Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Air Insufflation, Water Immersion and Water Exchange During on Demand Sedation Colonoscopy in CRC Screening Patients
Verified date | January 2014 |
Source | Presidio Ospedaliero Santa Barbara |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Italy: Ethics Committee |
Study type | Interventional |
Water-aided method for colonoscopy can be broadly subdivided into two major categories. Water Immersion (WI), characterized by suction removal of the infused water predominantly during the withdrawal phase of colonoscopy, and Water Exchange (WE), characterized by suction removal of infused water predominantly during the insertion phase of colonoscopy. Several studies showed that WE significantly reduces pain compared to WI and colonoscopy with traditional air insufflation (AI), increases the number of unsedated procedures and adenoma detection rate (ADR), in particular proximal ADR. This randomized controlled trial will be a direct comparison of Air Insufflation, Water Immersion and Water Exchange to test the hypothesis that WAC (particularly WE) would significantly decrease pain score during colonoscopy in average-risk screening patients. Several other secondary outcomes will also be analyzed.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 288 |
Est. completion date | November 2013 |
Est. primary completion date | November 2013 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 50 Years to 70 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Consecutive 50 to 70 year-old first time average-risk screening patients agreeing to start procedure without premedication. Exclusion Criteria: - patient unwillingness to start the procedure without sedation/analgesia - previous colorectal surgery - patient refusal or inability to provide informed consent - inadequate bowel preparation (patients unable to swallow at least ¾ of cleansing preparation, or that did have late and insufficient evacuations, or that reported the presence of residual stools in the last evacuations). |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Italy | S. Barbara Hospital | Iglesias | Cagliari |
Italy | N. S. di Bonaria Hospital | San Gavino Monreale | VS |
United States | Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System | Los Angeles | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Presidio Ospedaliero Santa Barbara |
United States, Italy,
Brocchi E, Pezzilli R, Tomassetti P, Campana D, Morselli-Labate AM, Corinaldesi R. Warm water or oil-assisted colonoscopy: toward simpler examinations? Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Mar;103(3):581-7. Epub 2007 Dec 12. — View Citation
Leung CW, Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R, Wu KK, Leung FW, Friedland S. Water immersion versus standard colonoscopy insertion technique: randomized trial shows promise for minimal sedation. Endoscopy. 2010 Jul;42(7):557-63. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244231. Epub 2010 Jun 30. — View Citation
Leung F, Harker J, Leung J, Siao-Salera R, Mann S, Ramirez F, Friedland S, Amato A, Radaelli F, Paggi S, Terruzzi V, Hsieh Y. Removal of infused water predominantly during insertion (water exchange) is consistently associated with a greater reduction of pain score - review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of water method colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;1(3):114-120. Epub 2011 Jul 1. — View Citation
Leung FW, Amato A, Ell C, Friedland S, Harker JO, Hsieh YH, Leung JW, Mann SK, Paggi S, Pohl J, Radaelli F, Ramirez FC, Siao-Salera R, Terruzzi V. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Sep;76(3):657-66. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.04.467. Review. — View Citation
Leung FW. Water exchange may be superior to water immersion for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Dec;9(12):1012-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Sep 22. — View Citation
Pohl J, Messer I, Behrens A, Kaiser G, Mayer G, Ell C. Water infusion for cecal intubation increases patient tolerance, but does not improve intubation of unsedated colonoscopies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Dec;9(12):1039-43.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.06.031. Epub 2011 Jul 13. — View Citation
Rabenstein T, Radaelli F, Zolk O. Warm water infusion colonoscopy: a review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2012 Oct;44(10):940-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1310157. Epub 2012 Sep 17. Review. — View Citation
Radaelli F, Paggi S, Amato A, Terruzzi V. Warm water infusion versus air insufflation for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):701-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.06.025. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Position changes. | Change in patient position as needed if advancement of the colonoscope fails. | 1 hour | No |
Other | Loop reduction maneuvers. | Applied as needed if advancement of the colonoscope fails. | 1 hour | No |
Other | Amount of water used during the procedure. | Amount of infused water during insertion and withdrawal. | 1 hour | No |
Other | Bloating at completion of examination. | Bloating felt by patients at completion of examination on a 10 point visual analogue scale. | 1 hour | No |
Other | Bloating at discharge. | Bloating felt by patients at discharge measured on a ten point visual analogue scale. | 1 hour | No |
Other | Patients willingness to repeat the examination. | Patients willingness to repeat the examination based on overall satisfaction about procedure. Measured at discharge on a yes/no question. | 1 hour | No |
Other | Oxygen desaturation. | Significant oxygen desaturation will be recorded when values less than 85% will be maintained for more than 15 seconds. | 1 hour | Yes |
Other | Vagal reaction. | Vagal reaction is defined as heart rate <60 beats per minute accompanied by excessive sweating, nausea and/or vomiting. | 1 hour | Yes |
Primary | Maximum pain score recorded during colonoscopy. | Pain will be assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) with a score 0=absence of pain, 2=simply "discomfort", 10=the worst possible pain. Before the procedure, an endoscopic nurse will explain the VAS scoring system to the patients. The patient will be informed that the request for pain information is not to remind the patient that the examination should be uncomfortable, but to let the colonoscopist be alerted to the need to use maneuvers to minimize discomfort (e.g. loop reduction, removal of colonic content, abdominal compression and/or change in patient position). At regular intervals during colonoscopy (e.g. every 2-3 minutes) patients will be asked about discomfort or pain. The responses will be recorded, and the maximum pain score noted. | 1 hour | No |
Secondary | Need for sedation/analgesia and its dosage. | Sedation and analgesia will be available on demand. Medication will be offered when VAS score reaches =2 (discomfort). Patients can accept or decline the medication. If patients agree to accept the medication, it will be given. Midazolam, no more than 5 mg per patient, will be used. When pain is reported, sedation will be started with midazolam with a single intravenous dose of 2 mg, plus incremental doses of 1 mg if the patient still continues to complain about pain. To avoid bias by the colonoscopist, sedation medication will be administered based on the patients' confirmation that the pain is no longer tolerable, and not at the discretion of the colonoscopist. No other analgesic or sedative medications will be administered. The colon segment in which patients requests sedation will be recorded. | 1 hour | Yes |
Secondary | Overall pain after the procedure. | After the procedure and at discharge from the Endoscopy Unit, an assistant nurse blinded to the procedure will ask patients about overall pain using the same VAS when neither the endoscopist nor the assistant nurse who performed the colonoscopy were present. Patients will be asked to quantify the degree of pain experienced and to place a mark over the VAS accordingly. | 1 hour | No |
Secondary | Cecal intubation rate. | Cecal intubation will be defined as passage of the tip of the colonoscope beyond the ileocecal valve so that the medial wall of the cecum proximal to the ileocecal valve will be observed. This will be analyzed on an intention- to-treat basis according to group allocation. | 1 hour | No |
Secondary | Cecal intubation time. | Cecal intubation time will be defined as the time for passage of the colonoscope from the rectum to the cecum. | 1 hour | No |
Secondary | Total procedure time. | Total procedure time (including time required for polyp resection or biopsy). | 1 hour. | No |
Secondary | Adenoma detection rate. | Proportion of subjects with at least one adenoma of any size. | 10 months. | No |
Secondary | Adenoma resection rate. | Total number of adenomas resected per subject. | 10 months. | No |
Secondary | Advanced adenoma. | Total number of advanced adenomas: diameter =10mm, or high grade dysplasia, or with =20% villous components. | 10 months. | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05559255 -
Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04748367 -
Leveraging on Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Pain and Anxiety in Children During Immunization in Primary Care
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04356352 -
Lidocaine, Esmolol, or Placebo to Relieve IV Propofol Pain
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05057988 -
Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04466111 -
Observational, Post Market Study in Treating Chronic Upper Extremity Limb Pain
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06206252 -
Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
|
||
Completed |
NCT05868122 -
A Study to Evaluate a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05006976 -
A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06087432 -
Is PNF Application Effective on Temporomandibular Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05508594 -
Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03646955 -
Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03472300 -
Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
|
||
Completed |
NCT03678168 -
A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03286543 -
Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03931772 -
Online Automated Self-Hypnosis Program
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02913027 -
Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams?
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02181387 -
Acetaminophen Use in Labor - Does Use of Acetaminophen Reduce Neuraxial Analgesic Drug Requirement During Labor?
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06032559 -
Implementation and Effectiveness of Mindfulness Oriented Recovery Enhancement as an Adjunct to Methadone Treatment
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03613155 -
Assessment of Anxiety in Patients Treated by SMUR Toulouse and Receiving MEOPA as Part of Their Care
|