of the PSI and in six months, one year and two years. The data will be analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics, at the significance level of 0.05.
This is a laboratory-based study and it aims to evaluate the expression of inflammasomes in healthy gingiva and in the presence of peri-implantitis and periodontitis
Soldiers operate in environments that are more likely to lead to oral trauma, risking poor dentition which can directly impact military readiness. Dental restoration can often be accomplished via dental implant insertion. Microbiome-associated complications that result in bone loss, including the micro-leakage of bacterial species proliferating in the dental implant internal cavity, frequently lead to implant failure. Reduction in implant bacterial load may result in a shift of the composition of the microbiome in favor of less pathogenic species, potentially improving dental implant success rates, reducing surgical revisions, and associated cost savings. This study aims to determine how disinfectant gel (hydrogen peroxide or chlorhexidine) insertion into dental implant internal cavities affects implant failure rates, bacterial load and microbiome composition.
The aim of this study will be to compare the long-term outcomes of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants in patients previously treated for periodontitis and in periodontally healthy patients (PHP) after a follow-up of at least 20-years.
Dental implants are widely used in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients, but the interaction between immune status and success of implant therapy, especially in such patients, is not clear. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of peri-implantitis in HIV-positive patients and to evaluate the presence of a possible correlation between the immunological profile and serological values of the same HIV-positive patients, of peri-implantitis, and of possible differences between all-on-4 and single crown/bridge prostheses in terms of peri-implant disease and the variables analyzed. This cross sectional study included 85 adult HIV-positive patients (394 implants) with at least one dental implant loaded for more than a year who were followed for at least one year. The patients were divided into patients with all-on-4 prosthesis and those with single crowns/bridges to assess the differences between the two types of prostheses in the inflammatory state, in the presence of mucositis and peri-implantitis, and in the variables analyzed. The following clinical parameters were assessed: full-mouth plaque score (FMPS), full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS), probing pocket depth (PPD) in six sites per implant and tooth (deepest value for each implant and tooth was registered), PI and BoP measured as presence/absence at six sites per implant and tooth, presence of suppuration, mobility (measured by manual palpation) and number of lost teeth.
Although smoking has been proposed as well, as a risk factor/indicator for peri-implantitis, there is currently no conclusive evidence. The current literature confronts the inconclusive evidence of tobacco for a risk factor. Therefore, the aim of the present investigation is to determine the association between tobacco and peri-implantitis in sample of patients who had received therapy implant-supported restorative therapy in a university setting. The present study was designed as a retrospective case control study in a sample of patients with implant-supported restorative therapy 7-19 years after restorative phase. The study was conducted at the Clinica Universitaria d'Odontologia (CUO) in the Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC) for 1 month and was performed following the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki (revised, amended, and clarified in 2013. Prior to enrol the study a written informed consent was signed. Patients provided with implant-supported restorative therapy between 2001-2013 was selected from the UIC database. The sample was divided in three groups: healthy patients, patients with mucositis and patients with peri-implantitis. During the examination, the clinician reviewed with the patient the Information and Medication History Forms and record the anthropometric, socio-demographic and clinical information. An initial questionnaire was conducted to obtain information regarding age, gender, medical history, medication, and health behaviour. Candidates underwent an oral pathology examination and a full-mouth probing using a standardize pressure (20N) probe SONDA PA_ON (Orange Dental®, Aspachstr, Biberach, Germany) to determine their periodontal and peri-implant status. All statistical analyses were performed with the package RStudio (V2.5). Descriptive characteristics regarding all the covariates were summarized. Periimplant bone loss (95% Confidence Interval - 95% CI) were calculated both at implant- and at patient-level. A multilevel regression model will be applied to evaluate the influence of some risk/protective indicators on the risk for peri-implant bone loss. Risk/protective indicators for periimplantitis will be studied using multilevel (mixed-effects) multivariate regression analyses (patient- and implant-level). Each potential indicator was tested individually by adding it to an empty model having as dependent variable the peri-implant status and testing the significance.
The goal is to evaluate, after 5 to 8 years, the marginal bone loss around tissue-level implants and bone-level implants in patients who have not followed the maintenance program. Medical records of patients who have been implanted for at least 5 to 8 years and who have been lost during this period are collected from three private clinics in Beirut,Lebanon and the Saint Joseph University Health Center in Beirut,Lebanon. On an individual sheet, the patient as well as the implants data will be noted. Patients will be called for reevaluation after 5-8 years. After signing the informed consent, the measurements by a PCP-15 probe of the plaque index (FMPS) and the bleeding index (FMBS) as well as the height of the keratinized tissue are indicated on the sheet. If the smoking status has changed, this will be mentioned too. The marginal bone loss will be measured on the X-rays taken immediately after the implant placement, after 1 year of loading and then at the reevaluation session.