Clinical Trials Logo

Pelvic Organ Prolapse clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03120689 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

VITOM Study: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

VITOM
Start date: June 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is research in which students are queried by questionnaires on their satisfaction with and experience with certain educational practices (use of a camera image projecting during a live surgery) or with pre-recorded video. As data collection only involves survey data collection and satisfaction with an educational experience, and randomization/intervention is only involving use of one type of educational method versus another .

NCT ID: NCT03113513 Active, not recruiting - Quality of Life Clinical Trials

Comparison of Two Apical Repair Methods in Women Undergoing Repairs for Prolapse

Start date: May 1, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To date no study has determined prospectively which technique is superior to prevent recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) after vaginal hysterectomy- a major unmet clinical need. The aim of the study is to determine objective anatomical recurrent prolapse after Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation (SLF) vs McCall.

NCT ID: NCT03098641 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Smartmesh Technology in Pelvic Floor Repair Procedures

Restorelle
Start date: May 1, 2017
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Pelvic organ prolapse repair involves conservative treatments and surgical treatments. Conservative treatments are for patients with moderate prolapse. Treatment of symptomatic prolapse remains essentially surgical. According to detailed medical history and a thorough physical exam, surgical techniques may be performed by high abdominal, low vaginal or mixed routes with or without the use of a reinforcing implant. Restorelle Direct Fix is indicated for transvaginal anterior and posterior surgical repair either as mechanical support or as reinforcement of pelvic floor defects. Advantages and disadvantages of vaginal prostheses are known but only limited data have been reported on the use of Restorelle® in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. This study is designed to collect data on the safety and efficacy of Restorelle® Direct Fix in pelvic organ prolapse repair.

NCT ID: NCT03094442 Withdrawn - Quality of Life Clinical Trials

Does Dexamethasone Administration Improve Recovery In Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy?

Start date: December 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary aim is to evaluate whether standard administration of Dexamethasone at the time of general anesthesia induction at the time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISC) would result in improved quality of recovery (QoR).

NCT ID: NCT03077490 Completed - Prolapse Genital Clinical Trials

Comparison of Single Versus Multicenter Outcomes for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Using a Mesh-capturing Device

KIDS
Start date: March 4, 2015
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Comparison of single versus multicenter outcomes for pelvic organ prolapse repair using a mesh-capturing device (The Uphold™ Vaginal Support System for apical and vaginal wall prolapse - Boston Scientific). 1-2 years follow up study comprison of 112 vs 207 patients.

NCT ID: NCT03071211 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Catheter Management After Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery

Start date: February 26, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a randomized controlled trial comparing plug-unplug catheter management, continuous drainage catheter systems and patients that do not get discharged with catheters after inpatient pelvic reconstructive surgery.

NCT ID: NCT03070873 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Anatomical and Functional Outcomes of Perigee and Apogee Mesh in Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Versus Gynecare Prolift

mesh
Start date: January 1, 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The investigators designed a prospective study in this article to evaluate the efficacy, the life quality and the complications of two different meshes of type I (one is Perigee/Apogee, the other is named Gynecare prolift) versus traditional surgery, and also studied the influence of some surgical procedures on the prognosis.

NCT ID: NCT03064750 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Pelvic Floor Exercise Before Surgery in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse

CONTRAPOP
Start date: January 1, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The lifetime risk for a woman to undergo surgery for either vaginal prolapse or urinary incontinence is high. There are many different surgical techniques for treatment of prolapse, but there is a lack of knowledge about factors that contribute to objective result and patient satisfaction after surgery. The aim of the study is to investigate factors that could be related to patient satisfaction and objective result such as pelvic floor muscle contractility/strength and muscle injury, objective measures of prolapse and women's symptoms. This study will investigate whether systematic pelvic floor exercise and life style advise before surgery can improve outcomes after surgery for either vaginal prolapse. Another aim is to determine an ultrasound scale for measure of pelvic floor muscle contraction.

NCT ID: NCT03053479 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Comparison of the Efficacy of Sacrocolpopexy, the Amreich-Richter Procedure and Transvaginal Mesh

SAME
Start date: September 1, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Pelvic organ prolapse, POP, is a common health problem affecting up to 40% of women. Very little is known about the factors associated with surgical failure. Studies have identified a variety of risk factors: younger age, high body mass index and advanced preoperative prolapse (grade III-IV) have been associated with an increased risk of reoperation in some studies. According to some studies patients had poorer anatomical outcome after traditional repairs but were able to enjoy the same quality of life as after transvaginal mesh surgery or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the efficacy of these three procedures in a randomized controlled trial.

NCT ID: NCT03052985 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Materiovigilance After Urinary Incontinence or Prolapse Surgery

VIGI-MESH
Start date: February 14, 2017
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Observatory of Materiovigilance After Surgery of Urinary Incontinence or Prolapse in Women Implantable medical devices (meshes) used in pelvic organ prolapse surgery (genital prolapse, rectal prolapse), or incontinence surgery may be source of severe complications.