View clinical trials related to Patient Reported Outcomes.
Filter by:Status epilepticus (SE) is a common life-threatening neurological emergency in which prolonged or multiple closely spaced seizures can result in long-term impairments. SE remains associated with considerable mortality and morbidity, with little progress over the last three decades. The proportion of patients who die in the hospital is about 20% overall and 40% in patients with refractory SE. Morbidity is more difficult to evaluate, as adverse effects of SE are often difficult to differentiate from those attributed to the cause of SE. Our experience suggests that nearly 50% of patients may experience long-term functional impairments. The precise description of the consequences of these functional impairments and their impact on quality of life after SE requiring intensive care management has been little studied. Indeed, if cognitive, physical and mental impairments are now identified in the populations of patients who required intensive care under the term postresuscitation syndrome (PICS), neuronal lesions consecutive to the SE itselfor to its cause could be responsible for these different functional alterations. Thus, the following have been described: (i) cognitive disorders in the areas of attention, executive functions and verbal fluency, visual and working memory disorders, but also spatio-temporal disorders; (ii) physical disorders such as the so-called post-resuscitation polyneuromyopathy; and (iii) mental disorders such as anxiety disorders, depressive states or those related to post-traumatic stress. Assessment and characterization of patient-reported outcomes is essential to complement the holistic assessment of clinically relevant outcomes from the patient's perspective. The POSEIDON study was a cross-sectional collection of PROs and HR-QOL components, and associated with patient functional outcomes, in those who required ICU management for status epilepticus. We propose here to continue the description of potential alterations after a subsequent ME, namely a longitudinal study (POSEIDON 2) which will also include the evaluation of patient-reported experience (PREMS) and the measurement of family burden.
Immunotherapy shows satisfactory effectiveness and safety in patients with esophageal cancer. Immunotherapy-based regimens have a better survival benefit compared to previous chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) provide a reliable assessment of patients' functional status during treatment. However, the spectrum of symptoms in esophageal cancer patients receiving immunotherapy is uncertain, and there are no studies applying the symptom bank based on PRO to the immunotherapy model for esophageal cancer. In this prospective study, the investigators aimed to preliminarily screen for symptoms associated with immunotherapy for esophageal cancer through a systematic literature review and expert evaluation, and build a symptom item bank for esophageal cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. Adverse symptoms in esophageal cancer patients treated with immunotherapy were collected prospectively. The distribution and severity of the symptoms, as well as the trajectory of symptom change were further analyzed to demonstrate the validity and reliability of the symptom item bank. It would refine the spectrum of symptoms for esophageal cancer patients receiving immunotherapy and provide a foundation for assessing the specific symptom burden in patients with esophageal cancer receiving immunotherapy regimens.
Upper abdominal pain (UAP) is a common symptom and frequently the reason to visit the hospital. The prevalence of epigastric pain in the Dutch population is estimated to be as high as 37%. Moreover, Dutch hospitals yearly record >100.000 diagnoses related to UAP. In most patients, UAP can be attributed to symptomatic (functional) dyspepsia (FD), Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) or uncomplicated gallstone disease (cholecystolithiasis), with a prevalence in the general population of 20-30%, 20%, and 6-9%, respectively. However, these conditions may have overlapping symptom patterns and generally affect similar populations. which contributes to ineffective (diagnostic) interventions. Patients are generally not aware of the similarity of symptoms and the poor outcome of some treatments. Education positively influences patients' self-management and health judgment. In a recent open-label, multicentre trial the effectiveness of web-based patients' education is applied to reduce overuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopies in patients with dyspepsia. This study illustrated that an web-based education tool safely reduced 40% in upper gastrointestinal endoscopies. Lifestyle interventions (such as change of diet and/or physical activity) are widely incorporated in treatment programs for cardio-vascular diseases including diabetes mellitus and obesity. An web-based education tool on upper abdominal pain and other complaints combined with a lifestyle interventions for patients may be an effective treatment option for this large group of patients. This study investigates the potential of an individualized web-based education tool as intervention for patients with functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome and uncomplicated symptomatic cholecystolithiasis with the possibility to visit the Prevention and Lifestyle clinic (RELIEF pathway). The RELIEF pathway aims to reduce unnecessary health care utilization and, secondly, to maintain and improve quality of life by educating patients on lifestyle improvement.
According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, patients receiving high-risk or moderate-risk febrile neutropenia (FN) chemotherapy with at least one risk factor should receive prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs). However, pegfilgrastim-induced bone pain (PIBP) remains a common and significant clinical issue without a satisfactory solution. Studies have reported that the incidence rate of PIBP is 71.3%, with severe bone pain occurring in 27.0% of cases. Currently, the available data on PIBP treatment are limited to case reports, reviews, and small randomized controlled trials. The NCCN guidelines recommend preventive oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or antihistamines as the treatment for PIBP. However, even with these preventive measures, the incidence rate of PIBP remains high at 61.1%, with severe bone pain occurring in 19.2% of cases. Severe bone pain can significantly impact the patient's health-related quality of life (HRQol), leading to potential refusal of pegfilgrastim administration and subsequent dose reduction in effective chemotherapy. Ultimately, this may have negative implications for tumor cure rates and patient survival. Based on previous literature, it appears that delaying the administration of pegfilgrastim may be associated with a lower incidence of PIBP. Therefore, our study aims to investigate the correlation between the timing of pegfilgrastim administration and the occurrence of PIBP.
The transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) population with severe aortic stenosis (AS) is characterized by advanced age (most patients are octogenarians) and multiple comorbidities. For elderly patients, improvements in heart failure symptoms, functional status, and quality of life (QOL) maybe as important as longevity or even more. Over the last decade, we observe a change in trend, estimating medical interventions by clinical parameters along with other non-clinical parameters indicating a day-to-day improvement in factors which are more valuable to the patient and their families. This change is based on the understanding that treating a patient's physical symptoms successfully does not necessarily mean improving their QOL. The patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) initiative is focused upon what matters to patients during and following medical interventions. Data on PROMs in TAVI patients is increasing over the years but is still lacking, despite its potential to improve patient's care. In this study, we intend to create a novel self-developed patient-oriented PROM questionnaire specifically for TAVI patients and use it to assess the differences between physician's and patient's perception of a successful TAVI procedure. These discrepancies will form the basis for building a forecast model for a successful TAVI from the patient's perspective.
Preoperative Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have revolutionized the treatment landscape of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, there are still a significant proportion of patients who could not benefit from such treatment modality. Currently, no effective biomarkers were identified to stratify responders and non-responders. Early dynamic and persistent relief of dysphagia may act as a predictive biomarker to reflect the on-treatment anti-tumor activity. In this prospective study, we aimed to explore the feasibility of using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to predict the pathological complete response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy with or without short-term radiation as well as to assess the efficacy and safety of short-term radiotherapy in PROs-insensitive patients after one cycle of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.
Status epilepticus (SE) is a common life-threatening neurological emergency in which prolonged or multiple closely spaced seizures can result in long-term impairments. SE remains associated with considerable mortality and morbidity, with little progress over the last three decades. The proportion of patients who die in the hospital is about 20% overall and 40% in patients with refractory SE. Morbidity is more difficult to evaluate, as adverse effects of SE are often difficult to differentiate from those attributed to the cause of SE. Our experience suggests that nearly 50% of patients may experience long-term functional impairments. The precise description of the consequences of these functional impairments and their impact on quality of life after SE requiring intensive care management has been little studied. Indeed, if cognitive, physical and mental impairments are now identified in the populations of patients who required intensive care under the term post-resuscitation syndrome (PICS), neuronal lesions consecutive to the SE itself or to its cause could be responsible for these different functional alterations. Thus, the following have been described: (i) cognitive disorders in the areas of attention, executive functions and verbal fluency, visual and working memory disorders, but also spatio-temporal disorders; (ii) physical disorders such as the so-called post-resuscitation polyneuromyopathy; and (iii) mental disorders such as anxiety disorders, depressive states or those related to post-traumatic stress. Assessment and characterization of patient-reported outcomes is essential to complement the holistic assessment of clinically relevant outcomes from the patient's perspective. Here, we propose the development of a cross-sectional collection of PROs of the different constituents of PICs and HR-QOLs, and associated with functional patient outcomes, in those who required ICU management for status epilepticus.
Type 1 diabetes requires people with type 1 diabetes to constantly monitor their blood glucose and adjust their insulin doses to try and keep glucose levels in range. Hybrid closed loop systems (also called artificial pancreas) consist of a sensor that continuously measures glucose levels, an algorithm that then decides every few minutes how much insulin to deliver and an insulin pump that then delivers the insulin. These systems have been shown in observational and randomized studies to improve glucose levels and have high levels of user satisfaction. The National Health Service (NHS) in the UK has launched a pilot for up to 1,000 people with type 1 diabetes to trial these devices for up to 1 year and the results of that pilot will be audited by clinical teams. This study will recruit people from that pilot and use well validated as well as bespoke questionnaires to assess the impact of this technology on various key patient reported outcomes such as depression, diabetes related distress and fear of hypoglycemia (low blood glucose). We will invite a small number of participants to take part in semi-structured interviews to gain a more detailed understanding of the benefits and challenges of using these devices, and the impact they have on people living with type 1 diabetes. We know that living with a partner with type 1 diabetes can also have a negative impact on quality of life, and so we will invite partners of people using the hybrid closed loops systems to complete some validated and bespoke questionnaires. A small sample will also be invited to participate in interviews. The data from this real-world study of the impact of hybrid closed loop systems on patient reported outcomes will be of value to clinicians, people with type 1 diabetes and policy makers in understanding the value of these systems to people with type 1 diabetes and their families.
Evaluate the safety and efficacy of palonosetron versus ondansetron to reduce and control post-operative nausea in bariatric surgery.
Prospective multicenter observational no-profit study evaluating the impact of ERAS program items adherence rates on patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and return to intendend oncologic therapy (RIOT) after colorectal resection. Prospective enrollment from November 2020 to October 2021 in 60 Italian surgical centers. All patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery with anastomosis will be included in a prospective database after written informed consent. A total of 3,000 patients is expected based on a mean of 50 cases per center.