View clinical trials related to Patient Reported Outcomes.
Filter by:According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, patients receiving high-risk or moderate-risk febrile neutropenia (FN) chemotherapy with at least one risk factor should receive prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs). However, pegfilgrastim-induced bone pain (PIBP) remains a common and significant clinical issue without a satisfactory solution. Studies have reported that the incidence rate of PIBP is 71.3%, with severe bone pain occurring in 27.0% of cases. Currently, the available data on PIBP treatment are limited to case reports, reviews, and small randomized controlled trials. The NCCN guidelines recommend preventive oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or antihistamines as the treatment for PIBP. However, even with these preventive measures, the incidence rate of PIBP remains high at 61.1%, with severe bone pain occurring in 19.2% of cases. Severe bone pain can significantly impact the patient's health-related quality of life (HRQol), leading to potential refusal of pegfilgrastim administration and subsequent dose reduction in effective chemotherapy. Ultimately, this may have negative implications for tumor cure rates and patient survival. Based on previous literature, it appears that delaying the administration of pegfilgrastim may be associated with a lower incidence of PIBP. Therefore, our study aims to investigate the correlation between the timing of pegfilgrastim administration and the occurrence of PIBP.
The transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) population with severe aortic stenosis (AS) is characterized by advanced age (most patients are octogenarians) and multiple comorbidities. For elderly patients, improvements in heart failure symptoms, functional status, and quality of life (QOL) maybe as important as longevity or even more. Over the last decade, we observe a change in trend, estimating medical interventions by clinical parameters along with other non-clinical parameters indicating a day-to-day improvement in factors which are more valuable to the patient and their families. This change is based on the understanding that treating a patient's physical symptoms successfully does not necessarily mean improving their QOL. The patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) initiative is focused upon what matters to patients during and following medical interventions. Data on PROMs in TAVI patients is increasing over the years but is still lacking, despite its potential to improve patient's care. In this study, we intend to create a novel self-developed patient-oriented PROM questionnaire specifically for TAVI patients and use it to assess the differences between physician's and patient's perception of a successful TAVI procedure. These discrepancies will form the basis for building a forecast model for a successful TAVI from the patient's perspective.
Preoperative Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have revolutionized the treatment landscape of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, there are still a significant proportion of patients who could not benefit from such treatment modality. Currently, no effective biomarkers were identified to stratify responders and non-responders. Early dynamic and persistent relief of dysphagia may act as a predictive biomarker to reflect the on-treatment anti-tumor activity. In this prospective study, we aimed to explore the feasibility of using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to predict the pathological complete response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy with or without short-term radiation as well as to assess the efficacy and safety of short-term radiotherapy in PROs-insensitive patients after one cycle of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.
Status epilepticus (SE) is a common life-threatening neurological emergency in which prolonged or multiple closely spaced seizures can result in long-term impairments. SE remains associated with considerable mortality and morbidity, with little progress over the last three decades. The proportion of patients who die in the hospital is about 20% overall and 40% in patients with refractory SE. Morbidity is more difficult to evaluate, as adverse effects of SE are often difficult to differentiate from those attributed to the cause of SE. Our experience suggests that nearly 50% of patients may experience long-term functional impairments. The precise description of the consequences of these functional impairments and their impact on quality of life after SE requiring intensive care management has been little studied. Indeed, if cognitive, physical and mental impairments are now identified in the populations of patients who required intensive care under the term post-resuscitation syndrome (PICS), neuronal lesions consecutive to the SE itself or to its cause could be responsible for these different functional alterations. Thus, the following have been described: (i) cognitive disorders in the areas of attention, executive functions and verbal fluency, visual and working memory disorders, but also spatio-temporal disorders; (ii) physical disorders such as the so-called post-resuscitation polyneuromyopathy; and (iii) mental disorders such as anxiety disorders, depressive states or those related to post-traumatic stress. Assessment and characterization of patient-reported outcomes is essential to complement the holistic assessment of clinically relevant outcomes from the patient's perspective. Here, we propose the development of a cross-sectional collection of PROs of the different constituents of PICs and HR-QOLs, and associated with functional patient outcomes, in those who required ICU management for status epilepticus.
Type 1 diabetes requires people with type 1 diabetes to constantly monitor their blood glucose and adjust their insulin doses to try and keep glucose levels in range. Hybrid closed loop systems (also called artificial pancreas) consist of a sensor that continuously measures glucose levels, an algorithm that then decides every few minutes how much insulin to deliver and an insulin pump that then delivers the insulin. These systems have been shown in observational and randomized studies to improve glucose levels and have high levels of user satisfaction. The National Health Service (NHS) in the UK has launched a pilot for up to 1,000 people with type 1 diabetes to trial these devices for up to 1 year and the results of that pilot will be audited by clinical teams. This study will recruit people from that pilot and use well validated as well as bespoke questionnaires to assess the impact of this technology on various key patient reported outcomes such as depression, diabetes related distress and fear of hypoglycemia (low blood glucose). We will invite a small number of participants to take part in semi-structured interviews to gain a more detailed understanding of the benefits and challenges of using these devices, and the impact they have on people living with type 1 diabetes. We know that living with a partner with type 1 diabetes can also have a negative impact on quality of life, and so we will invite partners of people using the hybrid closed loops systems to complete some validated and bespoke questionnaires. A small sample will also be invited to participate in interviews. The data from this real-world study of the impact of hybrid closed loop systems on patient reported outcomes will be of value to clinicians, people with type 1 diabetes and policy makers in understanding the value of these systems to people with type 1 diabetes and their families.